15.03.2017 Views

Special Rate Variation Community Engagement Report - Shoalhaven City Council

Shoalhaven City Council lodged a formal application to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) for a Special Rate Variation.

Shoalhaven City Council lodged a formal application to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) for a Special Rate Variation.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

You need to concentrate on the priority issues ‐ roads, rubbish, upkeep of public<br />

assets. Any other fancy notions can then be dealt with IF there are funds left over.<br />

The council needs to stop wasting money that they don’t have.<br />

55Lipscomb<br />

e, Dawn<br />

56Symons,<br />

Chris<br />

D16/3692<br />

52<br />

D16/3670<br />

96<br />

No rate rise. Not supportive as believes that the rise is a result of the purchase of<br />

land in Huskisson. <strong>Council</strong> needs to live within its means, I cannot afford an increase<br />

in rates<br />

How could anyone object to a rate increase when they know what you and your<br />

mob are doing and have planned!<br />

Comment noted and included in<br />

statistics<br />

Comment noted and included in<br />

statistics<br />

Keep up the very good work<br />

57Frew,<br />

Derek<br />

D16/3664<br />

47<br />

I am a ratepayer within the <strong>Shoalhaven</strong> and I object to any rate rise beyond the<br />

IPART pegged rate. The reasons for my objection are below:<br />

A. Under a previous council a “once only” rate increase was added in recent years.<br />

At the time this rate rise was quoted as being necessary to retain our standards. It<br />

was also part of the reason the <strong>Shoalhaven</strong> <strong>Council</strong> was considered “fit for business”<br />

and not subjected to forced amalgamation under the NSW government proposals.<br />

<strong>Rate</strong>payers in the <strong>Shoalhaven</strong> reluctantly accepted the arguments provided for this<br />

“One off” rate increase above the pegged rate.<br />

Comments are noted. <strong>Council</strong><br />

understands the potential impact of<br />

those on fixed incomes. <strong>Council</strong> has<br />

in place a hardship policy to assist<br />

those that have difficulty paying<br />

rates.<br />

B. I am reliant upon a government pension as my sole source of income. This<br />

pension, currently, is sufficient to enable me to live a comfortable life. My pension,<br />

unlike many others, will be taxed as income for my entire life. This means I pay<br />

approximately 28% of my pension in Tax, and will do so until I die. My pension is<br />

indexed twice annually. The indexation that is applied is either CPI or the Average<br />

Quarterly Wage Index. Over the past years this indexation has been in the order of<br />

2%. In this year alone my electricity bill has increased by 12%, gas by about 8% and<br />

all other utilities and services by similar amounts. These items are not considered in<br />

CPI and therefore cost me in real terms against my pension. Your proposed rate<br />

increases do exactly the same, and this is the reason the IPART pegging system was<br />

introduced ‐ to prevent non‐CPI type increases from detracting from peoples<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!