d) (<strong>European</strong> Commission (2003).Commission Green Paper <strong>of</strong> 21 May 2003on services <strong>of</strong> general interest. COM (2003)270 final. Brussels; or <strong>European</strong> Forum for<strong>the</strong> Arts and Heritage (EFAH and Interarts),(2003). Report on <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong>cooperation in Europe, EFAH, Interarts,October.7 The `new member states’, which joined <strong>the</strong><strong>EU</strong> in <strong>the</strong> accession <strong>of</strong> 2004, <strong>we</strong>re CzechRepublic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia, plus Cyprus(<strong>the</strong> Greek part) and Malta. Post-accessiondevelopments in Cyprus and Malta haveto be looked at separately as <strong>the</strong>y did notgo through <strong>the</strong> transition from one politicalsystem to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, such as occurred incentral and eastern Europe. Hence <strong>the</strong>y <strong>we</strong>renot included in this study.At present candidate countries includeBulgaria and Romania, which have almostcompleted negotiations, and Croatia andTurkey which have just started negotiationsfor full membership.8 This phenomena is described in politicalscience as policy transfer. See for exampleJames and Lodge, 2003; and Dolowitz andMarsh, 1996.9 According to <strong>the</strong> IMCA (InternationalMedia Consultants Associates) study for <strong>the</strong><strong>European</strong> Commission, published in 2004,A survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> landscapes and <strong>policies</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Community candidatecountries in <strong>the</strong> broadcasting industry, even<strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> broadcasting is under-researched.10 Beside Williams (1976), see alsoKawashima (1995), Gray (1996), Ves<strong>the</strong>im(1995), Hugoson (1997) as <strong>we</strong>ll as morerecent studies by Gordon and Mundy (2001)or Mercer (2002).11 The Council <strong>of</strong> Europe is not an <strong>EU</strong>body. It is an intergovernmental organisation,embracing 46 <strong>European</strong> member countries.See Glossary for more information.12 Around this time <strong>the</strong> United NationsEducational, Scientific and CulturalOrganization (UNESCO) also launchedmore in-depth research on <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>.UNESCO ministerial conferences had beenheld in Venice in 1970 and in Helsinki in 1972.13 Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents adopted by <strong>the</strong>Council <strong>of</strong> Europe since <strong>the</strong> 1970s illustrateits fields <strong>of</strong> interest.- Declaration on <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong>development, 1972- <strong>European</strong> declaration on <strong>cultural</strong>objectives, 1984- Resolution on <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>European</strong> Fund for support <strong>of</strong>co-productions and distribution <strong>of</strong> films andaudio-visual products `Eurimages’, 1988- Declaration `Multi<strong>cultural</strong> society and<strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> identity’, 1990- <strong>European</strong> convention for <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> audio-visual heritage- <strong>European</strong> convention on cinematographicco-productions 1992- <strong>European</strong> charter about regional andminority languages, 1992- Declaration on <strong>European</strong> policy and newinformation technologies, 1999- Declaration on <strong>cultural</strong> diversity 200078Notes
14 When deciding on <strong>the</strong> methodology andscope <strong>of</strong> research, authors used methodologyfrom o<strong>the</strong>r public <strong>policies</strong>: that is, education,higher education, science and research andenvironment, developed in early 1980s within<strong>the</strong> Organization for Economic Cooperationand Development (OECD) (d’Angelo andVespérini 1999).15 The Council <strong>of</strong> Europe brief was forreviews <strong>of</strong> national <strong>cultural</strong> policy.16 Cooperation with <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Europeis explicitly mentioned in <strong>the</strong> paragraph 3<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Article 128 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Maastricht Treatythat became Article 151 in <strong>the</strong> Treaty <strong>of</strong>Amsterdam.17 The Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome in which <strong>the</strong><strong>European</strong> Economic Community was set upand signed by six states: Belgium, France,Italy, Luxembourg, The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands andThe Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany[West Germany].18 In 1973 Denmark, Ireland and UK joined,follo<strong>we</strong>d by Greece in 1981, Spain andPortugal in 1986 and Austria, Finland andS<strong>we</strong>den in 1995. The biggest enlargementoccurred in 2004 with ten new membercountries joining: Cyprus [Greek part], CzechRepublic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia.19 Methodology used for this type <strong>of</strong>research includes, for example, cost-benefitanalysis, SWOT analysis, and o<strong>the</strong>rs. Some<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se methods could also be applied to <strong>the</strong>research <strong>of</strong> culture; cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong>enlargement, for example, could be useful towork out what will happen with <strong>the</strong> opening<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> markets and <strong>the</strong>ir integrationinto a common market. It could show <strong>the</strong><strong>we</strong>aknesses as <strong>we</strong>ll as <strong>the</strong> strengths and <strong>the</strong>competitive potential <strong>of</strong> domestic <strong>cultural</strong>industries compared to <strong>European</strong> ones,and especially <strong>cultural</strong> goods and servicesdistributed by global <strong>cultural</strong> conglomerates.It is most probably still too early for thistype <strong>of</strong> research and it would also demandadequate <strong>cultural</strong> statistics and indicators thatare not available at <strong>the</strong> moment.20 Puchala likens analysts <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong>integration to a group <strong>of</strong> blind men who,while only touching <strong>the</strong> animal, are tryingto describe <strong>the</strong> elephant. As each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mcan touch only one part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elephant, onewill describe <strong>the</strong> elephant as a tall animalbecause he touched <strong>the</strong> trunk, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwill think that <strong>the</strong> elephant is in fact flatbecause he touched its ear. Even though<strong>the</strong>ir individual impressions are wrong, eachhas enough `evidence’ to discuss <strong>the</strong> realappearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elephant and is <strong>the</strong>reforesceptical about <strong>the</strong> facts presented by o<strong>the</strong>rparticipants in <strong>the</strong> discussion (Puchala 1971).21 In <strong>the</strong> introduction to Cultural policyin Croatia: national report. published byStrasbourg: Council for CulturalCo-operation, Katunarić and Cvjetic˘ aninregretted that it was difficult to recognizetoday’s <strong>cultural</strong> sector as a descendant <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> creative <strong>cultural</strong> environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> age<strong>of</strong> Romanticism: `Throughout 20th centurydevelopment important sections <strong>of</strong> cultureNotes79
- Page 1 and 2:
Why we need European cultural polic
- Page 3:
06081116171822252829313737404343454
- Page 6 and 7:
Prologue When I decided to research
- Page 8 and 9:
If I had the opportunity of startin
- Page 10 and 11:
Measures directly referring to cult
- Page 12 and 13:
obstacles encountered during the pe
- Page 14 and 15:
Part 1Theconceptualframe ofthe stud
- Page 16 and 17:
argument referred to identifying ex
- Page 18 and 19:
Gray called for comparative researc
- Page 20 and 21:
The Council of Europe and comparati
- Page 22 and 23:
a broader understanding of culture,
- Page 24 and 25:
The first one is a `macro’ dimens
- Page 26 and 27: Part 2European Union,culture andcul
- Page 28 and 29: narrow sense - still remains exclud
- Page 30 and 31: Niedobitek (see page 29) drew atten
- Page 32 and 33: Even though the author thought that
- Page 34 and 35: In spring 2005 two founding members
- Page 36 and 37: I am focussing more on the technica
- Page 38 and 39: while enlargement negotiations were
- Page 40 and 41: ights.56 Since the mid-1990s, the E
- Page 42 and 43: This included information about Cha
- Page 44 and 45: Gradual development and introductio
- Page 46 and 47: of the background presented earlier
- Page 48 and 49: `Eventually, a solution was found,
- Page 50 and 51: In regard to other taxes, opinions
- Page 52 and 53: meet the recently introduced regula
- Page 54 and 55: introduces the possibility of makin
- Page 56 and 57: One of the recommendations in the F
- Page 58 and 59: IPR legislation into line with Worl
- Page 60 and 61: Preliminary assessmentof the impact
- Page 62 and 63: Changes in taxation policies were n
- Page 64 and 65: policy areas and the ensuing transf
- Page 66 and 67: Part 3What willthe futurebring?68 P
- Page 68 and 69: Manuel Barroso, President of the Eu
- Page 70 and 71: has been embraced by the European m
- Page 73 and 74: Instead of a conclusionThe aim of t
- Page 75: 1 The French term acquis communauta
- Page 79 and 80: 30 OJ C 336, 19/12/1992.31 1st Repo
- Page 81 and 82: 45 After the signing and entry into
- Page 83 and 84: 65 See Annex 1 for a copy of theque
- Page 85 and 86: 81 32001G0731(01) Council Resolutio
- Page 87 and 88: culture, which needs to be exempt f
- Page 89 and 90: Aubry P, (2000)The `Television with
- Page 91 and 92: Draus F, (2001)`Est-Ouest, le dit e
- Page 93 and 94: Futo P, Cuculić J, et al (2002)Met
- Page 95 and 96: Laher L, (2001)Trapped in the notio
- Page 97 and 98: Puchala D J, (1971)`Of blind men, e
- Page 99 and 100: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W, (1997)Euro
- Page 101 and 102: 2. In your opinion, have the cultur
- Page 103 and 104: 13. Have there been any changes in
- Page 105 and 106: Annex 3List of CPRA jury membersMil
- Page 107 and 108: Political Economy Cultural Economic
- Page 109 and 110: Annex 4GlossaryAcquis communautaire
- Page 111 and 112: Cultural marketsA term used to desc
- Page 113 and 114: Third countriesEU documents sometim
- Page 115: Author: Nina ObuljenEditor: Janet H