<strong>European</strong> Commission (1998)Culture, <strong>cultural</strong> industries and employment.Brussels: <strong>European</strong> Commission SEC(98)837.<strong>European</strong> Commission, (1999)Europe’s Agenda 2000 [EN1 25/10] Brussels<strong>European</strong> Commission, (2002)‘Fourth report from <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Commission to <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Council, <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong>Parliament, <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Economic and Social Committee and <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Regionson <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Directive 89/552/EEC “Television without frontiers”,COM (2002) 778, final, Brussels.<strong>European</strong> Commission (2003)Commission Green Paper <strong>of</strong> 21 May 2003 on services <strong>of</strong> general interest.COM (2003) 270 final. Brussels.http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l23013.htm<strong>European</strong> Council, (1994)Texts concerning culture at <strong>European</strong> community level.KJE6257 A42. Also Supplement No. 1 (1993-1997) to <strong>the</strong> first edition.<strong>European</strong> Forum for <strong>the</strong> Arts and Heritage (EFAH and Interarts), (2003)Report on <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> cooperation in Europe, EFAH, Interarts, October.Everitt A, (1997)The governance <strong>of</strong> culture: approaches to integrated <strong>cultural</strong> planning and <strong>policies</strong>.Strasbourg: Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Publishing.<strong>European</strong> Parliament, (2000) Culture 2000 programme [Decision no 508/2000/EC]Field H, (1998)<strong>EU</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy and <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> a common <strong>European</strong> identity.Paper for <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union Studies Association New Zealand (<strong>EU</strong>SA-NZ) conference,The <strong>EU</strong> in <strong>the</strong> next millennium, Christchurch, New Zealand, September.http://www.eusanz.org/papers.htmlFisher R, Fox R, (2001)Culture and civil society: new relationships with <strong>the</strong> third sector.Cultural Policy Note No. 6, Cultural Policies Research and Development Unit.Strasbourg: Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Publishing.94References
Futo P, Cuculić J, et al (2002)Metodolos˘ki priruc˘nik za izradu analize uc˘inka uvod¯enja propisa Europske Unije.Zagreb: Ministarstvo za europske integracije.Germann C, (2003)Content industries and <strong>cultural</strong> diversity: The case <strong>of</strong> motion pictures, in:Culturelink, Special Issue on <strong>cultural</strong> diversity and sustainable development, 2002/2003Gordon C, Mundy S, (2001)<strong>European</strong> perspectives on <strong>cultural</strong> policy: <strong>cultural</strong> policy reviews and requirements for asustainable <strong>cultural</strong> policy. Culture, Development and Society Series, Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Grabe H, (2002)`<strong>European</strong> Union conditionality and <strong>the</strong> acquis communautaire.’International Political Science Review, vol 23, 3, 249–268.Grangier E, (2001)Concrete effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong>’s eastward expansion on <strong>cultural</strong> sector.<strong>European</strong> Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies.www.eiPCP.netGray C, (1996)`Comparing <strong>cultural</strong> policy: a reformulation.’ <strong>European</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Cultural Policy,vol 2(2), pp 213–222.Hancock D, (1983)`Comparative Public Policy: An assessment’ in Political science: The state <strong>of</strong> discipline,Finister A, ed, pp 283–308.Washington: American Political Science Association.Heidenheimer A J, Heclo H, Adams T C, (1990)Comparative public policy, The politics <strong>of</strong> social choice in America, Europe and Japan.New York: St Martin’s Press.Herold A, (2004)`<strong>EU</strong> film policy: Bet<strong>we</strong>en art and commerce.’ <strong>European</strong> Diversity and Autonomy PapersEDAP 3/2004 at www.eurac.edu/edapHugoson R, (1997)`The rhetoric <strong>of</strong> abstract goals in national <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>.’The <strong>European</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Cultural Policy, vol 3(2), 323–340.References95
- Page 1 and 2:
Why we need European cultural polic
- Page 3:
06081116171822252829313737404343454
- Page 6 and 7:
Prologue When I decided to research
- Page 8 and 9:
If I had the opportunity of startin
- Page 10 and 11:
Measures directly referring to cult
- Page 12 and 13:
obstacles encountered during the pe
- Page 14 and 15:
Part 1Theconceptualframe ofthe stud
- Page 16 and 17:
argument referred to identifying ex
- Page 18 and 19:
Gray called for comparative researc
- Page 20 and 21:
The Council of Europe and comparati
- Page 22 and 23:
a broader understanding of culture,
- Page 24 and 25:
The first one is a `macro’ dimens
- Page 26 and 27:
Part 2European Union,culture andcul
- Page 28 and 29:
narrow sense - still remains exclud
- Page 30 and 31:
Niedobitek (see page 29) drew atten
- Page 32 and 33:
Even though the author thought that
- Page 34 and 35:
In spring 2005 two founding members
- Page 36 and 37:
I am focussing more on the technica
- Page 38 and 39:
while enlargement negotiations were
- Page 40 and 41:
ights.56 Since the mid-1990s, the E
- Page 42 and 43: This included information about Cha
- Page 44 and 45: Gradual development and introductio
- Page 46 and 47: of the background presented earlier
- Page 48 and 49: `Eventually, a solution was found,
- Page 50 and 51: In regard to other taxes, opinions
- Page 52 and 53: meet the recently introduced regula
- Page 54 and 55: introduces the possibility of makin
- Page 56 and 57: One of the recommendations in the F
- Page 58 and 59: IPR legislation into line with Worl
- Page 60 and 61: Preliminary assessmentof the impact
- Page 62 and 63: Changes in taxation policies were n
- Page 64 and 65: policy areas and the ensuing transf
- Page 66 and 67: Part 3What willthe futurebring?68 P
- Page 68 and 69: Manuel Barroso, President of the Eu
- Page 70 and 71: has been embraced by the European m
- Page 73 and 74: Instead of a conclusionThe aim of t
- Page 75 and 76: 1 The French term acquis communauta
- Page 77 and 78: 14 When deciding on the methodology
- Page 79 and 80: 30 OJ C 336, 19/12/1992.31 1st Repo
- Page 81 and 82: 45 After the signing and entry into
- Page 83 and 84: 65 See Annex 1 for a copy of theque
- Page 85 and 86: 81 32001G0731(01) Council Resolutio
- Page 87 and 88: culture, which needs to be exempt f
- Page 89 and 90: Aubry P, (2000)The `Television with
- Page 91: Draus F, (2001)`Est-Ouest, le dit e
- Page 95 and 96: Laher L, (2001)Trapped in the notio
- Page 97 and 98: Puchala D J, (1971)`Of blind men, e
- Page 99 and 100: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W, (1997)Euro
- Page 101 and 102: 2. In your opinion, have the cultur
- Page 103 and 104: 13. Have there been any changes in
- Page 105 and 106: Annex 3List of CPRA jury membersMil
- Page 107 and 108: Political Economy Cultural Economic
- Page 109 and 110: Annex 4GlossaryAcquis communautaire
- Page 111 and 112: Cultural marketsA term used to desc
- Page 113 and 114: Third countriesEU documents sometim
- Page 115: Author: Nina ObuljenEditor: Janet H