13.07.2015 Views

THE RUDOLF REPORT

THE RUDOLF REPORT

THE RUDOLF REPORT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR <strong>RUDOLF</strong> · <strong>THE</strong> <strong>RUDOLF</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong>Kahlenbergerdorf(Austria), the 2.6.1988,Source: Honsik, Acquittalfor Hitler?As a Roman Catholicpriest I say to you ... questionthe existence of gaschambers in the ThirdReich. It is the right ofthose who seek the truthto be allowed to doubt,investigate and evaluate.Wherever this doubtingand evaluating is forbidden,wherever someonedemands that he must bebelieved, an arrogancearises that is a blasphemyto God. This is why. Ifthose whom you doubthave the truth on theirside, they will accept anyquestions gracefully andanswer them patiently.They will no longer hidetheir proofs and their records.If these are lying,they will cry for the judge.That is how you will recognizethem. The truth isalways graceful, while liescry out for earthly judges.Respectfully,with best regards,/s/ Pastor Viktor RobertKnirschSchweinfurt (EH) - On October 22, 1992, the FirstGreat Criminal Chamber of the District Court ofSchweinfurt, Judge Siebenbürger presiding, sentencedGeneral Remer for publication of a scientificexpert report. The main point of the expert reportRemer had published was: there were no mass killingsin Auschwitz with Zyklon B. The court called thispublication ‘incitement to racial hatred,’ and Siebenbürgerimposed on General Remer a sentence of 22months imprisonment without probation. State AttorneyBaumann demanded a 30 months prison termand moved for the immediate arrest of the 80-yearold defendant in the courtroom. Observers of the trialbegan to suspect that the sentence had been decidedbefore the trial began. At 9:00 hours on October20, 1992, the day the trial opened, radioBAYERN 1 had announced: “This time it will costRemer. […] this time the punishment will be harder.”How did the announcer from B1 know that GeneralRemer would be punished more severely than inprevious trials? Why was an acquittal not conceivable?This document is one of many that were presentedto the court as evidence.Answer: “Denied on grounds of commonknowledge.”FOREIGN OFFICE214-E-StuparekBonn , 8th Jan. 1979Dear Mr. Stuparek!Federal Minister Genscher has asked me to respond toyour letter of December 21, 1978.As far as I know, there were no gas chambers in thecamp of Auschwitz ...Best regards,For the Federal Minister,/s/ Dr. Scheel356

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!