09.10.2015 Views

OS-C501

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Offshore Standard DNV-<strong>OS</strong>-<strong>C501</strong>, November 2013<br />

Sec.14 Calculation example: two pressure vessels – Page 204<br />

6.14 Summary evaluation<br />

6.14.1 Summarising as follows:<br />

— Impact resistance should be evaluated experimentally if the vessel may be exposed to impact loads.<br />

Experiments should show that possible impact loads will not cause fibre damage.<br />

— The water vessel passed all other requirements for service at 14.8 bar.<br />

— The matrix dominated ply strength is the design limiting factor for this vessel.<br />

— Component testing is recommended to establish the level of leakage instead of using the matrix cracking<br />

criterion. This approach would utilise the vessel much better.<br />

7 Linear analysis of vessel for water without liner<br />

7.1 General<br />

7.1.1 This method uses a linear analysis with non-degraded properties instead of a non-linear failure analysis<br />

in [6].<br />

7.1.2 In the present section we assume that leakage will occur if matrix cracking is present in at least one of<br />

the plies. Therefore, in the context of the water vessel we can apply the linear failure analysis with nondegraded<br />

material properties (Sec.9 [2.4]). In this case we have to modify the criterion for fibre failure (see<br />

Sec.9 [3.2])<br />

Guidance note:<br />

It is possible to apply a more realistic requirement for leakage, i.e. that leakage will not occur until matrix cracking is<br />

present in all the plies of the laminate. In this case, a (non-linear) progressive failure analysis must be performed as<br />

shown in [6].<br />

---e-n-d---of---G-u-i-d-a-n-c-e---n-o-t-e---<br />

7.1.3 Most parts of this analysis are identical to the one in [6]. Only the differences are shown here.<br />

7.2 Analysis procedure (ref. Sec.9 [2])<br />

7.2.1 The elastic properties without matrix cracking are needed here and were calculated in [4.1.4]. The values<br />

are different at the beginning and the end of the life of the component.<br />

Table 14-28 Elastic properties<br />

Property New component After 25 years in water<br />

E 1 fibre 23.7 GPa 21.3 GPa<br />

E 2 matrix 7.6 GPa 6.8 GPa<br />

ν 12 0.29 0.29<br />

G 12 linear 3.2 GPa 2.9 GPa<br />

7.2.2 The following results are obtained from the stress and laminate theory analysis (without using a load<br />

factor):<br />

Table 14-29 Results for vessel for water without liner<br />

General:<br />

After 25 years in water, no<br />

matrix cracks<br />

Pressure MPa 1.48<br />

Diameter mm 250<br />

Thickness mm 6<br />

Average axial stress MPa 15.8<br />

Average hoop stress MPa 31.6<br />

E axial GPa 11.02<br />

E hoop GPa 16.34<br />

±15 o plies:<br />

ε 1 % 0.108<br />

ε 2 % 0.168<br />

ε 12 % 0.035<br />

σ 1 MPa 27.0<br />

σ 2 MPa 13.9<br />

σ 12 MPa 1.01<br />

DET NORSKE VERITAS AS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!