06.12.2012 Views

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

World Disasters Report 2010 - International Federation of Red Cross ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2<br />

40<br />

The index is most heavily influenced first <strong>of</strong> all by values <strong>of</strong> exposed assets and their<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> vulnerability. Figure 2.4 shows that Tokyo is, by far, the city at highest risk,<br />

followed by San Francisco. Of the 20 highest-risk cities in the index, 17 are in highincome<br />

countries. This makes sense given that the index is trying to gauge the risk for<br />

insurers and thus the value <strong>of</strong> exposed assets, which is greater in high-income countries<br />

and is an important factor in understanding the potential for economic losses in a<br />

disaster.<br />

The index shows that for large disasters, the economic costs are <strong>of</strong>ten much higher<br />

in high-income nations and much <strong>of</strong> this will be in urban areas, but this is not<br />

an indicator <strong>of</strong> how many people faced serious economic losses and did not have<br />

insurance. The index does not at all convey the reality that very large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

low-income urban dwellers can lose their homes and most or all their assets from<br />

disasters; the total monetary value <strong>of</strong> this is small but the hardships on individuals<br />

and families are immense.<br />

Vision two: Flood exposure in port cities<br />

An index published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development<br />

ranks 136 port cities <strong>of</strong> over 1 million population with high exposure to one-in-100year,<br />

surge-induced flood events. It looks at the exposure <strong>of</strong> population and assets, in<br />

2005 and those predicted in 2070. Future predictions account for population growth,<br />

urbanization, ground subsidence and climatic changes.<br />

Population growth and investment in urban infrastructure are the most important<br />

drivers for increase in exposure to surge-induced floods. This is especially true in developing<br />

regions, which are expected to have large growth. Overall, without any increase<br />

in water levels, asset exposure could grow eight-fold. Climate changes, as predicted<br />

by the Fourth Assessment <strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,<br />

including increased storm intensity and sea-level rise, also influence increased exposure.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> human-induced subsidence due to shallow groundwater extraction<br />

is especially important in deltaic cities that are rapidly developing.<br />

The index overwhelmingly shows that cities in Asia have the highest exposure to surgeinduced<br />

flooding now and in the future. Of the 20 cities with the highest population<br />

exposure in 2005, half are in low- and middle-income nations in Asia. In real numbers,<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the total 38.5 million people currently exposed, 65 per cent <strong>of</strong> them live in<br />

Asian cities. Figure 2.5 shows the top 20 world port cities with exposed populations<br />

in 2005. In the 2070s, the index predicts that 17 out <strong>of</strong> the 20 cities with the highest<br />

population exposure will be in present-day low- and middle-income countries and<br />

14 out <strong>of</strong> 20 <strong>of</strong> the cities will be in Asia (four in China and two in Bangladesh). Asia’s<br />

increasing dominance in terms <strong>of</strong> population and asset exposure is a result <strong>of</strong> increased<br />

urbanization and economic growth during the period, compared with other regions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!