Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
narrow sense – still remains excluded from harmonization. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, given recent developmentsand changes in structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> markets, it is very difficult to justify such a division and<strong>the</strong>refore, for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this study, it is necessary to treat both aspects as integral elements<strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy.Besides more technical and methodological questions about what should be consideredwithin <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union in <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sector, many authors have also lookedat perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> culture in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> integration. Thus, Kaufman andRaunig argued that one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union isthat it seems to be caught up in a condition <strong>of</strong> ambiguity, `… in a state informed by inconsistencybet<strong>we</strong>en grand ambitions on <strong>the</strong> one hand and a lack <strong>of</strong> political pouvoir on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, bet<strong>we</strong>enfinancial neglect, disinterest and its instrumentalisation as an ideological battlefield’ (Kaufman andRaunig, 2002). They suggested that international <strong>cultural</strong> activities in Europe and beyond havesignificantly increased, and <strong>the</strong>re is an obvious <strong>need</strong> to translate <strong>the</strong> functions that culture shouldand could take into concrete action in response to current political and social developmentswithin <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> as <strong>we</strong>ll as in a global context (Kaufman and Raunig ibid).This difficult situation is largely due to <strong>the</strong> fact that culture is bound to a relativelylimited legal framework at <strong>EU</strong> level and a more than modest budget is allocated toit ... Because it is <strong>of</strong> minor importance and yet ideologically highly charged at <strong>the</strong>same time, culture is considered a controversial issue – especially when it comesto discussing <strong>the</strong> division <strong>of</strong> competencies bet<strong>we</strong>en <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> and its member states.(Kaufman and Raunig ibid)Mucica raised a question about <strong>cultural</strong> policy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union in a similar way, highlighting<strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy is still considered very controversial:The idea <strong>of</strong> a `<strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy’ has been advanced in recent years,especially in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> growing policy-making role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union.But <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> a common <strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy is a highly controversialone, and a number <strong>of</strong> critics disagree with <strong>the</strong> notion, considering that what isindeed <strong>need</strong>ed is `<strong>European</strong> cooperation’, `<strong>policies</strong> for culture in Europe`, ra<strong>the</strong>rthan a `<strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy’.(Mucica 2003)In 2001, a report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Parliament <strong>of</strong>fered very interesting reflections on <strong>the</strong> currentsituation and <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>. In this report, Ruffolo, a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong>Parliament, argued that economic prosperity alone, or <strong>the</strong> single market and single currency, couldnot have mobilized member states and <strong>the</strong>ir citizens for <strong>European</strong> integration if <strong>the</strong>re had not beena clear political goal behind it (Ruffolo 2001). Such a political union, if it wants to become a realunion, has to enable member states to also share some common <strong>cultural</strong> values beside simpleeconomic interests. Ruffolo suggested that <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy would be <strong>of</strong>30Part 2 <strong>European</strong> Union, culture and <strong>cultural</strong> policy: <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> enlargement