06.12.2012 Views

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Information systems have improved vastly in the last 25 years and statistical data are<br />

now more easily available, intensified by an increasing sensitivity to disaster occurrence<br />

and consequences. Nevertheless there are still discrepancies. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the quality<br />

and accuracy <strong>of</strong> disaster data, performed by CRED in 2002, showed that occasionally,<br />

for the same disaster, differences <strong>of</strong> more than 20 per cent may exist between the<br />

quantitative data reported by the three major databases – EM-DAT (CRED), NatCat<br />

(Munich Re) and Sigma (Swiss Re).<br />

Despite efforts to verify and review data, the quality <strong>of</strong> disaster databases can only be<br />

as good as the reporting system. This, combined with the different aims <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

major disaster databases (risk and economic risk analysis for reinsurance companies,<br />

development agenda for CRED), may explain differences between data provided for<br />

some disasters. However, in spite <strong>of</strong> these differences, the overall trends indicated by<br />

the three databases remain similar.<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> systematization and standardization <strong>of</strong> data collection is a major weakness<br />

when it comes to long-term planning. Fortunately, due to increased pressures<br />

for accountability from various sources, many donors and development agencies have<br />

started paying attention to data collection and its methodologies.<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the solution to this data problem lies in retrospective analysis. Data are most<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten publicly quoted and reported during a disaster event, but it is only long after<br />

the event, once the relief operation is over, that estimates <strong>of</strong> damage and death can be<br />

verified. Some data gatherers, like CRED, revisit the data; this accounts for retrospective<br />

annual disaster figures changing one, two and sometimes even three years after the<br />

event.<br />

Philippe Hoyois, senior research fellow with CRED, Regina Below, manager <strong>of</strong> CRED’s<br />

EM-DAT disaster database, and Debarati Guha-Sapir, director <strong>of</strong> CRED, prepared<br />

the statistics annex. For further information, please contact: Centre for Research on the<br />

Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disasters</strong> (CRED), School <strong>of</strong> Public Health, Catholic University <strong>of</strong><br />

Louvain, 30.94, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, 1200 Brussels, Belgium, tel.: +32 2 764<br />

3327, fax: +32 2 764 3441, e-mail: contact@emdat.be, web site: www.emdat.be<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Disasters</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong> – Disaster data<br />

ANNEX 1<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!