Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
Why we need European cultural policies: the impact of EU ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
meet <strong>the</strong> recently introduced regulations on state aid. This would represent a positive incentiveand bring much <strong>need</strong>ed transparency in film industry financing. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver, it was likely to provokenegative reactions from film directors and producers, because for many decades a direct statesubsidy was almost <strong>the</strong> only source <strong>of</strong> funding for feature films. This is a typical example <strong>of</strong>indirect <strong>impact</strong> on <strong>cultural</strong> policy, in which <strong>the</strong> indirect influence <strong>of</strong> harmonization <strong>of</strong> laws insome o<strong>the</strong>r policy area – in this instance, state aid – has been changing <strong>the</strong> environment for<strong>cultural</strong> production.Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> artist:free movement <strong>of</strong> people, social securityAn overview <strong>of</strong> existing literature as <strong>we</strong>ll as insights picked up from various conference reportsand <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> networks and pr<strong>of</strong>essional organizations has shown that <strong>the</strong> questions <strong>of</strong>free movement <strong>of</strong> people and social security regulations have been debated mostly in <strong>the</strong> context<strong>of</strong> enhancing artists’ mobility in <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sector. Audéoud made a clear distinction bet<strong>we</strong>en`obstacles’ and `hindrances’ to <strong>the</strong> mobility <strong>of</strong> artists (Audéoud 2002). According to <strong>the</strong> results<strong>of</strong> his study <strong>the</strong>re are comparatively few rules and practices preventing <strong>cultural</strong> workers and <strong>the</strong>irproducts from moving around <strong>the</strong> Community area which can be said to constitute real obstaclesto <strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> movement.More numerous, ho<strong>we</strong>ver, are <strong>the</strong> shortcomings or o<strong>the</strong>r constraints which hamper or are adisincentive to mobility, without actually constituting an obstacle (Audéoud ibid). Audéoud’sresearch sho<strong>we</strong>d that numerous obstacles existed already among `old’ member states, and that allkinds <strong>of</strong> artists and <strong>cultural</strong> workers from <strong>the</strong> new member states have had to deal with additionalrestrictions to opportunities for <strong>the</strong>ir nationals to obtain work in <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong>.The questionnaire yielded a range <strong>of</strong> responses when it asked, `Can artists and <strong>cultural</strong> workersfrom your country freely obtain work in o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>EU</strong> countries without any restrictions?’.`The issue is complex. On one side artists and <strong>cultural</strong> workers through workgrants and scholarships, may work and study abroad. What’s more, <strong>the</strong>re is apossibility, except getting money for journeys, to get a residency status.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side, some countries have restricted <strong>the</strong> possibility for Polishcitizens to obtain work in <strong>the</strong>ir country for <strong>the</strong> future few years (this appliesto all pr<strong>of</strong>essions).’(Poland)54Part 2 The <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> enlargement: results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>of</strong> researchers and policy-makers