10.01.2017 Views

ARTICLES

caj-vol-16-2-comnplete-e

caj-vol-16-2-comnplete-e

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Source: Library and Archives Canada<br />

Troops of the Royal Canadian Regiment crossing Paardeberg Drift, February 1900<br />

had control of its procurement and finances, he would have discovered the truth. Further,<br />

Strathcona’s plan would allow Hutton to assume the functions of the civilian branch of the<br />

militia department, even if only temporarily and for a specific purpose. Neither politician could<br />

accept this new role for the GOC. 117 Their solution lay in “exploiting the tension that already<br />

existed.” 118 That is, Laurier and Borden collaborated at this point to see Hutton removed, which<br />

to some extent explains the further hardening of attitudes of both men from mid-January. 119<br />

Laurier moved quickly to pressure Strathcona to reverse his decision to place Hutton, outside<br />

of normal departmental chains, in charge of overseeing his force. He disingenuously assured<br />

Strathcona there had been no “politics” in the raising of either contingent thus far. 120 Strathcona<br />

conceded the issue to Laurier. 121<br />

In the wake of such controversies, Hutton went to Halifax to oversee the departure of the<br />

second Canadian contingent, leaving Minto to deal with Laurier and the ever-deepening rift<br />

between the GOC and his political masters. 122 Minto’s plan to deal with the government’s clear<br />

desire to remove Hutton was to delay and to consult London. A subsequent series of interviews<br />

between Minto and Laurier were heated. Laurier complained that Hutton was meddlesome<br />

and insubordinate. Minto defended his old friend to the hilt, telling the Prime Minister that<br />

political interference in the Militia Department prevented Hutton from doing “good work,”<br />

and that, if compelled to ask London for his removal, he would place his own official opinion<br />

on the matter before the Colonial Secretary. 123 Such an action, Laurier retorted, might compel<br />

his government to resign. Minto wrote to Chamberlain that in such circumstances he would<br />

accept its resignation. After a further interview between the two men on 20 January, Minto<br />

wrote a memo protesting against both ongoing political interference in military affairs and<br />

Borden’s discourtesies towards Hutton. This memo, according to Minto, fell accidentally into<br />

Cabinet hands rather than into the possession of a Cabinet committee as he had intended. 124<br />

42 THE CANADIAN ARMY JOURNAL VOLUME 16.2 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!