27.12.2012 Views

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a 7.3 · Diagnosis 115<br />

The vast majority of cases of ALL (~ 85%) are of B<br />

lineage. These have been grouped into further subtypes,<br />

which may correspond to different levels of maturation<br />

in normal B-cell development. However, such differentiation<br />

schemes are not universally agreed upon and<br />

the terminology for the different subtypes is also not<br />

uniform. In fact, due to the lack of conformity, and<br />

the questionable significance of the further subclassification,<br />

the WHO classification scheme simply classifies<br />

cases as “precursor-B” and “precursor-T” ALL without<br />

additional categorization. The most common B-lineage<br />

ALL is the precursor-B phenotype with B-cell markers<br />

(CD19, CD22), TdT, cytoplasmic CD79A, CD34, CD10<br />

(CALLA), and lack of cytoplasmic l (cl) and of surface<br />

immunoglobulin (sIg) expression. This type has variably<br />

been called “common precursor B” ALL, or “early<br />

precursor-B” ALL. A less common type lacks CALLA<br />

and may be at an earlier level of maturation that has<br />

been termed “pro-B” ALL. This type has a worse prognosis.<br />

A type with more maturation than common precursor-B<br />

ALL is characterized by the presence of cl, and<br />

is referred to as “Pre-B”ALL. Reports are conflicting,<br />

but this may be more commonly associated with<br />

t(1;19)(q23;p13). Burkitt leukemia has the immunophenotype<br />

of mature B cells with sIg expression. Whether<br />

rare cases of non-Burkitt ALL also exhibit a mature B<br />

phenotype (sIg+) is questionable, although such cases<br />

have been reported on [31]. B-lineage ALL phenotypes<br />

are listed in Table 7.2 C.<br />

T lineage ALL accounts for only 15–20% of cases<br />

and can also be separated into phenotypic groups<br />

which may correspond to different stages of thymic Tcell<br />

development [32]. As in B-lineage ALL, a type<br />

with intermediate differentiation is the most common.<br />

This “common thymocyte” type shows expression of<br />

the pan T-cell markers, CD2, cytoplasmic CD3 (cCD3),<br />

CD7, and CD5 and distinctively shows coexpression of<br />

CD4 and CD8, and expression of CD1a. A more primitive<br />

type called “prothymocyte” or “immature thymocyte”<br />

type has TdT, cCD3, and variable expression of<br />

CD5, CD2, and CD7, but lacks CD4, CD8, and CD1a. A<br />

more mature phenotype than the “common thymocyte”<br />

type has variable TdT, the pan T-cell markers,<br />

CD4 or CD8 but lacks CD1a. Again, because of lack of<br />

conformity and variability of marker expression, the<br />

WHO classification recognizes only the “precursor-T”<br />

group without further immunophenotypic categorization<br />

[12]. T-lineage ALL phenotypes are listed in Table<br />

7.2 D.<br />

Table 7.3. Scoring system for biphenotypic leukemia<br />

Score<br />

Lineage<br />

B-lymphoid T-lymphoid Myeloid<br />

2 cCD79A cCD3<br />

MPO<br />

cl<br />

cCD22<br />

anti-TCR<br />

1 CD19<br />

CD20<br />

CD10<br />

0.5 TdT<br />

CD24<br />

CD2<br />

CD5<br />

CD8<br />

CD10<br />

TdT<br />

CD7<br />

CD1a<br />

CD117<br />

CD13<br />

CD33<br />

CD65<br />

CD14<br />

CD15<br />

CD64<br />

Greater than 2 points are needed to consider a lineage involved [36]<br />

Coexpression of other nonlymphoid markers is<br />

common on the lymphoblasts in both precursor-B and<br />

precursor-T ALL, and does not necessarily indicate bilineal<br />

potential. The myeloid markers, CD13 and CD33,<br />

are the most frequently expressed [33]. In the past, these<br />

have erroneously been interpreted as indicating a biphenotypic<br />

process and a worse prognosis, but more recently,<br />

this has not been found [34, 35]. Recently, more<br />

strict criteria with a uniform grading system have been<br />

instituted to help define the “biphenotypic” entity, illustrated<br />

in Table 7.3 [36]. Cytoplasmic expression of myeloperoxidase<br />

in ALL has also been reported by flow cytometric<br />

analysis. However, this does not correspond to<br />

the cytochemical detection of enzyme reactivity, and<br />

when identified with a polyclonal antibody, it is of only<br />

questionable significance [37].<br />

Differential diagnostic considerations that have to<br />

be considered in immunophenotyping include hematogones,<br />

thymoma, biphenotypic leukemia, and CML presenting<br />

in lymphoid blast phase. Hematogones have the<br />

same immunophenotype as common precursor B ALL<br />

cells, but the hematogones exhibit a spectrum of maturation<br />

with a continuum of cells from immature to<br />

mature showing loss of CD34, and gain of CD20 and<br />

sIg [38, 39].<br />

Thymoma cells have the phenotype of common thymocytes,<br />

and cannot be distinguished from common T<br />

ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma by immunophenotype<br />

alone. Correlation with clinical presentation and histology<br />

are important for the correct interpretation. When

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!