27.03.2017 Views

Malawi 2015-16

FR319

FR319

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In <strong>Malawi</strong>, almost all urban households (98%) have access to an improved source of drinking water<br />

compared with only 85% of rural households (Table 2.1). Improved sources of water protect against<br />

outside contamination so that the water is more likely to be safe to drink.<br />

Urban and rural households rely on<br />

different sources of drinking water.<br />

The main sources of drinking water<br />

for urban households are piped<br />

water in their dwelling or yard<br />

(41%) and public tap or standpipe<br />

(33%). In contrast, rural households<br />

rely on tube well or borehole<br />

(72%), followed by unimproved<br />

sources (15%) (Figure 2.1). In<br />

rural areas, only 2% of households<br />

have piped water on their premises<br />

and 47% of households travel 30<br />

minutes or longer round trip to<br />

fetch drinking water.<br />

Clean water is a basic need for<br />

Total Urban Rural<br />

human life. However, seven in ten<br />

households (69%) report that they do no treat their water prior to drinking. Treatment is less common in<br />

urban areas than rural areas; 78% of urban households do not treat water compared with 67% in rural<br />

areas. Adding bleach or chlorine to drinking water before drinking is the most common water treatment<br />

(20%). A total of 26% of households in <strong>Malawi</strong> are using an appropriate treatment method with 20% in<br />

urban areas and 27% in rural areas.<br />

Table 2.2 presents information on the percentage of households using piped water or water from a tube<br />

well or borehole that reported availability of water in the last 2 weeks. Seventy-five percent of households<br />

in <strong>Malawi</strong> reported having water with no interruption of at least a single day in the last 2 weeks. Urban<br />

households are more likely to report no availability of water for at least 1 day compared with rural<br />

households (55% versus 18%).<br />

Trends: There was little variation in the percentage of households using water from an improved water<br />

source between 1992 and 2004. However, the percentage has been increasing steadily from 65% in 2004 to<br />

80% in 2010 and 87% in <strong>2015</strong>-<strong>16</strong>.<br />

2.2 SANITATION<br />

Figure 2.1 Household drinking water by residence<br />

Percent distribution of households by source of drinking water<br />

13<br />

4<br />

62<br />

10<br />

3<br />

8<br />

Improved toilet facilities<br />

Include any non-shared toilet of the following types: flush/pour flush toilets to<br />

piped sewer systems, septic tanks, and pit latrines; ventilated improved pit<br />

(VIP) latrines; pit latrines with slabs; and composting toilets.<br />

Sample: Households<br />

2<br />

10<br />

33<br />

12<br />

41<br />

2<br />

15<br />

4<br />

72<br />

6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Unimproved source<br />

Protected dug well<br />

Tubewell or borehole<br />

Public tap/standpipe<br />

Piped to neighbor<br />

Piped water into<br />

dwelling/yard/plot<br />

10 • Housing Characteristics and Household Population

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!