Special Rate Variation Community Engagement Report - Shoalhaven City Council

Recommendations

Info

The Random Community Phone Survey undertaken by IRIS also clearly showed that at least 60% of residents (after one week of the engagement process) were aware of the proposal and that most had become aware through either the local radio or local media. 6.2.9 Community Consultative Bodies Council has a network of 24 Community Consultative Bodies which it regularly uses to communicate important information such as its financial position etc. Following the Financial Sustainability Report above and the Fit for the Future announcement, Council met with the executives of all the CCB’s in April 2015 and provided them with a presentation of the financial position and the proposed 20% rate rise over the next 2 years (As proposed at that time based on 2 x 7.5% rate increases above 2.5% rate peg). The CCB’s are provided with all Council business papers and minutes and are kept abreast of all discussions Council is having in relation to its financial situation. They are kept up to date with regular email contact from various staff members and a CCB Newsletter that is sent out monthly. CCB’s also have a direct contact with a CCB Liaison who has been in the role since June 2016. Every year CCB’s have the option to attend CCB Executive Meetings. These meetings involve presentations from all Councillors Group Directors and are also attended by current Councillors. Each year CCB’s also have a bus tour visit their village. These bus tours bring Councillors, Group Directors and Section Manager to each region where the CCB’s can identify their proprieties and concerns face-to-face with Directors and/or Councillors. In Nov 2016 another CCB Executive meeting was held to provide them with a direct presentation on Council’s current financial position and the new proposal (2 x 13.5% rate increases above a 1.5% and a 2.5% rate peg). Another CCB Executive meeting was held with Council’s Group Directors in January 2017, at the request of CCB’s to discuss the proposal and answer questions from the executive members of Council’s CCB’s.20 members attended this meeting along with Councillors. At this time Council’s CCBs were provided with a presentation at the CCB Executive meeting and access to the information. This continued when the State Government introduced the Fit for the Future requirements. Council updated its information in line with these requirements and again made this information available to the community. The Fit for the Future submission clearly outlined the need for two x 7.5% above rate peg increases. 36
Image 11-CCB Newsletter-November 2016 Copies of the presentations given to CCBs at both the Executive Meeting and SRV Meeting with Directors are provided as Appendix 9 and 10. 37
Page 2 and 3: Contents 1 Introduction ...........
Page 4 and 5: Appendix 9 - CCB Executive Meeting
Page 6 and 7: period 2017/18 and 2018/19. There w
Page 8 and 9: 3 Identifying Community Needs and E
Page 10 and 11: Extensive promotion of the workshop
Page 12 and 13: Media Release ‐15 November 2012 C
Page 14 and 15: Graph 1- Percentage of respondent
Page 16 and 17: Graph 6-Rating v Criticality 4.2 Co
Page 18 and 19: 5 Community Engagement- Fit for the
Page 20 and 21: Image 2- Merger proposal brochure 5
Page 22 and 23: Image 4- “On the Move”-July Edi
Page 24 and 25: Image 6-Neighbourhood News-October
Page 26 and 27: the merger proposal. A number cited
Page 28 and 29: copies of information with them and
Page 30 and 31: The site was updated throughout the
Page 32 and 33: The EHQ page “Your Rates, Everybo
Page 34 and 35: 25 th October 2016 Ordinary Meeting
