06.12.2012 Views

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MK47<br />

AN IMPROVED CHORTLE PULSE SEQU<strong>ENC</strong>E<br />

GERALD A. PEARSON<br />

CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF IOWA<br />

IOWA CITY, IOWA 52242<br />

We have developed s pulse sequence which substantially<br />

improves <strong>th</strong>e accuracy and resolution of <strong>th</strong>e CHORTLE (I)<br />

experiment. (Carbon-Hydrogen correlations from One-<br />

dimensional polaRization-Transfer spectra by LEast-squares<br />

analysis) One can now adjust tCH, <strong>th</strong>e net evolution time<br />

for dcm prior to polarization transfer, independently o£<br />

tM,max, <strong>th</strong>e maximum net evolution time for proton chemical<br />

shift, 6H. Using tN,max m 10 msec, CHORTLE now routinely<br />

measures 6H wi<strong>th</strong> an error ~(~H) ~ I HZ, and resolves non-<br />

equivalent geminal me<strong>th</strong>ylene protons whose chemical shifts<br />

differ by only 30 Hz. Exploratory CHORTLE experiments wi<strong>th</strong><br />

longer tH,max have achieved ¢(6H) ~ 0.2 Hz in favorable<br />

cases, and it should be possible to achieve ~(6H) s 0.02 Hz<br />

in special cases, wi<strong>th</strong> a IH spectrum wid<strong>th</strong> ~ 5000 Hzl<br />

In its orlElnal form, <strong>th</strong>e CHORTLE experiment typically<br />

yielded ~(6H) ~ 3 Hz, end frequently could not resolve non-<br />

equivalent gemlnal protons whose chemical shifts differ by<br />

less <strong>th</strong>an about 70 Hz. This was because tM.max = tCH, and<br />

tcH is restricted to values which optimize <strong>th</strong>e polarization-<br />

transfer efficiency. Wi<strong>th</strong> tcH ~ I/2JcH, tH,max was only 3.2<br />

meec. Tzeng(2) pointed out <strong>th</strong>at it is possible to<br />

circumvent <strong>th</strong>is limitation by setting tcH = 3/2JcH, 5/2dcs,<br />

etc., in exactly <strong>th</strong>e same way <strong>th</strong>at Reynolds and o<strong>th</strong>ers TM<br />

re-parameterized <strong>th</strong>e COLOC c4) sequence. Unfortunately,<br />

increasing tcs has <strong>th</strong>ree disadvantages. First of all,<br />

errors arising from unwanted long-range polarization<br />

transfer remain approximately constant, ra<strong>th</strong>er <strong>th</strong>an<br />

decreasing wi<strong>th</strong> increasinE tH,ma,. Secondly, <strong>th</strong>e desired<br />

polarization-transfer efficiency becomes more sensitive to<br />

<strong>th</strong>e value of Jcs; since Jcs can vary from 118 Hz to 220 Hz<br />

or more in some samples, <strong>th</strong>is will inevitably lead to loss<br />

of sensitivity for some signals. Finally, only certain<br />

values of ts,max are possible (ca. 10 msec, 16.5, 23, ...)<br />

wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>is approach. The new pulse sequence permits one to<br />

choose ts,max to be a truly optimum compromise between<br />

desired accuracy and <strong>th</strong>e sensitivity losses caused by IH<br />

relaxation and IH multiplet dephasing arising from IH-IH<br />

coupling.<br />

1. G.A.F~Ju~SON, J.~oN.RZSON. 6,4, 48T (1~).<br />

2. C.S.TzENo, UNIV. (:~ C~U-IF. AT RI~ERSI2* I~IVATI[ CC]I,~I~.ATION.<br />

3. W.F.REYNOLDS, D.W.HUOMES, M.I~A,'XOK-I~, AND R.G.EN~xOUEZm<br />

J.I'IAoN.RZ~w~N. 64, 304 (1985).<br />

4. H.I~S~.~R, C.CW~IESI~R, J . ~ ( ~ , AND H.R.I-~I,<br />

J.MA(Nw. REIwmw. 6"/', 331 (1~34).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!