THE RUDOLF REPORT

5. AUSCHWITZAlso, one could have drastically increased the evaporation rate ofthe Zyklon B in this basket even further, hence accelerating theexecution procedure. All that would have been required was to alteran idea the Topf engineers had in early March 1943. When facingcooling problems of the cremation furnaces’ forced draughtblowers, the Topf engineers suggested to use the excess heat producedby these engines to pre-heat the morgue. The only constructionalchange needed for this was to redirect this excess heat intothe morgue’s air intake duct. 275 Though the forced draught blowersoverheated and were damaged shortly thereafter, 228 it would havebeen easy to construct a short air duct from the furnace chimney tothe air intake duct of morgue 1 instead. In this way, warm air comingfrom the crematory ovens would have been redirected over theZyklon B basket into morgue 1, supplying this room with warmair enriched with HCN.I assume the point I am making is clear: there were all sorts ofcheaper and less complicated solutions available than suggested byMichal Kula. His solution is simply impracticable and is an insult toevery engineer’s and architect’s intelligence—naturally bearing inmind the fact that the ruins of crematorium II clearly prove that nosuch columns were ever installed anyway.5.4.1.2.9. ConclusionsPressac’s “criminal traces” have been refuted on structural engineeringgrounds. So, too, have all the ‘eyewitnesses’, who have beendiscredited without exception. The alleged homicidal ‘gas chambers’are therefore refuted upon the grounds of building engineering. Or, inRobert Faurisson’s words:“No Holes, No ‘Holocaust’”In summary, the arguments relating to the introduction columnsmay be listed as follows:technique. Also, such a loss of HCN is minimal compared to the loss following Kula’s scenario.For more on this, see chapter 7.3.1.3.275 See chapter 5.4.1.2.5.133