Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
After the O Group, Griffin made his way with the battalion to the crossroads in St. Martin while<br />
Harris returned to B Squadron and reported at 0844 hrs that they were ready to advance. 58<br />
Minutes before H‐hour, Megill found Griffin on the forward edge of St. Martin as the<br />
Black Watch began their advance down the road to the Factory area. 59 It was there that Griffin<br />
and Megill allegedly entered into a “heated discussion” between the “hard driving” Brigadier and<br />
the “headstrong” Major concerning the axis of the assault. But this historical canard lacks weight:<br />
when the dust settled, the plan remained unaltered. Salient, however, is the fact that Simonds,<br />
Foulkes and Megill refused to call off the attack or redirect the axis of advance into May-sur-Orne<br />
when they had the chance. Clearly, their collective silence confirmed their sanction of Griffin’s<br />
course of action. But at the very moment when Megill and Griffin were engaged in their tête-àtête,<br />
the ridge was being reinforced by the Germans in preparation for a counterattack that would<br />
have catastrophic consequences for the Black Watch and Simonds’s plan. 60<br />
Just before H‐hour, the Hussars received word from 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade<br />
that their tanks were not to advance as planned into May-sur-Orne until after the Calgary<br />
Highlanders had succeeded in capturing the town. 61 What prompted this decision is unknown,<br />
but it was most likely a reflection of the more experienced Brigade headquarters guiding<br />
Harris, who was fighting his first battle as Squadron commander. 62 More importantly, though,<br />
the evidence suggests that Griffin was unaware of this caveat, as the message originated at<br />
approximately the same time as the Black Watch were deploying in the fields east of the<br />
Factory. 63 There is no record that Harris, or anyone else, attempted to contact Griffin, although<br />
the possibility cannot be ruled out as Harris’s communications were curtailed when a mortar<br />
shell ripped the aerial from his tank while it was still in the orchard area. 64<br />
Even if the attempt had been made early in the assault, radio contact with the forward<br />
companies of the Black Watch and Griffin was lost minutes into the attack, leaving the Black<br />
Watch cut off from radio communication. 65 Most likely, Harris assumed that Griffin had<br />
received word, and there seemed to be reason to at least hope that, despite the young Major’s<br />
order, high command had indeed seen the light and called off the attack. Either way, Harris<br />
and B Squadron remained in a holding pattern in St. Martin as H-hour arrived and the Black<br />
Watch went in. 66<br />
The news of the attack caught Harris “off guard,” according to Black Watch Support Company<br />
commander Capt R.E. Bennett, whose job it was to guard the tank harbour and follow<br />
B Squadron into Fontenay. 67 In Bennett’s estimation, Harris’s tanks “suddenly…started to<br />
move” between “1030 and 1130” which if correct, would be a full 1 to 2 hours behind the Black<br />
Watch. 68 As if to underscore the general confusion of the morning, Bennett managed to catch<br />
up with Harris as his tank rolled out of the orchard in St. Martin and asked him “if the show<br />
was still on?” Harris confirmed that it was, and proceeded to furnish Bennett with the location<br />
of the Black Watch rifle companies, which seemed plausible to Bennett at the time. 69<br />
Harris later claimed that the “sunken and narrow roads” south of St. Martin delayed his advance<br />
by no more than five minutes and that he was never out of visual contact with the infantry. 70<br />
The existing evidence does not support Bennett’s claim that the tanks were “1–2 hours” late,<br />
but neither does it support Harris’s claim that he was “five minutes” late. 71 In fact, the message<br />
20 THE CANADIAN ARMY JOURNAL VOLUME 16.2 2016