OS-C501
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />
Sec.6 Failure mechanisms and design criteria – Page 127<br />
12.3 Evaluation after impact testing<br />
12.3.1 The impact tests should demonstrate that no unacceptable damage is introduced into the component.<br />
Once the component has been exposed to impact it should be carefully inspected to ensure that no unexpected<br />
failure mechanisms occurred that may reduce the component's performance, in particular long term<br />
performance. If the component will be taken out of service after an impact, long term considerations do not<br />
have to be made.<br />
12.3.2 It shall be shown further that the component can carry all relevant loads after impact until it can be taken<br />
out of service for repair or replacement. This can be done by analysis taking the observed impact damage into<br />
account, by testing, or a combination of analysis and testing. Testing should be done according to Sec.10.<br />
12.3.3 If the component may be exposed to impact but can or should not be repaired afterwards, it should be<br />
shown that the component can withstand all long-term loads with the damage induced by the impact. The same<br />
approach as in [12.3.2] should be used.<br />
Guidance note:<br />
A typical example is impact of dropped objects on a pipe.<br />
The pipe is tested by dropping representative objects, like tools from the maximum possible height onto the pipe.<br />
Damage analysis shows matrix cracking and delamination but no fibre failures. Since the pipe has a liner one could<br />
assume that the capability to hold pressure is not reduced in the short term.<br />
One pressure test is used to confirm this prediction according to Sec.10 [3].<br />
13 Wear<br />
13.1 General<br />
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />
13.1.1 Wear is a complicated process that is influenced by the entire system. All material data used for wear<br />
calculations shall be relevant for the system investigated.<br />
13.2 Calculation of the wear depth<br />
•<br />
13.2.1 The wear depth may be calculated based on the sliding distance, using the length related wear rate w<br />
for the corresponding wear system. The wear rate varies with the surfaces in contact, the magnitude of the<br />
contact pressure and the environment. The wear depth dy (thickness of removed material) is given by:<br />
•<br />
dy<br />
w =<br />
dx<br />
(m/m)<br />
The total sliding distance dx shall be calculated assuming one contact point for the entire duration of the wear<br />
phase.<br />
13.2.2 Another option is to calculate the wear depth based on the sliding time, using the time related wear<br />
•<br />
rate w t<br />
for the corresponding wear system. The wear rate varies with the surfaces in contact, the magnitude of<br />
the contact pressure and the environment. The wear depth dy (thickness of removed material) is given by:<br />
•<br />
dy<br />
w t =<br />
dt<br />
(m/s)<br />
The total sliding time dt shall be calculated assuming the same contact point for the entire duration of the wear<br />
phase.<br />
13.2.3 The consequences of removing material with respect to all other failure mechanisms shall be evaluated.<br />
13.3 Component testing<br />
13.3.1 Refer to section on component testing: Sec.10.<br />
Guidance note:<br />
The performance of a wear system should ideally be assessed by a practical trial in the intended application. However,<br />
this trial is often impractical and it is necessary to resort to laboratory testing. Accelerated laboratory tests with simpler<br />
geometrical configurations are often used although there is still a considerable amount of controversy about the<br />
validity of the results due to the geometry of the test samples.<br />
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />
DET NORSKE VERITAS AS