10.01.2017 Views

ARTICLES

caj-vol-16-2-comnplete-e

caj-vol-16-2-comnplete-e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ARTICLES</strong><br />

Meanwhile, Hutton, anxious of his fate, continued to pepper Minto with his own perspective<br />

on events, complaining of ever more offensive communications by Borden and guessing<br />

correctly that the government wanted to force him to resign or, failing that, demand his recall. 125<br />

“I suppose that Sir Wilfrid has seen you about myself,” he wrote, “I have been distant with<br />

Dr. Borden, and by the wild look of the gentleman I gather that he is in a suppressed state of<br />

indignation and whisky.” 126 At the same time, Hutton appealed to his patrons back home<br />

for support and prepared them to accept his version of the unfolding crisis. 127 To<br />

General Sir Evelyn Wood, Adjutant-General to the British Army, he explained that the Laurier<br />

government had “credited me with having forced their hands and aroused public opinion” and<br />

that, as a result, “I am viewed with jealousy and suspicion.” 128 “For this reason,” he continued,<br />

“I am now the victim of petty unpleasantness and discourtesies, which if they are seriously<br />

augmented may make it almost impossible for me to remain.” 129<br />

A week later Laurier again met with Minto, bringing with him the Governor General’s earlier<br />

memo, and pointing out that he and his colleagues believed Minto to have misunderstood the<br />

relative authority of the minister and general. 130 Minto, nonetheless, again warned that he<br />

would write a protest if Laurier demanded Hutton’s recall, and that he would see it placed on<br />

the official record. Laurier was unimpressed, hoping to keep matters confidential, but he would<br />

not be deterred. 131 Two days later, on 29 January, despite Minto’s threats, Laurier wrote his own<br />

note to Council, initiating Hutton’s recall. It described conditions within the Department of<br />

Militia as “very unsatisfactory by reason of the attitude of Major-General Hutton towards the<br />

Minister of Militia and the Government.” 132 Laurier requested that the Colonial Office expedite<br />

the general’s immediate recall. 133 The next day Minto told Laurier that given “the present<br />

anxious condition of the Empire,” he was considering declining to sign the Prime Minister’s<br />

order, “even though my refusal might be unconstitutional.” 134 Minto also told Laurier that he<br />

believed that the possibility existed that the Imperial government might refuse to consider the<br />

request for Hutton’s recall, in order to avoid removing a “most capable officer” at such a critical<br />

time. 135 Minto warned Laurier that his government was taking on a grave public and political<br />

risk in its course of action and suggested rearranging Cabinet. Laurier retorted that no minister<br />

would serve with Hutton. The meeting closed with the Prime Minister leaving his Orderin-Council<br />

with Minto. Hutton’s spirits sagged. He wrote to the Military Secretary at the War<br />

Office, Major-General Sir Coleridge Grove, this time not to plead for service in South Africa<br />

but rather to inquire about the possibility of ending his appointment in Canada. Grove replied<br />

that he was quite aware of “the extent to which politics permeate the military administration<br />

in Canada” but indicated that Hutton would have to resign if he wanted to come home. 136<br />

Meanwhile, Borden maintained the pressure on Laurier to see Hutton removed. On 3 February,<br />

in a rage, he sent Laurier a new set of accusations regarding a system of “secret orders” that he<br />

had discovered that morning in Hutton’s headquarters. It appeared that the GOC had directed<br />

his subordinates not to respond to any correspondence from the minister, or meet with him<br />

directly if possible, without first getting Hutton’s permission and thereafter reporting back<br />

anything that had transpired. 137 Such conduct, according to Borden, was “unprecedented in<br />

our history,” “unsupported by the rules and practice of the English War Office,” and was<br />

certainly opposed to the efficient working of the department. 138 In truth, however, the idea of<br />

a “secret orders” scandal was an invention of the minister for his own purposes. 139<br />

WWW.ARMY.FORCES.GC.CA/CAJ 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!