Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>ARTICLES</strong><br />
“NO WAITING FOR GEORGE”:<br />
The Question of Support for the Black Watch<br />
assault on Verrières Ridge in Operation<br />
SPRING, Normandy, 25 July 1944<br />
David R. O’Keefe, MA, PhD<br />
The Canadian attack on Verrières Ridge during the morning<br />
of 25 July 1944 ranks as the second-costliest single-day<br />
engagement for the Canadian Army in the Second World War,<br />
exceeded only by the disaster at Dieppe. In less than 24 hours,<br />
a force of two infantry and two armoured divisions under the<br />
command of Lt-Gen Guy Simonds’s 2nd Canadian Corps<br />
suffered more than 1,500 casualties in Operation SPRING,<br />
leaving a legacy of recrimination and controversy. 1 Among the<br />
casualties, the loss of 300 of the 320 riflemen of the Black<br />
Watch remains a source of unending debate. One of many<br />
contentious issues is the question of tank and artillery support<br />
for the assault by the Black Watch on their objective in phase<br />
II, the village of Fontenay-le-Marmion. 2 Sixty-five years later,<br />
embittered survivors still state categorically that neither tank<br />
nor artillery support materialized during their mid-morning<br />
assault, and that the lack of support led directly to the failure<br />
of the four-hour attack, in which they suffered 94% casualties.<br />
Not surprisingly, veterans from both the 5th Field Artillery<br />
Regiment and the First Hussars refute these claims to varying<br />
degrees, and no historical account or military study has<br />
remedied the finger-pointing or provided much-needed<br />
understanding of the events of 25 July. For the most part, this<br />
is due to the failure to examine the situation faced by the<br />
Black Watch and their supporting arms within the overall<br />
context of Operation SPRING. This examination not only<br />
silences the lingering tempest in a teapot; it also transcends<br />
the inquiry to provide insight into the questions of leadership,<br />
decision-making, command and control, tank/infantry<br />
cooperation and the Clausewitzian “friction” and “fog of war”<br />
in this brutal chapter of Canadian military history. 3<br />
Designed by Simonds under the auspices of General Miles<br />
Dempsey’s Second British Army, SPRING reflected the<br />
Canadian Corps commander’s gunner training and his highly<br />
centralized command style. The plan was both complicated<br />
and complex, relying on strict timings and even stricter<br />
control for success. 4 Simonds’s plan, originally conceived on<br />
the morning of 20 July, envisioned a four-phase operation to<br />
© MR. DAVID R. O’KEEFE, ‘“NO WAITING FOR GEORGE”: THE QUESTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE BLACK WATCH ASSAULT<br />
ON VERRIÈRES RIDGE IN OPERATION SPRING, NORMANDY, 25 JULY 1944’, CANADIAN ARMY JOURNAL VOL. 16.2<br />
11