Preliminary assessment<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>EU</strong> enlargementThe results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> questionnaire confirmed <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> most studies and articles on <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong>culture in <strong>the</strong> enlargement. The general perception has been that <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong>’s enlargement did nothave much <strong>impact</strong> on <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong> in those countries <strong>of</strong> central and eastern Europe which hadjoined <strong>the</strong> Union in 2004.During <strong>the</strong> run-up to accession artists and <strong>cultural</strong> operators in those countries <strong>we</strong>re notspecifically targeted by information campaigns and <strong>the</strong>re was very little information as to what <strong>the</strong>accession might bring to this sector. On <strong>the</strong> whole people working in <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sectors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>countries which <strong>we</strong>re joining <strong>the</strong> Union supported <strong>the</strong> move to join it.There was very little assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible consequences <strong>of</strong> enlargement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> on <strong>the</strong>countries which <strong>we</strong>re becoming members. Several authors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> individual countries, in<strong>the</strong> Compendium <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong> and trends in Europe, ho<strong>we</strong>ver, suggested that accession to<strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> had been directly linked to <strong>the</strong> development and reform <strong>of</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> policy in <strong>the</strong>ir respectivecountries (ERICarts/Council <strong>of</strong> Europe, 2005).The author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hungarian country report, for example, claimed that <strong>the</strong> protracted process <strong>of</strong>joining <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> Union was a major factor in shaping <strong>cultural</strong> policy in Hungary, although<strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accession itself has yet to be assessed. He also acknowledges that <strong>the</strong><strong>EU</strong> demands comply with international standards in certain areas, while o<strong>the</strong>rs are left to bedetermined internally.The author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Slovenian country pr<strong>of</strong>ile concluded that although `culture’ still enjoys somespecial attention from Slovenia’s politicians, it is largely rhetorical and <strong>the</strong> new social climate hasmeant that culture has been pushed to <strong>the</strong> margins <strong>of</strong> political agenda-setting. According to <strong>the</strong>preliminary assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enlargement on economic and social climate inSlovenia, much had changed.A year after enlargement, economic indicators in <strong>the</strong> post-socialist countries <strong>we</strong>re slowlyimproving, and <strong>the</strong> market economy and <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> law <strong>we</strong>re becoming stronger. Even though<strong>the</strong>se countries <strong>we</strong>re economically still lagging behind old member states and will not catch upin <strong>the</strong> short-term, overall public attitudes towards accession has remained optimistic. Because <strong>of</strong>62Part 2 Preliminary assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> enlargement
inherited problems and challenges <strong>of</strong> overcoming <strong>the</strong> transition crisis, <strong>the</strong>re has been pressureto reduce public spending, to privatize state-owned companies and to undertake o<strong>the</strong>r reformsnecessary to achieve a functioning market economy.It is still too early to see many specific changes in <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong> that have resulted from <strong>the</strong>economic reforms and <strong>the</strong>re have been very few areas in which <strong>the</strong>re have been explicit requestsfor reforms in <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> field. To sum up: <strong>the</strong>re is still almost no information about <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> enlargement on culture, o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> funding programmes.92General conclusions from <strong>the</strong> existing literature and from <strong>the</strong> responses to <strong>the</strong> questionnaireshow that <strong>the</strong>re has been, ho<strong>we</strong>ver, an <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> some kind on <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>: sometimespositive, sometimes negative.Cultural changes at several levelsGenerally speaking, changes influenced by accession to <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> have been and are taking placeat two levels.First, accession has required in some areas, direct reform <strong>of</strong> national <strong>cultural</strong> policy. These havebeen visible and easy to assess, as with audio-visual or copyright policy. In <strong>the</strong>se circumstances,because <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> accession has been ei<strong>the</strong>r exclusively focussed on a <strong>cultural</strong> topic,or because certain regulations could have been predicted to impinge