06.12.2012 Views

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

th  - 1987 - 51st ENC Conference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WK32<br />

C~4IC~L EXCHANGE IN METAL £X/JSTE~.<br />

ANALYSIS WITH 2D LINEAR PREDICTION<br />

AND DIRECT ANALYSIS OF THE RATE MATRIX.<br />

Bruc~ A. ~ ' , J. A. Mallkayil, m~d Ian M. Azmltag~<br />

Depa~ :,,-~-,L,~ of Mblecular Biophysics and Biochemistry<br />

snd Diagnostic Radiology<br />

Yale Urul.ver~l.ty School of M~dicine<br />

Nma Haven, CT 06515<br />

NMR me<strong>th</strong>cKis are well suited tD <strong>th</strong>e mMsurEm~nt of c~mnical exchange<br />

~ . In many ~ , ~ , such as <strong>th</strong>e less sensitive metal<br />

nuclei <strong>th</strong>at may be found in blomolecules, low signal to noise ratio may<br />

significantly hamper <strong>th</strong>e aommrate msasure of exchange rates. To<br />

ov~-~ome <strong>th</strong>is ~ have applied ~o recen%ly repcn-hed me<strong>th</strong>ods o£ NMR data<br />

analysis in <strong>th</strong>ese areas. As an alternative to <strong>th</strong>e Fourier transform,<br />

we used <strong>th</strong>e me<strong>th</strong>od of linear prediction wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e s/ngular value<br />

deocmposit/nn (LPSVD) I . This me<strong>th</strong>od is potentially capable of<br />

signal fru, noise in <strong>th</strong>e time series data, resulting in<br />

a noise free result. ~ , ~ have used <strong>th</strong>e me<strong>th</strong>od for two-<br />

dimensional arm~lysis where its ability to elim/nate truncati~<br />

artifacts allows <strong>th</strong>e use of fe~.r points in t2 and in %/. This reduces<br />

<strong>th</strong>e size of <strong>th</strong>e 2D data set and minimizes experimsntal time. Analysis<br />

in <strong>th</strong>is way gives directly <strong>th</strong>e amplitude of <strong>th</strong>e peaks required for <strong>th</strong>e<br />

chemical exchange calculations wi<strong>th</strong>out <strong>th</strong>e need for integration. As<br />

apodization funct/ons are not used, <strong>th</strong>ere is no resulting distortion of<br />

peak intensity which might occur wi<strong>th</strong> normal 2D FT processed data sets.<br />

For bo<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e one and %~o dimensional analyses wi<strong>th</strong> LPSVD, we polish <strong>th</strong>e<br />

output data (frequency, dscsy, phase, and amplitude) wi<strong>th</strong> a non-lirear<br />

minimization. The calculated peaks from a single 2D data set are <strong>th</strong>en<br />

used %o form a matrix of intensities <strong>th</strong>at is analyzed using a recently<br />

described matrix dia~mLlization p r ~ .<br />

We will illustrate <strong>th</strong>e use of <strong>th</strong>is me<strong>th</strong>od wi<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e analysis of metal<br />

excha~/8 in <strong>th</strong>e dscanuclear cadmium-i±iolate complex,<br />

C~0(SO~O~O)*s(N~ )4" In <strong>th</strong>e solid state, <strong>th</strong>ree distinct Cd sites<br />

have been identified in <strong>th</strong>e sulfate form of <strong>th</strong>is complex by X-ray<br />

crystallography and by solid state 1'3Od NMR s~-troscc~py- The <strong>th</strong>ree<br />

sites, site A, site B, and site C have Oi~, OdS4, and CdS40<br />

oocrdinations respectively 3 . In solution, site B and site C are in<br />

fast exchange and <strong>th</strong>erefore a single 113 Cd resonazK~ is observed for<br />

<strong>th</strong>ese sites" The results of our 2D chemical exchange studies have<br />

fur<strong>th</strong>er established, for <strong>th</strong>e first time, metal exchange between site A<br />

and <strong>th</strong>e o<strong>th</strong>er two sites. It is <strong>th</strong>e kinetics of <strong>th</strong>e latter exchange<br />

<strong>th</strong>at we will describe using <strong>th</strong>e oombined LPSVD and <strong>th</strong>e matrix<br />

diagm~alization proosdures described above.<br />

i) ~Jsen, H. 1985, O. Mag. Res. 61:465<br />

2) Perrin C. L. and Gipe, R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:4036<br />

Johnston, E. R. and Chert, D. 2~ h ~C ~ Abstract.<br />

Abel, E. W. et al. 1986, J. Mag. Res. 70:34<br />

3) Murphy, D.P. et al. 1981, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103:4400 (and<br />

ref <strong>th</strong>erein)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!