Special Rate Variation Community Engagement Report - Shoalhaven City Council

Recommendations

Info

Asset remaining and useful life • The useful life is expressed as the period of time over which the assets are expected to be consumed • Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset over its useful life • Fair value for infrastructure assets is generally determined be depreciated replacement cost
Page 2 and 3:
Contents 1 Introduction ...........
Page 4 and 5:
Appendix 9 - CCB Executive Meeting
Page 6 and 7:
period 2017/18 and 2018/19. There w
Page 8 and 9:
3 Identifying Community Needs and E
Page 10 and 11:
Extensive promotion of the workshop
Page 12 and 13:
Media Release ‐15 November 2012 C
Page 14 and 15:
Graph 1- Percentage of respondent
Page 16 and 17:
Graph 6-Rating v Criticality 4.2 Co
Page 18 and 19:
5 Community Engagement- Fit for the
Page 20 and 21:
Image 2- Merger proposal brochure 5
Page 22 and 23:
Image 4- “On the Move”-July Edi
Page 24 and 25:
Image 6-Neighbourhood News-October
Page 26 and 27:
the merger proposal. A number cited
Page 28 and 29:
copies of information with them and
Page 30 and 31:
The site was updated throughout the
Page 32 and 33:
The EHQ page “Your Rates, Everybo
Page 34 and 35:
25 th October 2016 Ordinary Meeting
Page 36 and 37:
The Random Community Phone Survey u
Page 38 and 39:
7 Community Feedback 7.1 Random Tel
Page 40 and 41:
charges, if it makes Shoalhaven Cit
Page 42 and 43:
7.1.7 Services to be reduced Respon
Page 44 and 45:
2 had a support level of 2 out of 1
Page 46 and 47:
Appendix 1 ‐Media Articles and Co
Page 48 and 49:
8 February 2016 ‐ South Coast Reg
Page 50 and 51:
13 October ‐ Milton Ulladulla Tim
Page 52 and 53:
Newly elected Greens councillor Nin
Page 54 and 55:
2 February - 2ST - Rate rise decisi
Page 56 and 57:
15 November 2016 56
Page 58 and 59:
58
Page 60 and 61:
60
Page 62 and 63:
1 February 2017, 19:56 62
Page 64 and 65:
64
Page 66 and 67:
1 February 2017 2 February 2017 66
Page 68 and 69:
Appendix 3 - Summary of Submissions
Page 70 and 71:
I volunteer for St. Vincent de Paul
Page 72 and 73:
5% every year for 7 years (plus rat
Page 74 and 75:
Vincentia Residents and Rate Payers
Page 76 and 77:
establish a Citizen’s Jury as rat
Page 78 and 79:
more and more why Trump won the U.S
Page 80 and 81:
Council needs to forward plan and t
Page 82 and 83:
small trailer loads and a boot of t
Page 84 and 85:
ates then services and facilities m
Page 86 and 87:
‐ I do not want to see any loss o
Page 88 and 89:
In my view, Shoalhaven City Council
Page 90 and 91:
esulting in a significant shortfall
Page 92 and 93:
to expect that ratepayers can just
Page 94 and 95:
On an interesting point, the Common
Page 96 and 97:
You need to concentrate on the prio
Page 98 and 99:
I would also think that properties
Page 100 and 101:
Appendix 4 ‐Shoalhaven Survey - I
Page 102 and 103:
Better than I need Really good Good
Page 104 and 105:
11. Based on the image shown below,
Page 106 and 107:
14. Do you agree that Council shoul
Page 108 and 109:
Path in "fair" condition Path in "g
Page 110 and 111:
Strongly agree Agree Can’t say Di
Page 112 and 113:
I n s i g h t f o r B u s i n e s s
Page 114 and 115:
Tables and figures Table 1. Sample
Page 116 and 117:
Key Recommendations The research ha
Page 118 and 119:
Background The State Government’s
Page 120 and 121:
other services. In addition to its
Page 122 and 123:
Introduction At the Shoalhaven City
Page 124 and 125:
Table 1. Sample profile Gender % n
Page 126 and 127:
2.3 Community Strategy Plan awarene
Page 128 and 129:
2.4 Perceptions towards Council’s
Page 130 and 131:
The regression model explained 28%
Page 132 and 133:
Table 4. Recommended ways to raise
Page 134 and 135:
2.5 Council’s new rates proposal
Page 136 and 137:
Figure 7. Support levels - rate-pay
Page 138 and 139:
A second set of motivations include
Page 140 and 141:
The regression model revealed inter
Page 142 and 143:
2.5.6 Services to be reduced / elim
Page 144 and 145:
Respondents could not suggest any p
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 12. Usefulness of Council se
Page 148 and 149:
eserves, which residents also find
Page 150 and 151:
2.8 Residents’ view of Council’
Page 152 and 153:
3.1 Factor Analysis Before building
Page 154 and 155:
3.2 Community management path model
Page 156 and 157:
Figure 15. Path model - Effect size
Page 158 and 159:
3.2.2 Management of Shoalhaven’s
Page 160 and 161:
Appendix A: Improvement areas in th
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Showground neglected needs more mai
Page 174 and 175:
Appendix B: Improvement areas in th
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Appendix C: Sample Age/Sex Weightin
