13.07.2015 Views

a database of the National Library of M

a database of the National Library of M

a database of the National Library of M

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1100 ppm vinyl chloride for 5 days or 4 wk. The number <strong>of</strong> adductsincreased in a supralinear manner. Exposure to 10 ppm vinyl chloride for 5days caused a 2- to 3-fold incr in epsilon G over that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> controls,while 4 wk exposure resulted in a 5-fold incr. This was confirmed with[13C2]vinyl chloride &amp; by measuring exogenous &amp; endogenous adductsin <strong>the</strong> same animals. Exposure to 100 ppm vinyl chloride for 4 wk caused a25-fold incr in epsilon G levels over that found in control rats, whileexposure to 1100 ppm resulted in a 42-fold incr. The amount <strong>of</strong> endogenousepsilon G was similar in liver DNA from rats &amp; humans. A comparableresponse to exposure was seen in rats &amp; mice exposed to 0, 25, 250 or2500 ppm vinyl fluoride for 12 months. There was a very high correlationbetween epsilon G levels in rat &amp; mouse liver at 12 months &amp; <strong>the</strong>incidence <strong>of</strong> haemangiosarcoma at 2 yr. /The authors/ were able todemonstrate that <strong>the</strong> target cell population for angiosarcoma, <strong>the</strong>nonparenchymal cells, contained more epsilon G than hepatocytes, eventhough nonparenchymal cells are exposed by diffusion <strong>of</strong> vinyl halidemetabolites formed in hepatocytes. The expression <strong>of</strong> N-methylpurine-DNAglycosylase mRNA was induced in rat liver after exposure to ei<strong>the</strong>r 25 or2500 ppm vinyl fluoride. When this induction was investigated inhepatocytes &amp; nonparenchymal cells, it was found that <strong>the</strong> latter hadonly 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> N-methylpurine-DNA glycosylase mRNA <strong>of</strong> hepatocytes, &amp;that only <strong>the</strong> hepatocytes had induction <strong>of</strong> this expression after exposureto vinyl fluoride. Thus, <strong>the</strong> target cells for vinyl halide carcinogenesishave much lower expression <strong>of</strong> this DNA repair enzyme, which has beenassociated with e<strong>the</strong>no adduct repair.[Swenberg JA et al; IARC Sci Publ150: 29-43 (1999)]**PEER REVIEWED**Dose-response relationships <strong>of</strong> genotoxic agents differ greatly dependingon <strong>the</strong> agent &amp; <strong>the</strong> endpoint being evaluated. Simple conclusions thatgenotoxic effects are linear cannot be applied universally. The shape <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> molecular dose <strong>of</strong> DNA adducts varies from linear, to supralinear, tosublinear depending on metabolic activation &amp; detoxication, &amp;repair <strong>of</strong> individual types <strong>of</strong> DNA adducts. For mutagenesis and o<strong>the</strong>rgenotoxicity endpoints, <strong>the</strong> dose-response reflects <strong>the</strong> molecular dose <strong>of</strong>each type <strong>of</strong> DNA adduct, cell proliferation, as well as endogenous factorsthat lead to mutagenesis such as <strong>the</strong> formation &amp; repair <strong>of</strong> endogenousDNA adducts. These same factors are important when interpreting <strong>the</strong> shape<strong>of</strong> dose-response data for carcinogenesis <strong>of</strong> genotoxic agents, however,tumor background variability adds additional complexity. Endogenouslyformed DNA adducts may be identical to those formed by chemicals, as in<strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> vinyl chloride &amp; ethylene oxide, or <strong>the</strong>y may be thoseassociated with oxidative stress. Data presented in this paper demonstratethat <strong>the</strong> exogenous number <strong>of</strong> adducts induced by 5 days <strong>of</strong> exposure to 10ppm vinyl chloride is only 2.2-fold > that present as a steady-stateamount in unexposed control rats. Similar data are shown for ethyleneoxide. Extremely sensitive methods have been developed for measuring <strong>the</strong>molecular dose <strong>of</strong> genotoxins. These methods can detect DNA adducts as lowas 1 per 10(9) to 10(10). However, in view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high number <strong>of</strong>endogenous DNA adducts that are present in all cells, it is unlikely thatcausal relationships can be attributed to very low numbers <strong>of</strong> such DNAadducts. Effects <strong>of</strong> both exogenous &amp; endogenous DNA adducts need to befactored into <strong>the</strong> interpretation <strong>of</strong> chemical exposures. [SWENBERG JA etal; MUTATION RESEARCH 464 (1): 77-86 (2000)]**PEER REVIEWED**E<strong>the</strong>no adducts in DNA bases are formed from exogenous agents such as vinylchloride &amp; urethane, but also via endogenous lipid peroxidationproducts like trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. An immunohistochemical method was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!