OS-C501
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />
Sec.2 Design philosophy and design principles – Page 21<br />
Guidance note:<br />
The following uncertainties are usually considered:<br />
- Uncertainties in the loads, caused by natural variability, which is usually a temporal variability<br />
- Uncertainties in the material properties, caused by natural variability, which is usually a spatial variability<br />
- Uncertainties in the geometrical parameters, caused by<br />
- deviations of the geometrical parameters from their characteristic (normal) value<br />
- tolerance limits<br />
- cumulative effects of a simultaneous occurrence of several geometrical variation<br />
- Uncertainties in the applied engineering models<br />
- uncertainties in the models for representation of the real structure or structural elements<br />
- uncertainties in the models for prediction of loads, owing to simplifications and idealisations made<br />
- uncertainties in the models for prediction of resistance, owing to simplifications and idealisations made<br />
- effect of the sensitivity of the structural system (under- or over-proportional behaviour)<br />
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />
3.6.2 Partial safety factors are applied in design inequalities for deterministic design as shown by examples in<br />
[3.6.6]. The partial safety factors are usually or preferably calibrated to a specified target reliability by means<br />
of a probabilistic analysis. Sometimes the design inequalities include model factors or bias correction factors<br />
as well. Such model or bias correction factors appear in the inequalities in the same manner as the partial safety<br />
factors, but they are not necessarily to be interpreted as partial safety factors as they are used to correct for<br />
systematic errors rather than accounting for any variability or uncertainty. Model factors and bias correction<br />
factors are usually calibrated experimentally.<br />
3.6.3 The following two types of partial safety factors are used in this standard:<br />
— Partial load effect factors, designated in this standard by γ F .<br />
— Partial resistance factors, designated in this standard by γ M .<br />
3.6.4 In some cases it is useful to work with only one overall safety factor. The uncertainties in loads and<br />
resistance are then accounted for by one common safety factor denoted g FM . The following simple relationship<br />
between this common safety factor on the one hand and the partial load and resistance factors on the other are<br />
assumed here corresponding to the general design inequality quoted in [3.6.6]:<br />
γ FM = γ F x γ M<br />
3.6.5 The following two types of model factors are used in this Standard:<br />
— Load model factors, designated in this Standard by γ Sd .<br />
— Resistance model factors, designated in this Standard by γ Rd .<br />
Guidance note:<br />
- Partial load effect factors γ F are applicable to the characteristic values of the local response of the structure. They<br />
account for uncertainties associated with the variability of the local responses of the structure (local stresses or<br />
strains). The uncertainties in the local response are linked to the uncertainties on the loads applied to the structure<br />
through the transfer function.<br />
- Partial resistance factors γ M account for uncertainties associated with the variability of the strength.<br />
- Load model factors γ Sd account for inaccuracies, idealisations, and biases in the engineering model used for<br />
representation of the real response of the structure, e.g. simplifications in the transfer function (see Sec.9). For<br />
example, wind characterised by a defined wind speed will induce wind loads on the structure, and those loads will<br />
induce local stresses and strains in the structure. The load model factor account for the inaccuracies all the way<br />
from wind speed to local response in the material.<br />
- Resistance model factors γ Rd account for differences between true and predicted resistance values, e.g. differences<br />
between test and in-situ materials properties (size effects), differences associated with the capability of the<br />
manufacturing processes (e.g. deviations of the geometrical parameters from the characteristic value, tolerance<br />
limits on the geometrical parameters), and differences owing to temporal degradation processes.<br />
- Uncertainties or biases in a failure criterion are accounted for by the resistance model factor.<br />
- Geometrical uncertainties and tolerances should be included in the load model factor.<br />
---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />
3.6.6 A factored design load effect is obtained by multiplying a characteristic load effect by a load effect<br />
factor. A factored design resistance is obtained by dividing the characteristic resistance by a resistance factor.<br />
The structural reliability is considered to be satisfactory if the following design inequalities are satisfied:<br />
DET NORSKE VERITAS AS