- Page 2:
AFRICA AGRICULTURE STATUS REPORT 20
- Page 5 and 6:
FOREWORD Over the last decade, mill
- Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Africa Agricul
- Page 9 and 10:
ACRONYMS Africa Lead AAS AASR AATIF
- Page 11 and 12:
FMARD FSN FTF GACSA GAFSP GAIN GART
- Page 13 and 14:
SAKSS SBCC SCARDA SCM SDG SDI SI SM
- Page 15 and 16:
Introduction For decades, observers
- Page 17 and 18:
and changing food diets associated
- Page 19 and 20:
Table 1.2: Population growth of sel
- Page 21 and 22:
Figure 1.4: Changes in annual agric
- Page 23 and 24:
already occurring (Headey & Jayne,
- Page 25 and 26:
lease of customary land without the
- Page 27 and 28:
Hence, the pattern of trade illustr
- Page 29 and 30:
Table 1.4: Changes in farm structur
- Page 31 and 32:
of the pathway to food and nutritio
- Page 33 and 34:
Jayne, T. S., Chamberlin, J., Traub
- Page 35 and 36: KEY MESSAGES ONE CAADP is an unpara
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 2.1.Overview of the CAADP Im
- Page 39 and 40: level. The success of ReSAKSS is be
- Page 41 and 42: agricultural potential, alternative
- Page 43 and 44: Table 2.1: Trends in selected CAADP
- Page 45 and 46: poverty fell faster during this per
- Page 47 and 48: expenditure (research, extension, i
- Page 49 and 50: Table 2.4. Average annual change in
- Page 51 and 52: captures the individual pathways of
- Page 53 and 54: MA also has to be underpinned by lo
- Page 55 and 56: References African Union. (2014). M
- Page 57 and 58: Meenakshi, J.V., Johnson, N.L., Man
- Page 59 and 60: KEY MESSAGES ONE TWO THREE FOUR Afr
- Page 61 and 62: GDP declined by 1.4 percent in 2009
- Page 63 and 64: from political violence, terrorism,
- Page 65 and 66: interpretation is implied, this obs
- Page 67 and 68: Differences in the African pattern
- Page 69 and 70: Table 3.5: Trends in types of emplo
- Page 71 and 72: that would likely affect the contri
- Page 73 and 74: c. Concentration of farm structure
- Page 75 and 76: a. Invest in education to upgrade t
- Page 77 and 78: These could include policy measures
- Page 79 and 80: References African Center for Econo
- Page 81 and 82: Giller, K. E., Rowe, E. C., de Ridd
- Page 83 and 84: Ndung’u, N. S. (2016). Viewpoint:
- Page 85: World Bank. (2015). World developme
- Page 89 and 90: BOX 4.1: Components of Sustainable
- Page 91 and 92: of the world. These authors also re
- Page 93 and 94: Further, Locatelli et al. (2008) ha
- Page 95 and 96: Climate and Weather Variability The
- Page 97 and 98: Resilience of livelihoods is determ
- Page 99 and 100: While acknowledging successes of SI
- Page 101 and 102: Entry Points For Sustainable Intens
- Page 103 and 104: BOX 4.4: The CSA Compendium: A scie
- Page 105 and 106: Successful interventions include fo
- Page 107 and 108: Open data combined with agricultura
- Page 109 and 110: According to Tshibaka (2014), evide
- Page 111 and 112: References Abdulai, A., & Delgado,
- Page 113 and 114: Enfors, E. (2013). Social-ecologica
- Page 115 and 116: Lipper, L., Thornton, P., Campbell,
- Page 117 and 118: Toulmin, C., Leonard, R., Brock, K.
- Page 119 and 120: KEY MESSAGES ONE In SSA, sustainabl
- Page 121 and 122: Figure 5.1: Poverty traps framework
- Page 123 and 124: Cereal Yield/Kilogram Per Hectare F
- Page 125 and 126: Table 5.2: Correlation between fact
- Page 127 and 128: Table 5.3: Farmer use of improved i
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 5.9: Agricultural research s
- Page 131 and 132: association is found for cereal out
- Page 133 and 134: AGRA’s Experience The observation
- Page 135 and 136: Increase access to affordable crop
- Page 137 and 138:
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2014
- Page 139 and 140:
KEY MESSAGES ONE Smallholder farmer
- Page 141 and 142:
transformation in Africa. The achie
- Page 143 and 144:
from agribusiness actors to smallho
- Page 145 and 146:
season, maize prices could be 270 p
- Page 147 and 148:
critical challenges and the solutio
- Page 149 and 150:
Limited access and high cost of acc
- Page 151 and 152:
of onion production in northern Gha
- Page 153 and 154:
Conclusions This chapter presents t
- Page 155 and 156:
Collins, D., Morduch, ,. J., Ruther
- Page 157 and 158:
Minot, N. (2014). Food price volati
- Page 159 and 160:
Weatherspoon, D. D., & Reardon, T.