Page 38 and 39: 7 Community Feedback 7.1 Random Tel
Page 40 and 41: charges, if it makes Shoalhaven Cit
Page 42 and 43: 7.1.7 Services to be reduced Respon
Page 44 and 45: 2 had a support level of 2 out of 1
Page 46 and 47: Appendix 1 ‐Media Articles and Co
Page 48 and 49: 8 February 2016 ‐ South Coast Reg
Page 50 and 51: 13 October ‐ Milton Ulladulla Tim
Page 52 and 53: Newly elected Greens councillor Nin
Page 54 and 55: 2 February - 2ST - Rate rise decisi
Page 56 and 57: 15 November 2016 56
Page 58 and 59: 58
Page 60 and 61: 60
Page 62 and 63: 1 February 2017, 19:56 62
Page 64 and 65: 64
Page 66 and 67: 1 February 2017 2 February 2017 66
Page 68 and 69: Appendix 3 - Summary of Submissions
Page 70 and 71: I volunteer for St. Vincent de Paul
Page 72 and 73: 5% every year for 7 years (plus rat
Page 74 and 75: Vincentia Residents and Rate Payers
Page 76 and 77: establish a Citizen’s Jury as rat
Page 78 and 79: more and more why Trump won the U.S
Page 80 and 81: Council needs to forward plan and t
Page 82 and 83: small trailer loads and a boot of t
Page 84 and 85: ates then services and facilities m
Page 86 and 87:
‐ I do not want to see any loss o
Page 88 and 89:
In my view, Shoalhaven City Council
Page 90 and 91:
esulting in a significant shortfall
Page 92 and 93:
to expect that ratepayers can just
Page 94 and 95:
On an interesting point, the Common
Page 96 and 97:
You need to concentrate on the prio
Page 98 and 99:
I would also think that properties
Page 100 and 101:
Appendix 4 ‐Shoalhaven Survey - I
Page 102 and 103:
Better than I need Really good Good
Page 104 and 105:
11. Based on the image shown below,
Page 106 and 107:
14. Do you agree that Council shoul
Page 108 and 109:
Path in "fair" condition Path in "g
Page 110 and 111:
Strongly agree Agree Can’t say Di
Page 112 and 113:
I n s i g h t f o r B u s i n e s s
Page 114 and 115:
Tables and figures Table 1. Sample
Page 116 and 117:
Key Recommendations The research ha
Page 118 and 119:
Background The State Government’s
Page 120 and 121:
other services. In addition to its
Page 122 and 123:
Introduction At the Shoalhaven City
Page 124 and 125:
Table 1. Sample profile Gender % n
Page 126 and 127:
2.3 Community Strategy Plan awarene
Page 128 and 129:
2.4 Perceptions towards Council’s
Page 130 and 131:
The regression model explained 28%
Page 132 and 133:
Table 4. Recommended ways to raise
Page 134 and 135:
2.5 Council’s new rates proposal
Page 136 and 137:
Figure 7. Support levels - rate-pay
Page 138 and 139:
A second set of motivations include
Page 140 and 141:
The regression model revealed inter
Page 142 and 143:
2.5.6 Services to be reduced / elim
Page 144 and 145:
Respondents could not suggest any p
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 12. Usefulness of Council se
Page 148 and 149:
eserves, which residents also find
Page 150 and 151:
2.8 Residents’ view of Council’
Page 152 and 153:
3.1 Factor Analysis Before building
Page 154 and 155:
3.2 Community management path model
Page 156 and 157:
Figure 15. Path model - Effect size
Page 158 and 159:
3.2.2 Management of Shoalhaven’s
Page 160 and 161:
Appendix A: Improvement areas in th
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Showground neglected needs more mai
Page 174 and 175:
Appendix B: Improvement areas in th
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Appendix C: Sample Age/Sex Weightin
Page 186 and 187:
Hi All, Enclosed is the Your Rates,
Page 188 and 189:
Why do we need a rates rise ? The f
Page 190 and 191:
Services and facilities may need to
Page 192 and 193:
area that the development is locate
Page 194 and 195:
The following table demonstrates ho
Page 196 and 197:
