OS-C501
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />
Sec.9 Structural analysis – Page 155<br />
10.3.8 If core failure of type brittle occurs due to core fracture (in tension or compression), E core shall be<br />
reduced to 0 (default value) or to a positive value as described in [10.3.11].<br />
10.3.9 If core failure of type ductile or plastic occurs due to core shearing , G core * shall be set equal to the<br />
secant modulus at the corresponding τ level; E core * shall be proportionally reduced by the same amount. If τˆcore<br />
is reached, G core and E core shall be reduced to 0 (default value) or to positive values as described in [10.3.11].<br />
10.3.10 If core failure of type brittle occurs due to core shearing, G core shall be reduced to 0 (default value) or<br />
to a positive value as described in [10.3.11].<br />
10.3.11 Instead of using the default value 0 for the parameters in [10.3.7]-[10.3.10], gradual degradation of the<br />
material properties can be used, provided experiments document the validity of values larger than 0 for the<br />
material used.<br />
10.3.12 In numerical calculations certain problems arise, e.g. lack of inversion possibility of the structure<br />
stiffness matrix, when setting degraded material properties equal to 0. Thus, one should apply small values, i.e.<br />
1% of the non-degraded values, instead of 0.<br />
10.3.13 If the non-linear behaviour of the core cannot be modelled properly, the core shall not be used beyond<br />
its yield point and the yield criterion in Sec.6 shall be applied as the ultimate limit state for sandwich failure.<br />
10.4 3-D progressive failure analysis<br />
10.4.1 If the through thickness stresses and through width strains are significant, see [10.1.3], a 3-D<br />
progressive analysis shall be carried out.<br />
10.4.2 A similar progressive failure analysis as presented for monolithic structures in [2.3], shall be carried<br />
out. However, failure mechanisms related to the core, see Sec.6 and [10.3], shall be included.<br />
10.5 Long term damage considerations<br />
10.5.1 The same progressive failure analysis as the one presented in [2.2] and [2.3] shall be carried out using<br />
degraded (long-term) material properties as described in Sec.5 [3].<br />
10.5.2 Degraded material properties shall be used in the calculations of stresses and strains and in the<br />
determination of the strength used in the failure criteria.<br />
11 Buckling<br />
11.1 General<br />
11.1.1 The need for special buckling analysis shall be assessed carefully in every case. In particular the<br />
following aspects shall be considered in making this assessment:<br />
— presence of axial compressive stresses in beam or column-type members or structural elements<br />
— presence of in-plane compressive or shear stresses in flat, plate-like elements<br />
— presence of in-plane compressive or shear stresses in shell-like elements.<br />
11.1.2 Two alternative approaches may be used in analysing buckling problems:<br />
— analysis of isolated components of standard type, such as beams, plates and shells of simple shape<br />
— analysis of an entire structure (or of an entire, complex structural component).<br />
11.2 Buckling analysis of isolated components<br />
11.2.1 When a member or component that is a part of a larger structure is analysed separately a global analysis<br />
of the structure shall be first applied to establish:<br />
— the effective loading applied to the member/component by the adjoining structural parts<br />
— the boundary conditions for the structural member, in terms of translational and rotational stiffness<br />
components in all relevant directions.<br />
11.2.2 For simple members or components standard formulae or tables may be used to estimate elastic critical<br />
loads (P e ), critical stresses (σ e ) or critical strains (ε e ), and the corresponding elastic buckling mode shapes.<br />
Alternatively these quantities may be calculated using analytical or numerical methods. It shall always be<br />
checked that the buckling mode shape is consistent with the boundary conditions.<br />
11.2.3 An assessment shall be made of the shape and size of initial, geometrical imperfections that may<br />
influence the buckling behaviour of the member. Normally the most critical imperfection shape for a given<br />
buckling mode has a similar form to the buckling mode itself. However, any geometrical feature (including<br />
DET NORSKE VERITAS AS