on <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>policies</strong>, thisinfluence has in some ways taken <strong>the</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sector into consideration. Ho<strong>we</strong>ver,even in those examples, <strong>the</strong> short-term effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reforms may have been positive or negative;it is unlikely that <strong>the</strong>re could ever have been a `one-size-fits-all’ solution.Indirect changes <strong>we</strong>re, ho<strong>we</strong>ver, more difficult to identify and assess. Any <strong>impact</strong> <strong>the</strong>y may havehad – whe<strong>the</strong>r positive or negative – has lagged behind <strong>the</strong> more direct reforms. They hardly tookaccount <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> sector, and have been able to override <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong>subsidiarity or <strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> field from harmonization.Evidence from <strong>the</strong> questionnaireThe questionnaire’s results pointed to some <strong>of</strong> those direct and indirect changes in <strong>cultural</strong> policy,which occurred in <strong>the</strong> new member states or is taking place now in <strong>the</strong> candidate countries, thatis, those which are in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> negotiating to join.Those which <strong>we</strong>re in some ways easiest to identify <strong>we</strong>re <strong>the</strong> audio-visual sector and intellectualproperty rights (IPR), as <strong>the</strong>y <strong>we</strong>re both covered by <strong>the</strong> acquis communautaire and <strong>the</strong>re <strong>we</strong>reincentives and guidelines for new member states and some technical assistance. It was clear,ho<strong>we</strong>ver, that even here, <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> accession to <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong> could not be separated from <strong>the</strong>general reforms which ensued as <strong>the</strong>se countries transformed <strong>the</strong>mselves in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong>communism. For example, to assess <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> accession in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> IPR was complicatedby <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> transition countries <strong>we</strong>re already having to align <strong>the</strong>ir legislation with o<strong>the</strong>rinternational regulations from WIPO and <strong>the</strong> WTO. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong>re was data available.Preliminary assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>EU</strong> enlargement63
- Page 1 and 2:
Why we need European cultural polic
- Page 3:
06081116171822252829313737404343454
- Page 6 and 7:
Prologue When I decided to research
- Page 8 and 9:
If I had the opportunity of startin
- Page 10 and 11: Measures directly referring to cult
- Page 12 and 13: obstacles encountered during the pe
- Page 14 and 15: Part 1Theconceptualframe ofthe stud
- Page 16 and 17: argument referred to identifying ex
- Page 18 and 19: Gray called for comparative researc
- Page 20 and 21: The Council of Europe and comparati
- Page 22 and 23: a broader understanding of culture,
- Page 24 and 25: The first one is a `macro’ dimens
- Page 26 and 27: Part 2European Union,culture andcul
- Page 28 and 29: narrow sense - still remains exclud
- Page 30 and 31: Niedobitek (see page 29) drew atten
- Page 32 and 33: Even though the author thought that
- Page 34 and 35: In spring 2005 two founding members
- Page 36 and 37: I am focussing more on the technica
- Page 38 and 39: while enlargement negotiations were
- Page 40 and 41: ights.56 Since the mid-1990s, the E
- Page 42 and 43: This included information about Cha
- Page 44 and 45: Gradual development and introductio
- Page 46 and 47: of the background presented earlier
- Page 48 and 49: `Eventually, a solution was found,
- Page 50 and 51: In regard to other taxes, opinions
- Page 52 and 53: meet the recently introduced regula
- Page 54 and 55: introduces the possibility of makin
- Page 56 and 57: One of the recommendations in the F
- Page 58 and 59: IPR legislation into line with Worl
- Page 62 and 63: Changes in taxation policies were n
- Page 64 and 65: policy areas and the ensuing transf
- Page 66 and 67: Part 3What willthe futurebring?68 P
- Page 68 and 69: Manuel Barroso, President of the Eu
- Page 70 and 71: has been embraced by the European m
- Page 73 and 74: Instead of a conclusionThe aim of t
- Page 75 and 76: 1 The French term acquis communauta
- Page 77 and 78: 14 When deciding on the methodology
- Page 79 and 80: 30 OJ C 336, 19/12/1992.31 1st Repo
- Page 81 and 82: 45 After the signing and entry into
- Page 83 and 84: 65 See Annex 1 for a copy of theque
- Page 85 and 86: 81 32001G0731(01) Council Resolutio
- Page 87 and 88: culture, which needs to be exempt f
- Page 89 and 90: Aubry P, (2000)The `Television with
- Page 91 and 92: Draus F, (2001)`Est-Ouest, le dit e
- Page 93 and 94: Futo P, Cuculić J, et al (2002)Met
- Page 95 and 96: Laher L, (2001)Trapped in the notio
- Page 97 and 98: Puchala D J, (1971)`Of blind men, e
- Page 99 and 100: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W, (1997)Euro
- Page 101 and 102: 2. In your opinion, have the cultur
- Page 103 and 104: 13. Have there been any changes in
- Page 105 and 106: Annex 3List of CPRA jury membersMil
- Page 107 and 108: Political Economy Cultural Economic
- Page 109 and 110: Annex 4GlossaryAcquis communautaire
- Page 111 and 112:
Cultural marketsA term used to desc
- Page 113 and 114:
Third countriesEU documents sometim
- Page 115:
Author: Nina ObuljenEditor: Janet H