THE RUDOLF REPORT

GERMAR RUDOLF · THE RUDOLF REPORTIn Nuremberg, the propaganda lies of the victors were givenreference numbers. Since then they have become ‘facts.’All courts have continually prevented all gas chamber skepticsfrom use of any evidence for their scientific investigations. The courtshave taken the point of view that the homicidal gas chambers should beregarded as commonly known ‘facts’. ‘Commonly known’ means thatthe existence of homicidal gas chambers is as certain a fact as that theday has 24 hours. The Nuremberg Military Tribunal introduced the useof ‘common knowledge’ into judicial practice. Pure war horror propagandaitems from the Second World War were turned into ‘facts’(IMT-Statutes 19 and 21) which had to be accepted without questionby the accused. Defense attorneys who attempted to prove the oppositewere threatened with the death penalty. The Stalinist massacre at Katynwas one of the charges, as well as homicidal gassings in the formerconcentration camp Dachau (IMT Document 2430-PS). In Document3311-PS, the Polish government “put the victors’ tribunal on notice”that hundreds of thousands of Jews had been “steamed” at Treblinka.Note: “steamed”, not ‘gassed’. Today, the Holocausters look downshamefully when they are confronted with this nonsense. In the greatNational Socialist trial before the District and Chamber Court of Berlin(ref. PKs 3-50) it was determined: “There were no gas chamber structuresin the concentration camp Majdanek”. But in Schweinfurt, GeneralRemer was sentenced to imprisonment because he had publishedin his Depeschen the court’s determination on the absence of gaschambers in Majdanek.To destroy the German people, only these words are necessary:‘common knowledge.’Concerning the alleged gas chambers, no one can speak of thekind of common knowledge such as that which underlies the fact thatthe day has 24 hours. Only such assertions, as that the day has 24hours, require no proof. In all other cases there must be proof.Remer’s proofs are new and far superiorThe defense attorneys, Hajo Herrmann and Dr. Herbert Schaller,had prepared comprehensive evidence. They prepared their evidence toconform with a decision of the Upper District Court of Düsseldorf. In a‘gas chamber denial’ case, this court held that evidence must be admittedwhen it was superior to the ‘proofs’ in the former National Socialist358