Page 186 and 187:
Hi All, Enclosed is the Your Rates,
Page 188 and 189:
Why do we need a rates rise ? The f
Page 190 and 191:
Services and facilities may need to
Page 192 and 193:
area that the development is locate
Page 194 and 195:
The following table demonstrates ho
Page 196 and 197:
4. How much will my rates increase?
Page 198 and 199:
13. What about all the new developm
Page 200 and 201:
Council has some important decision
Page 202 and 203:
Shoalhaven City Council CSP Review
Page 204 and 205:
CSP Review Project Shoalhaven City
Page 206 and 207:
Media Coverage including Social Med
Page 208 and 209:
Berry - Outdoor stall Bendalong - O
Page 210 and 211:
good 21 to 25 Demographic questions
Page 212 and 213:
CSP Review Webpage Over the past 3
Page 214 and 215:
Feedback Analysis Main issues raise
Page 216 and 217:
Prosperous Community Natural Enviro
Page 218 and 219:
Question What do you see as the imp
Page 220 and 221:
What could be done about it in the
Page 222 and 223:
discount on your rates when you pay
Page 224 and 225:
Community and Stakeholder Response
Page 226 and 227:
Natural Environment Effective Gover
Page 228 and 229:
Citizens and stakeholders represent
Page 230 and 231:
Linked to the Community Strategic P
Page 232 and 233:
Appendix B: Postcards General postc
Page 234 and 235:
4. Further to the above, please pro
Page 236 and 237:
Car parks 3. Please rank the f
Page 238 and 239:
Good enough Not good enough 9. Ba
Page 240 and 241:
12. Based on the image shown below,
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
45
Page 248 and 249:
47
Page 250 and 251:
49
Page 252 and 253:
51
Page 254 and 255:
53
Page 256 and 257:
Appendix H: Infrastructure survey -
Page 258 and 259:
70% % of Respondents 'Strongly Agre
Page 260 and 261:
Shoalhaven City Council CSP Review
Page 262 and 263:
CSP Review Project Shoalhaven City
Page 264 and 265:
Community Feedback Email, Voicemail
Page 266 and 267:
a wide ranging engagement strategy
Page 268 and 269:
advantages and natural qualities" D
Page 270 and 271:
D13/859 80 K Other Fails to actuall
Page 272 and 273:
Governance Handbook". D13/840 94 D1
Page 274 and 275:
D13/859 80 D13/859 80 D13/859 80 F
Page 276 and 277:
D13/867 47 AD Strategi es 3.08 shou
Page 278 and 279:
D13/842 87 B Structur e Document la
Page 280 and 281:
D13/842 97 F Structur e Measures in
Page 282 and 283:
D13/857 18 M Objecti ves Many of th
Page 284 and 285:
D13/653 61 D13/842 87 B H Other Oth
Page 286 and 287:
D13/857 18 J Other The Plan refers
Page 288 and 289:
D13/857 27 B Other On engagement, i
Page 290 and 291:
D13/859 80 C Other Accompanying doc
Page 292 and 293:
D13/867 47 N Other Monitoring the C
Page 294 and 295:
D13/683 53 A Strategi es Document v
Page 296 and 297:
D13/801 82 B Strategi es Relevance
Page 298 and 299:
D13/842 87 D13/842 87 L M Strategi
Page 300 and 301:
D13/846 60 A Strategi es There are
Page 302 and 303:
D13/857 18 D13/857 18 G H Strategi
Page 304 and 305:
D13/859 80 D13/867 47 I AE Strategi
Page 306 and 307:
CSP Strategies see also response on
Page 308 and 309:
the Plan. KRAs should be restored t
Page 310 and 311:
D13/867 47 F Structur e No measure
Page 312 and 313:
Citizens and stakeholders represent
Page 314 and 315:
Linked to the Community Strategic P
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
IPART REPORT • Premier, Mike Bair
Page 320 and 321:
IPART REPORT 4
Page 322 and 323:
IPART REPORT • Consulted with all
Page 324 and 325:
Upper House Inquiry • • http://
Page 326 and 327:
Financial Performance 2015/16 • 1
Page 328 and 329:
Page 331:
CCB Letter Independent review forwa
Page 335: CCB Letter Efficiency - outlined on
Page 339: IPART Review of Rating System IPART
Page 343: TCorp • The Council has a mainten
Page 347: Information to Incoming 2012 Counci
Page 353: Current proposal • 2 x 11.5% rate
Page 359: • Building and Infrastructure Ass
Page 363: Special rates fund Maintenance - pr
Page 367: • The average score (4.9 out of 1
Page 377: Other Revenue Measures • Fees and
Page 381: Council Municipality of Hunters Hil
Page 399: Example of Bridge Croziers Road - A
Page 403: Renewal Planning Methodology • Us
Page 407: Monitoring Assets -Roads Sealed Roa
Page 411: Road sealing
Page 415: Appendix 11 - Written Submissions
Page 499 and 500:
Guest Book Feedback As of 10 Februa
Page 501 and 502:
week. well the council is getting p
Page 503 and 504:
04 Feb 2017 Stephen Pinfield This c
Page 505 and 506:
Appendix 13 - Combined CCB Submissi
Page 507 and 508:
associated implications for the cos
Page 509:
our proposals, and viability risks
show all

Special Rate Variation Community Engagement Report - Shoalhaven City Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?