09.10.2015 Views

OS-C501

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />

Sec.10 Component testing – Page 166<br />

— based on the individual degradation curves a lifetime analysis can be made<br />

— tests according to [3.3] shall be used to verify the predictions as far as possible.<br />

4.3.6 The lifetime analysis in [4.3.5] may be based on a combination of the measured (or predicted) static<br />

strength of the component and the worst degradation curve of the individual failure mechanisms. This tends to<br />

be a very conservative approach. A better approach is to determine the static failure loads for each failure<br />

mechanism and apply the degradation curves for each failure load.<br />

4.3.7 Obtaining degradation curves and or failure loads for individual failure mechanisms may require<br />

specially designed test pieces that will fail with the required failure mode.<br />

4.3.8 In some cases it may be possible that one failure mode that usually does not occur within practical testing<br />

times can be created by acceleration techniques, e.g. increasing the temperature. In such a case it may be<br />

possible to check two failure modes simultaneously under the accelerated conditions. Evidence for the<br />

acceleration conditions shall be provided.<br />

4.4 Example of multiple failure mechanisms<br />

Guidance note:<br />

Simplified example of multiple failure mechanisms:<br />

The purpose of this example is to explain the concepts used in [4]. The example is a simplified end connector of a<br />

pipe. The pipe is shown in Figure 10-1. It consists of a tube made of a composite laminate and a metal end fitting. The<br />

connection between the two is an adhesive joint.<br />

Laminate<br />

Figure 10-1<br />

Simplified schematic of a connector of a pipe<br />

Steel end fitting<br />

The adhesive joint was designed to be much stronger than the pipe itself. Its predicted failure was at a pressure “A”<br />

as shown in Figure 10-2. Short-term pressure tests confirmed fibre failure in the laminate at level B.<br />

A<br />

Test results<br />

Pressure<br />

MP<br />

C<br />

B<br />

Matrix or adhesive<br />

shear failure<br />

Fibre failure<br />

Max test time<br />

Time<br />

Figure 10-2<br />

Different times to failure for different failure mechanisms<br />

Design life<br />

Long term tests also showed fibre failure. The strength reduction with time was fairly small, as expected for fibre<br />

dominated properties.<br />

However, it is known from other tests that the strength of the adhesive degrades more rapidly with time than the fibre<br />

strength. The predicted reduction of strength is shown in curve A. Even at the end of the design life the pipe should<br />

still fail by fibre failure.<br />

The static strength A of the adhesive joint is, however, not well known and cannot be tested experimentally. If the<br />

strength is totally unknown it can be assumed that the measured static strength (fibre failure at level B) is also the<br />

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!