04.12.2012 Views

MEP-Technical Manual CDN 0408.qxd - Hambro

MEP-Technical Manual CDN 0408.qxd - Hambro

MEP-Technical Manual CDN 0408.qxd - Hambro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND CALCULATIONS<br />

For a uniformly loaded joist, the average interface shear s,<br />

at ultimate load when calculated by ultimate strength<br />

principles, would be:<br />

s = 2T u<br />

L<br />

......................................................... (B)<br />

and would represent the average shear force, per unit<br />

length, between the points of zero and maximum moment.<br />

Some modification to this formula would occur when the<br />

strain neutral axis at failure would be located within<br />

the section. As this modification is slight and would only<br />

occur with bottom chord areas greater that 1 185 mm 2 ,<br />

it is neglected.<br />

The following compares the elastic and ultimate approaches:<br />

Since M u = T u d u equation (B) can be rewritten:<br />

s = 2M u<br />

d u L<br />

......................................................... (C)<br />

Also, for a uniformly distributed load,<br />

Mu =<br />

......................................................... (D)<br />

VuL 4<br />

Subscipts u, are added to equation (A) to represent the<br />

arbitrary “q” force at failure:<br />

q u = V u Q<br />

I c<br />

Combining (C) and (E) results in:<br />

q u = d u L x V u Q<br />

s<br />

2M u<br />

......................................................... (E)<br />

and, substituting (D) into equation (F),<br />

q u = 2Qd u<br />

s<br />

I c<br />

I c<br />

.............................................. (F)<br />

...................................................... (G)<br />

The value I c /Qd u has been calculated for the various<br />

<strong>Hambro</strong> composite joist sizes. It is constant, and = 1.1.<br />

Substituting this in (G), gives:<br />

qu = 1.82<br />

s<br />

This verifies that q and s are closely related and that the<br />

interface shear force does, in fact, vary from a maximum at<br />

zero moment (maximum vertical shear) to a minimum at<br />

maximum moment (zero vertical shear).<br />

The more recent full testing programs have consistently<br />

established a failure value for the horizontal bearing forces<br />

and the friction between steel and concrete. An additional<br />

contributing factor is a hole in the section at each 178 mm<br />

on the length.<br />

(i) Horizontal bearing forces<br />

The test has defined an ultimate value for the<br />

end bearing shoe Bu = 222 kN for a concrete<br />

strength = 20 MPa<br />

(ii) Friction between steel and top chord<br />

The failure value for the interface shear<br />

qu = 36.9 N/mm. This is sometimes converted<br />

to “bond stress” u = q / embedded S perimeter<br />

= q /178 mm. Hence, the ultimate “bond stress”<br />

u = 36.9 / 178 = 207 kPa.<br />

The safety limiting interface shear is defined by<br />

using a safety factor of 2 on point (i) and (ii).<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!