Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Corporate governance report<br />
50<br />
the following companies besides ASSA ABLOY: Bonnier AB<br />
(publ) and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ).<br />
PwC submits the audit report for ASSA ABLOY AB, the<br />
Group and a large majority of the subsidiaries worldwide.<br />
The audit of ASSA ABLOY AB also includes the administration<br />
by the Board of Directors and the CEO.<br />
The company’s auditor attends all the meetings of the<br />
Audit Committee as well as the board meeting in February,<br />
at which he reports his observations and recommendations<br />
concerning the Group audit for the year.<br />
The external audit is carried out in accordance with<br />
good auditing practice in Sweden. The audit of the annual<br />
financial statements for legal entities outside Sweden is<br />
carried out in accordance with legal requirements and<br />
other applicable regulations in the country concerned<br />
and in accordance with good auditing practice as defined<br />
by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) for<br />
submitting audit reports for the legal entities. For information<br />
about the fees paid to auditors and other assignments<br />
carried out in the Group during the last three<br />
financial years, see Note 3 of this Report and Note 3 on<br />
page 63 of the Annual Report for 2006.<br />
Deviations from the Swedish Code of<br />
Corporate Governance<br />
ASSA ABLOY has chosen to deviate from the following<br />
clauses of the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance:<br />
Clause 2.1.2 (relevant parts)<br />
“The majority of the members of the nomination committee<br />
are not to be members of the board of directors. The chair of<br />
the board of directors or another board member is not to<br />
chair the nomination committee.”<br />
Explanation for the deviation: Prior to the 2008 Annual<br />
General Meeting, the Nomination Committee comprises<br />
four members, two of whom are board members. Half of<br />
the Committee’s members, but not a majority, are thus<br />
not board members. The departure from this clause of the<br />
Code is the result of, on the one hand, the wish to limit<br />
the number of members of the Committee in order not to<br />
jeopardize the effectiveness of the Committee’s nomination<br />
work and, on the other hand, the representation of<br />
the principal shareholders on the Committee. A majority<br />
of external members would have required five members,<br />
which was deemed to be too many. The Chairman of the<br />
Nomination Committee prior to the 2008 Annual General<br />
Meeting is Melker Schörling, who is also a member of<br />
ASSA ABLOY’s Board. The departure from this clause of<br />
the Code is justified by the fact that one of the largest<br />
shareholders in terms of votes naturally also leads the<br />
work of the Committee.<br />
Clause 3.2.4 (relevant parts)<br />
“The majority of the directors elected by the shareholders’<br />
meeting are to be independent of the company and its management.”<br />
Explanation for the deviation: This clause is not complied<br />
with on account of the so-called 12-year rule, which states<br />
that a director is not deemed to be independent if he has<br />
been a board member of the company for more than 12<br />
years. Four board members out of a total of eight board<br />
members are dependent on the company, as defined<br />
by the Code. For three of these, this dependence only<br />
arises on account of the 12-year rule. The Nomination<br />
Committee does not consider that in a company such<br />
as ASSA ABLOY dependence arises as a result of a board<br />
member working with and getting to know the company<br />
over a longer period.