09.10.2015 Views

OS-C501

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />

Sec.2 Design philosophy and design principles – Page 21<br />

Guidance note:<br />

The following uncertainties are usually considered:<br />

- Uncertainties in the loads, caused by natural variability, which is usually a temporal variability<br />

- Uncertainties in the material properties, caused by natural variability, which is usually a spatial variability<br />

- Uncertainties in the geometrical parameters, caused by<br />

- deviations of the geometrical parameters from their characteristic (normal) value<br />

- tolerance limits<br />

- cumulative effects of a simultaneous occurrence of several geometrical variation<br />

- Uncertainties in the applied engineering models<br />

- uncertainties in the models for representation of the real structure or structural elements<br />

- uncertainties in the models for prediction of loads, owing to simplifications and idealisations made<br />

- uncertainties in the models for prediction of resistance, owing to simplifications and idealisations made<br />

- effect of the sensitivity of the structural system (under- or over-proportional behaviour)<br />

---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />

3.6.2 Partial safety factors are applied in design inequalities for deterministic design as shown by examples in<br />

[3.6.6]. The partial safety factors are usually or preferably calibrated to a specified target reliability by means<br />

of a probabilistic analysis. Sometimes the design inequalities include model factors or bias correction factors<br />

as well. Such model or bias correction factors appear in the inequalities in the same manner as the partial safety<br />

factors, but they are not necessarily to be interpreted as partial safety factors as they are used to correct for<br />

systematic errors rather than accounting for any variability or uncertainty. Model factors and bias correction<br />

factors are usually calibrated experimentally.<br />

3.6.3 The following two types of partial safety factors are used in this standard:<br />

— Partial load effect factors, designated in this standard by γ F .<br />

— Partial resistance factors, designated in this standard by γ M .<br />

3.6.4 In some cases it is useful to work with only one overall safety factor. The uncertainties in loads and<br />

resistance are then accounted for by one common safety factor denoted g FM . The following simple relationship<br />

between this common safety factor on the one hand and the partial load and resistance factors on the other are<br />

assumed here corresponding to the general design inequality quoted in [3.6.6]:<br />

γ FM = γ F x γ M<br />

3.6.5 The following two types of model factors are used in this Standard:<br />

— Load model factors, designated in this Standard by γ Sd .<br />

— Resistance model factors, designated in this Standard by γ Rd .<br />

Guidance note:<br />

- Partial load effect factors γ F are applicable to the characteristic values of the local response of the structure. They<br />

account for uncertainties associated with the variability of the local responses of the structure (local stresses or<br />

strains). The uncertainties in the local response are linked to the uncertainties on the loads applied to the structure<br />

through the transfer function.<br />

- Partial resistance factors γ M account for uncertainties associated with the variability of the strength.<br />

- Load model factors γ Sd account for inaccuracies, idealisations, and biases in the engineering model used for<br />

representation of the real response of the structure, e.g. simplifications in the transfer function (see Sec.9). For<br />

example, wind characterised by a defined wind speed will induce wind loads on the structure, and those loads will<br />

induce local stresses and strains in the structure. The load model factor account for the inaccuracies all the way<br />

from wind speed to local response in the material.<br />

- Resistance model factors γ Rd account for differences between true and predicted resistance values, e.g. differences<br />

between test and in-situ materials properties (size effects), differences associated with the capability of the<br />

manufacturing processes (e.g. deviations of the geometrical parameters from the characteristic value, tolerance<br />

limits on the geometrical parameters), and differences owing to temporal degradation processes.<br />

- Uncertainties or biases in a failure criterion are accounted for by the resistance model factor.<br />

- Geometrical uncertainties and tolerances should be included in the load model factor.<br />

---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />

3.6.6 A factored design load effect is obtained by multiplying a characteristic load effect by a load effect<br />

factor. A factored design resistance is obtained by dividing the characteristic resistance by a resistance factor.<br />

The structural reliability is considered to be satisfactory if the following design inequalities are satisfied:<br />

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!