IMCA [International Media Consultants Associates] for <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Commission (2004)A survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> landscapes and political <strong>policies</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Community candidatecountries in <strong>the</strong> broadcasting industry: Executive report.Brussels: <strong>European</strong> Commission DG EAC 59/02.Ilczuk D, (2001)Cultural citizenship: Civil society and <strong>cultural</strong> policy in Europe,Amsterdam: Boekmanstudies.Inkei P, Langusi D, Szabo J, (2004)Culture 2000 with eastern eyes: <strong>cultural</strong> co-operation bet<strong>we</strong>en old, new and future<strong>EU</strong> members – a statistical analysis.The Budapest Observatory: www.budobs.orgInotai A, and von Solemacher H, (eds) (2004)Europe beyond <strong>the</strong> first wave <strong>of</strong> eastern enlargement Papers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional scientific seminar,Pécs, 21-22 October 2003.Budapest: Institute for World Economics.James O, Lodge M, (2003)`The limitations <strong>of</strong> ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ from public policy research.’Political Studies Review, vol 1, 179–193.Jelić T, (2003)`Pravni akti Europske unije.’ Informator, Zagreb, 5167.Jelić T, (2003)`Harmonizacija hrvatskoga medijskog zakonodavstva s europskim.’ in:Medijsko zakonodavstvo Republike Hrvatske. Antolović J ed,Zagreb: Biblioteka Kulturni razvitak, velika edicija, knjiga 6.Katunarić V, Cvjetic˘anin B, (1999)Cultural policy in Croatia: national report.Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-operation. Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Publishing.Kaufman T, Raunig G, (2002)Anticipating <strong>European</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>.Vienna: <strong>European</strong> Institute for Progressive Cultural Policy.Kawashima N, (1995)`Comparing <strong>cultural</strong> policy: towards <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> comparative study.’International Journal <strong>of</strong> Cultural Policy, vol 1(2), 289–307.96References
Laher L, (2001)Trapped in <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> subsidiarity. Paper given at a <strong>European</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Artists’ conference,`Borderless vs national perspectives in <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>of</strong> art and culture – art for sale?’Visegrad, Hungary, October 2001.www.eca.dkLandau M, (1977)`The proper domain <strong>of</strong> policy analysis.’ in Bobrow D B, Eulau H, et al, (1977).`The place <strong>of</strong> policy analysis in political science: Five perspectives.’American Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Science Vol 21, no 2, (May) pp 415–433Landry C, Matarasso F, (1999)`Balancing act: t<strong>we</strong>nty-one strategic dilemmas in <strong>cultural</strong> policy.’Cultural Policy note 4, Cultural Policies Research and Development Unit,Strasbourg: Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Publishing.Macmillan F, (2004)‘The exceptions to freedom <strong>of</strong> movement for culture: copyright.’Paper given at Annual Congress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> Law,3-4 December (Trier)Mercer C, (2004)`From data to wisdom: building <strong>the</strong> knowledge base for <strong>cultural</strong> policy.’Insight: a <strong>policies</strong> for culture analysis and opinion reporter,no.3/December. www.<strong>policies</strong>forculture.orgMercer C, (2002)Towards <strong>cultural</strong> citizenship: Tools for <strong>cultural</strong> policy and development.Stockholm: The Bank <strong>of</strong> S<strong>we</strong>den Tercentenary Foundation and Gidlunds Forlag, Hedemora.Mercouris P, (2002)Structural funds, enlargement and <strong>the</strong> culture sector.A discussion paper for <strong>European</strong> Forum for <strong>the</strong> Arts and Cultural Heritage (EFAH).www.efah.orgMKW Wirtschaftsforschung Gmbh, (2001)Exploitations and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> job potential in <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sector in <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong>digitalisation: Final report.Munich: MKW Wirtschaftsforschung Gmbh.Mucica D, (2003)Cultural legislation: <strong>Why</strong>? How? What?.Strasbourg: Council <strong>of</strong> Europe Publishing.References97
- Page 1 and 2:
Why we need European cultural polic
- Page 3:
06081116171822252829313737404343454
- Page 6 and 7:
Prologue When I decided to research
- Page 8 and 9:
If I had the opportunity of startin
- Page 10 and 11:
Measures directly referring to cult
- Page 12 and 13:
obstacles encountered during the pe
- Page 14 and 15:
Part 1Theconceptualframe ofthe stud
- Page 16 and 17:
argument referred to identifying ex
- Page 18 and 19:
Gray called for comparative researc
- Page 20 and 21:
The Council of Europe and comparati
- Page 22 and 23:
a broader understanding of culture,
- Page 24 and 25:
The first one is a `macro’ dimens
- Page 26 and 27:
Part 2European Union,culture andcul
- Page 28 and 29:
narrow sense - still remains exclud
- Page 30 and 31:
Niedobitek (see page 29) drew atten
- Page 32 and 33:
Even though the author thought that
- Page 34 and 35:
In spring 2005 two founding members
- Page 36 and 37:
I am focussing more on the technica
- Page 38 and 39:
while enlargement negotiations were
- Page 40 and 41:
ights.56 Since the mid-1990s, the E
- Page 42 and 43:
This included information about Cha
- Page 44 and 45: Gradual development and introductio
- Page 46 and 47: of the background presented earlier
- Page 48 and 49: `Eventually, a solution was found,
- Page 50 and 51: In regard to other taxes, opinions
- Page 52 and 53: meet the recently introduced regula
- Page 54 and 55: introduces the possibility of makin
- Page 56 and 57: One of the recommendations in the F
- Page 58 and 59: IPR legislation into line with Worl
- Page 60 and 61: Preliminary assessmentof the impact
- Page 62 and 63: Changes in taxation policies were n
- Page 64 and 65: policy areas and the ensuing transf
- Page 66 and 67: Part 3What willthe futurebring?68 P
- Page 68 and 69: Manuel Barroso, President of the Eu
- Page 70 and 71: has been embraced by the European m
- Page 73 and 74: Instead of a conclusionThe aim of t
- Page 75 and 76: 1 The French term acquis communauta
- Page 77 and 78: 14 When deciding on the methodology
- Page 79 and 80: 30 OJ C 336, 19/12/1992.31 1st Repo
- Page 81 and 82: 45 After the signing and entry into
- Page 83 and 84: 65 See Annex 1 for a copy of theque
- Page 85 and 86: 81 32001G0731(01) Council Resolutio
- Page 87 and 88: culture, which needs to be exempt f
- Page 89 and 90: Aubry P, (2000)The `Television with
- Page 91 and 92: Draus F, (2001)`Est-Ouest, le dit e
- Page 93: Futo P, Cuculić J, et al (2002)Met
- Page 97 and 98: Puchala D J, (1971)`Of blind men, e
- Page 99 and 100: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W, (1997)Euro
- Page 101 and 102: 2. In your opinion, have the cultur
- Page 103 and 104: 13. Have there been any changes in
- Page 105 and 106: Annex 3List of CPRA jury membersMil
- Page 107 and 108: Political Economy Cultural Economic
- Page 109 and 110: Annex 4GlossaryAcquis communautaire
- Page 111 and 112: Cultural marketsA term used to desc
- Page 113 and 114: Third countriesEU documents sometim
- Page 115: Author: Nina ObuljenEditor: Janet H