09.10.2015 Views

OS-C501

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />

Sec.14 Calculation example: two pressure vessels – Page 197<br />

5.4.5 From the stress rupture formula in [5.4.1] the stress level corresponding to a characteristic life of 125<br />

years is: 163 MPa. Dividing this value by the load-model factor γ Sd gives:<br />

σ j applied =155 MPa , and<br />

ε<br />

j<br />

applied<br />

155 MPa<br />

23 . 7 GPa<br />

This is the same as the largest actual strain (in the fibre directions) ε 1 =0.65%.<br />

5.4.6 The stress rupture behaviour is critical for the design. For a high safety class application the stress rupture<br />

data should be confirmed by testing.<br />

5.4.7 Short-term failure due to maximum loads after 25 years was already considered in [5.3].<br />

5.5 Fibre dominated ply failure due to cyclic fatigue loads (ref. Sec.6 [11])<br />

5.5.1 The characteristic S-N curve for R=0.1 is given by: [ ε( N )] = 0 − 0.101log( N ) (from [4.6.2]).<br />

5.5.2 The number of cycles to fatigue failure shall be checked by the criterion given in Sec.6 [11.3.5]:<br />

γ<br />

fat<br />

5.5.3 The following values are selected for the gas vessel with liner:<br />

γ<br />

Rd<br />

Table 14-22 Fatigue values used for gas vessel with liner<br />

Factors Value Explanation<br />

Number of years for the fatigue evaluation t y 25 years Design life of 25 years<br />

(typically equal to the design life)<br />

The total number of strain conditions N 1 Only one load condition<br />

Number of cycles per year at a particular strain n actual 52 1 cycle per week<br />

condition<br />

Local response of the structure to the strain<br />

condition applied<br />

ε applied<br />

Calculated below<br />

Characteristic number of cycles to failure n charact<br />

Calculated below<br />

under a given strain condition<br />

Load-model factor γ Sd 1.05 Same as before, due to simplifications in<br />

analytical model, see [5.2.4]-[5.2.5]<br />

Partial resistance-model factor γ Rd 0.1 Only one load condition<br />

Partial fatigue safety factor γ fat 50 See Sec.8 [5]<br />

5.5.4 The criterion in [5.5.2] can be evaluated to show that the characteristic number of cycles to failure should<br />

be:<br />

5.5.5 The strain amplitude corresponding to a characteristic life of 6500 cycles with an R ratio of 0.1 is 0.476%<br />

according to [5.5.1]. The maximum strain is then 0.952%. Therefore:<br />

{γ sd ε j applied} = 0.952% and ε j applied = 0.907%<br />

This is more than the largest actual strain (in the fibre directions) ε 1 =0.65%.<br />

=<br />

5.5.6 Fatigue data do not have to be confirmed by testing if the factor γ Rd can be multiplied by 20 (Sec.6<br />

[11.3.8]). In this case the strain amplitude for a life of 6500 x 20 = 130000 cycles should be found. The strain<br />

amplitude with an R ratio of 0.1 is 0.352% according to [5.5.1]. The maximum strain is then 0.704%. Therefore:<br />

{γ sd ε j applied } = 0.704% and ε j applied = 0.67%<br />

This is more than the largest actual strain (in the fibre directions): ε 1 = 0.65%.<br />

t<br />

σ<br />

y<br />

E<br />

j<br />

applied<br />

N<br />

1<br />

∑<br />

j = 1<br />

fibre<br />

Fatigue data do not have to be confirmed by testing, provided the other similarity requirements (from Sec.6<br />

[11.3.8]) are fulfilled.<br />

0 . 65<br />

5.5.7 Short-term failure due to maximum loads after 25 years was already considered in [5.3].<br />

n<br />

n<br />

γ<br />

=<br />

actual<br />

charact<br />

charact<br />

n = t γ<br />

y<br />

fat<br />

=<br />

log . 063<br />

{ γ ε }<br />

j<br />

applied<br />

Sd<br />

<<br />

{ ε } 1<br />

j<br />

applied<br />

Rd<br />

γ<br />

n<br />

Sd<br />

actual<br />

= 6500<br />

%<br />

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!