THE RUDOLF REPORT

GERMAR RUDOLF · THE RUDOLF REPORTB: On building technologyThe investigation of the events of alleged mass gassings in the indicatedrooms claimed by witnesses, from a technical and practicalstandpoint, including physical-chemical analysis, showed:1. The extensive documentation on the Auschwitz camp does notcontain a single reference to execution ‘gas chambers’; rather it refutessuch suspicions.2. The supposed main gas chambers of Auschwitz, the morgue hallof the crematorium in the main camp and the morgue cellars I(‘gas chambers’) of crematories II and III, did not have any meansfor the introduction of poison gas mixtures. Holes in the roofsvisible today were made after the war, and all other cracks are theresult of the building’s destruction at the end of the war.3. The release of lethal quantities of hydrogen cyanide from the ZyklonB carrier requires many multiples of the time asserted; the actualduration runs to several hours.4. To provide the necessary ventilation for the supposed ‘gas chambers’of crematories II and III would have taken many hours, contraryto all witness testimony.5. It would have been impossible to provide an effective ventilationof the supposed ‘gas chambers’ of crematories IV or V or of farmhousesI and II. The corpses could not have been removed fromthe rooms and carried away by the Sonderkommando without protectivegarments and the use of gas masks with special filters.Conclusion to B:The procedures of mass-gassing as attested to by witnessesduring their interrogation before various courts of law, as cited injudicial rulings, and as described in scientific and literary publications,in any building of Auschwitz whatever, are inconsistent withdocumentary evidence, technical necessities, and natural scientificlaw.Germar Rudolf, Certified Chemist, in exile, on September 13,2002.290