4. How much will my rates increase?
Page 198 and 199:
13. What about all the new developm
Page 200 and 201:
Council has some important decision
Page 202 and 203:
Shoalhaven City Council CSP Review
Page 204 and 205:
CSP Review Project Shoalhaven City
Page 206 and 207:
Media Coverage including Social Med
Page 208 and 209:
Berry - Outdoor stall Bendalong - O
Page 210 and 211:
good 21 to 25 Demographic questions
Page 212 and 213:
CSP Review Webpage Over the past 3
Page 214 and 215:
Feedback Analysis Main issues raise
Page 216 and 217:
Prosperous Community Natural Enviro
Page 218 and 219:
Question What do you see as the imp
Page 220 and 221:
What could be done about it in the
Page 222 and 223:
discount on your rates when you pay
Page 224 and 225:
Community and Stakeholder Response
Page 226 and 227:
Natural Environment Effective Gover
Page 228 and 229:
Citizens and stakeholders represent
Page 230 and 231:
Linked to the Community Strategic P
Page 232 and 233:
Appendix B: Postcards General postc
Page 234 and 235:
4. Further to the above, please pro
Page 236 and 237:
Car parks 3. Please rank the f
Page 238 and 239:
Good enough Not good enough 9. Ba
Page 240 and 241:
12. Based on the image shown below,
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
45
Page 248 and 249:
47
Page 250 and 251:
49
Page 252 and 253:
51
Page 254 and 255:
53
Page 256 and 257:
Appendix H: Infrastructure survey -
Page 258 and 259:
70% % of Respondents 'Strongly Agre
Page 260 and 261:
Shoalhaven City Council CSP Review
Page 262 and 263:
CSP Review Project Shoalhaven City
Page 264 and 265:
Community Feedback Email, Voicemail
Page 266 and 267:
a wide ranging engagement strategy
Page 268 and 269:
advantages and natural qualities" D
Page 270 and 271:
D13/859 80 K Other Fails to actuall
Page 272 and 273:
Governance Handbook". D13/840 94 D1
Page 274 and 275:
D13/859 80 D13/859 80 D13/859 80 F
Page 276 and 277:
D13/867 47 AD Strategi es 3.08 shou
Page 278 and 279:
D13/842 87 B Structur e Document la
Page 280 and 281:
D13/842 97 F Structur e Measures in
Page 282 and 283:
D13/857 18 M Objecti ves Many of th
Page 284 and 285:
D13/653 61 D13/842 87 B H Other Oth
Page 286 and 287:
D13/857 18 J Other The Plan refers
Page 288 and 289:
D13/857 27 B Other On engagement, i
Page 290 and 291:
D13/859 80 C Other Accompanying doc
Page 292 and 293:
D13/867 47 N Other Monitoring the C
Page 294 and 295:
D13/683 53 A Strategi es Document v
Page 296 and 297:
D13/801 82 B Strategi es Relevance
Page 298 and 299:
D13/842 87 D13/842 87 L M Strategi
Page 300 and 301:
D13/846 60 A Strategi es There are
Page 302 and 303:
D13/857 18 D13/857 18 G H Strategi
Page 304 and 305:
D13/859 80 D13/867 47 I AE Strategi
Page 306 and 307:
CSP Strategies see also response on
Page 308 and 309:
the Plan. KRAs should be restored t
Page 310 and 311:
D13/867 47 F Structur e No measure
Page 312 and 313:
Citizens and stakeholders represent
Page 314 and 315:
Linked to the Community Strategic P
Page 316 and 317:
Appendix 9 - CCB Executive Meeting
Page 318 and 319:
IPART REPORT • Premier, Mike Bair
Page 320 and 321:
IPART REPORT 4
Page 322 and 323:
IPART REPORT • Consulted with all
Page 324 and 325:
Upper House Inquiry • • http://
Page 326 and 327:
Financial Performance 2015/16 • 1
Page 328 and 329:
Appendix 10 - CCB Executive Meeting
Page 331:
CCB Letter Independent review forwa
Page 335:
CCB Letter Efficiency - outlined on
Page 339:
IPART Review of Rating System IPART
Page 343:
TCorp • The Council has a mainten
Page 347:
Information to Incoming 2012 Counci
Page 353:
Current proposal • 2 x 11.5% rate
Page 359:
• Building and Infrastructure Ass
Page 363:
Special rates fund Maintenance - pr
Page 367:
• The average score (4.9 out of 1
Page 377:
Other Revenue Measures • Fees and
Page 381:
Council Municipality of Hunters Hil
Page 397:
Asset remaining and useful life •
Page 401:
Example of Building Ison Park - Spo
Page 405:
Asset Valuation $45,000,000 3% Asse
Page 409:
Road funding required • 1400kms o
Page 413:
Condition of Roads Condition Distri
Page 498 and 499:
Appendix 12 - Guestbook posts
Page 500 and 501:
educe costs. How can council have t
Page 502 and 503:
a feel for community opinion. Whils
Page 504 and 505:
attended the Lake Wollumboola Flood
Page 506 and 507:
PRELIMINARY THOUGHTS OF SHOALHAVEN
Page 508 and 509:
a strategy designed to raise rates
show all

Special Rate Variation Community Engagement Report - Shoalhaven City Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?