Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Nina ObuljenNina Obuljen is a research fellow at the Institute for International Relations in Zagreb, Croatia.Currently, she is Assistant Minister for International Relations and EU Affairs at the CroatianMinistry of Culture. She graduated both from the Academy of Music and the Faculty of Arts at theUniversity of Zagreb. She holds a Masters of Political Science from the University of Zagreb and isenrolled in doctoral studies at the same University. She is a member of the Editorial Board of theCulturelink Review and a former member of the Steering Committee of the International Networkfor Cultural Diversity (INCD).From 2004 until 2006 Ms Obuljen was the chairperson of the Cultural Council for InternationalRelations and European Integration of the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Croatia. MsObuljen was head of the Croatian delegation for the negotiations about the Draft Conventionon the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions in UNESCO. She isa member of the Croatian negotiating team for the accession to the EU for the chapters onEducation and Culture; and Information Society and Media.In July 2004 Nina Obuljen was awarded the European Cultural Policy Research Award forher research on the impact of EU enlargement on cultural policies. Nina Obuljen is the authorof several articles in the field of cultural policy focusing in particular on the issues of the EUintegration, transformations of cultural policies and cultural diversity.116Biography Nina Obuljen
Author: Nina ObuljenEditor: Janet Hadley (janet-hadley@blueyonder.co.uk)Design: De C, Ris van Overeem & René Kuipers, AmsterdamPrinted by: Spinhex & Industrie, AmsterdamNina Obuljen is hereby identified as the author of this work inaccordance with Dutch Copyright and asserts her moral rights.isbn-10 90 6282 046 8isbn-13 978 90 6282 046 8published by the European Cultural FoundationJan van Goyenkade 51075 HN Amsterdamt +31 20 573 38 68f +31 20 675 22 31www.eurocult.org117
Page 1 and 2:
Why we need European cultural polic
Page 3:
06081116171822252829313737404343454
Page 6 and 7:
Prologue When I decided to research
Page 8 and 9:
If I had the opportunity of startin
Page 10 and 11:
Measures directly referring to cult
Page 12 and 13:
obstacles encountered during the pe
Page 14 and 15:
Part 1Theconceptualframe ofthe stud
Page 16 and 17:
argument referred to identifying ex
Page 18 and 19:
Gray called for comparative researc
Page 20 and 21:
The Council of Europe and comparati
Page 22 and 23:
a broader understanding of culture,
Page 24 and 25:
The first one is a `macro’ dimens
Page 26 and 27:
Part 2European Union,culture andcul
Page 28 and 29:
narrow sense - still remains exclud
Page 30 and 31:
Niedobitek (see page 29) drew atten
Page 32 and 33:
Even though the author thought that
Page 34 and 35:
In spring 2005 two founding members
Page 36 and 37:
I am focussing more on the technica
Page 38 and 39:
while enlargement negotiations were
Page 40 and 41:
ights.56 Since the mid-1990s, the E
Page 42 and 43:
This included information about Cha
Page 44 and 45:
Gradual development and introductio
Page 46 and 47:
of the background presented earlier
Page 48 and 49:
Èventually, a solution was found,
Page 50 and 51:
In regard to other taxes, opinions
Page 52 and 53:
meet the recently introduced regula
Page 54 and 55:
introduces the possibility of makin
Page 56 and 57:
One of the recommendations in the F
Page 58 and 59:
IPR legislation into line with Worl
Page 60 and 61:
Preliminary assessmentof the impact
Page 62 and 63:
Changes in taxation policies were n
Page 64 and 65: policy areas and the ensuing transf
Page 66 and 67: Part 3What willthe futurebring?68 P
Page 68 and 69: Manuel Barroso, President of the Eu
Page 70 and 71: has been embraced by the European m
Page 73 and 74: Instead of a conclusionThe aim of t
Page 75 and 76: 1 The French term acquis communauta
Page 77 and 78: 14 When deciding on the methodology
Page 79 and 80: 30 OJ C 336, 19/12/1992.31 1st Repo
Page 81 and 82: 45 After the signing and entry into
Page 83 and 84: 65 See Annex 1 for a copy of theque
Page 85 and 86: 81 32001G0731(01) Council Resolutio
Page 87 and 88: culture, which needs to be exempt f
Page 89 and 90: Aubry P, (2000)The `Television with
Page 91 and 92: Draus F, (2001)Èst-Ouest, le dit e
Page 93 and 94: Futo P, Cuculić J, et al (2002)Met
Page 95 and 96: Laher L, (2001)Trapped in the notio
Page 97 and 98: Puchala D J, (1971)Òf blind men, e
Page 99 and 100: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W, (1997)Euro
Page 101 and 102: 2. In your opinion, have the cultur
Page 103 and 104: 13. Have there been any changes in
Page 105 and 106: Annex 3List of CPRA jury membersMil
Page 107 and 108: Political Economy Cultural Economic
Page 109 and 110: Annex 4GlossaryAcquis communautaire
Page 111 and 112: Cultural marketsA term used to desc
Page 113: Third countriesEU documents sometim
show all

Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?