- Page 161 and 162:
KEY MESSAGES ONE Access to finance
- Page 163 and 164:
esources into agriculture. This in
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 7.1: Indicative investments t
- Page 167 and 168:
technical knowledge about products.
- Page 169 and 170:
continue to experience inadequate a
- Page 171 and 172:
Box 7.1: GAFSP: Country Examples Rw
- Page 173 and 174:
Private Equity Association, total p
- Page 175 and 176:
drawing down assets, and 25 percent
- Page 177 and 178:
equires: recognition of the critica
- Page 179 and 180:
Policy Recommendations This review
- Page 181 and 182:
Meyer, R. L. (2015, March). Financi
- Page 183 and 184:
KEY MESSAGES ONE The African contin
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 8.1: Mobile phone based serv
- Page 187 and 188:
high input costs, and a disconnecte
- Page 189 and 190:
available through less high-tech de
- Page 191 and 192:
Figure 8.4: Kenya leads the pack fo
- Page 193 and 194:
years and higher quality seeds are
- Page 195 and 196:
CASE STUDY FieldLook South Sudan in
- Page 197 and 198:
Rationale behind rapid adoption •
- Page 199 and 200:
CASE STUDY Eastern Africa Farmer Fe
- Page 201 and 202:
many others have none or have strin
- Page 203 and 204:
the strategic adoption of ICT with
- Page 205 and 206:
To address constraints to improving
- Page 207 and 208:
References Accenture. (2015). Digit
- Page 209 and 210:
Gustafson, S. (27.1.2016). The Digi
- Page 211 and 212:
Wolfenson K. D. (2013). Coping with
- Page 213 and 214:
KEY MESSAGES ONE A guided evolution
- Page 215 and 216:
een registered over the last decade
- Page 217 and 218:
the AIS paradigm at policy and prog
- Page 219 and 220:
Box 9.2: Rwanda - A Phoenix Rising
- Page 221 and 222:
other supportive partners (tertiary
- Page 223 and 224:
Table 9.2: SSA AR4D funding through
- Page 225 and 226:
(e.g., NARIs, universities, NGOs, F
- Page 227 and 228:
Table 9.3: Number of extension agen
- Page 229 and 230:
the whole farm whereas the field sc
- Page 231 and 232:
approach, organizational or system
- Page 233 and 234:
CASE STUDY Regional Universities Fo
- Page 235 and 236:
CASE STUDY African Network for Agri
- Page 237 and 238:
CASE STUDY FAO—Tropical Agricultu
- Page 239 and 240:
Bizimana, C. (2014). Rwanda’s Ach
- Page 241 and 242:
Rwanda. Retrieved from http://www.m
- Page 243 and 244:
World Bank. (2007). Project Apprais
- Page 245 and 246:
KEY MESSAGES ONE The poverty rate a
- Page 247 and 248:
Table 10.1: Number of undernourishe
- Page 249 and 250:
Figure 10.6: Stunting in children u
- Page 251 and 252:
Why single out nutrition matters? A
- Page 253 and 254:
BOX 10.1: The 7 Malabo Declaration
- Page 255 and 256:
Reducing post-harvest losses FAO es
- Page 257 and 258:
BOX 10.4: Growing trend towards a m
- Page 259 and 260:
References African Union. (2015). T
- Page 261 and 262:
Schmidt, R. H., & Rodrick, G. E. (2
- Page 263 and 264:
“Africa is simply tired of being
- Page 265 and 266:
2025, tripling intra-African trade,
- Page 267 and 268:
towards agricultural transformation
- Page 269 and 270:
While agricultural research generat
- Page 271 and 272:
258 AFRICA AGRICULTURE STATUS REPOR
- Page 273 and 274:
Technical Notes The following conve
- Page 275 and 276:
Madagascar 72.6 72.3 72.1 71.8 71.2
- Page 277 and 278:
Madagascar 2.81 -15.28 6.54 2.19 1.
- Page 279 and 280:
Madagascar 351.1 337.2 332.9 323.7
- Page 281 and 282:
Madagascar 2,020 1,967 2,202 2,354
- Page 283 and 284:
Madagascar 86.0 84.2 87.3 91.8 103.
- Page 285 and 286:
Mali .. .. 52.0 15.7 17.5 31.1 22.5
- Page 287 and 288:
Madagascar -0.0053 -0.0075 0.0073 -
- Page 289 and 290:
Malawi 401.9 405.1 437.2 438.9 511.
- Page 291 and 292:
Madagascar 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6
- Page 293 and 294:
Madagascar 0.9 1.0 1.6 1.9 2.8 5.6
- Page 295 and 296:
Liberia .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
- Page 297:
Liberia 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.5