Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a 7.3 · Diagnosis 115<br />
The vast majority of cases of ALL (~ 85%) are of B<br />
lineage. These have been grouped into further subtypes,<br />
which may correspond to different levels of maturation<br />
in normal B-cell development. However, such differentiation<br />
schemes are not universally agreed upon and<br />
the terminology for the different subtypes is also not<br />
uniform. In fact, due to the lack of conformity, and<br />
the questionable significance of the further subclassification,<br />
the WHO classification scheme simply classifies<br />
cases as “precursor-B” and “precursor-T” ALL without<br />
additional categorization. The most common B-lineage<br />
ALL is the precursor-B phenotype with B-cell markers<br />
(CD19, CD22), TdT, cytoplasmic CD79A, CD34, CD10<br />
(CALLA), and lack of cytoplasmic l (cl) and of surface<br />
immunoglobulin (sIg) expression. This type has variably<br />
been called “common precursor B” ALL, or “early<br />
precursor-B” ALL. A less common type lacks CALLA<br />
and may be at an earlier level of maturation that has<br />
been termed “pro-B” ALL. This type has a worse prognosis.<br />
A type with more maturation than common precursor-B<br />
ALL is characterized by the presence of cl, and<br />
is referred to as “Pre-B”ALL. Reports are conflicting,<br />
but this may be more commonly associated with<br />
t(1;19)(q23;p13). Burkitt leukemia has the immunophenotype<br />
of mature B cells with sIg expression. Whether<br />
rare cases of non-Burkitt ALL also exhibit a mature B<br />
phenotype (sIg+) is questionable, although such cases<br />
have been reported on [31]. B-lineage ALL phenotypes<br />
are listed in Table 7.2 C.<br />
T lineage ALL accounts for only 15–20% of cases<br />
and can also be separated into phenotypic groups<br />
which may correspond to different stages of thymic Tcell<br />
development [32]. As in B-lineage ALL, a type<br />
with intermediate differentiation is the most common.<br />
This “common thymocyte” type shows expression of<br />
the pan T-cell markers, CD2, cytoplasmic CD3 (cCD3),<br />
CD7, and CD5 and distinctively shows coexpression of<br />
CD4 and CD8, and expression of CD1a. A more primitive<br />
type called “prothymocyte” or “immature thymocyte”<br />
type has TdT, cCD3, and variable expression of<br />
CD5, CD2, and CD7, but lacks CD4, CD8, and CD1a. A<br />
more mature phenotype than the “common thymocyte”<br />
type has variable TdT, the pan T-cell markers,<br />
CD4 or CD8 but lacks CD1a. Again, because of lack of<br />
conformity and variability of marker expression, the<br />
WHO classification recognizes only the “precursor-T”<br />
group without further immunophenotypic categorization<br />
[12]. T-lineage ALL phenotypes are listed in Table<br />
7.2 D.<br />
Table 7.3. Scoring system for biphenotypic leukemia<br />
Score<br />
Lineage<br />
B-lymphoid T-lymphoid Myeloid<br />
2 cCD79A cCD3<br />
MPO<br />
cl<br />
cCD22<br />
anti-TCR<br />
1 CD19<br />
CD20<br />
CD10<br />
0.5 TdT<br />
CD24<br />
CD2<br />
CD5<br />
CD8<br />
CD10<br />
TdT<br />
CD7<br />
CD1a<br />
CD117<br />
CD13<br />
CD33<br />
CD65<br />
CD14<br />
CD15<br />
CD64<br />
Greater than 2 points are needed to consider a lineage involved [36]<br />
Coexpression of other nonlymphoid markers is<br />
common on the lymphoblasts in both precursor-B and<br />
precursor-T ALL, and does not necessarily indicate bilineal<br />
potential. The myeloid markers, CD13 and CD33,<br />
are the most frequently expressed [33]. In the past, these<br />
have erroneously been interpreted as indicating a biphenotypic<br />
process and a worse prognosis, but more recently,<br />
this has not been found [34, 35]. Recently, more<br />
strict criteria with a uniform grading system have been<br />
instituted to help define the “biphenotypic” entity, illustrated<br />
in Table 7.3 [36]. Cytoplasmic expression of myeloperoxidase<br />
in ALL has also been reported by flow cytometric<br />
analysis. However, this does not correspond to<br />
the cytochemical detection of enzyme reactivity, and<br />
when identified with a polyclonal antibody, it is of only<br />
questionable significance [37].<br />
Differential diagnostic considerations that have to<br />
be considered in immunophenotyping include hematogones,<br />
thymoma, biphenotypic leukemia, and CML presenting<br />
in lymphoid blast phase. Hematogones have the<br />
same immunophenotype as common precursor B ALL<br />
cells, but the hematogones exhibit a spectrum of maturation<br />
with a continuum of cells from immature to<br />
mature showing loss of CD34, and gain of CD20 and<br />
sIg [38, 39].<br />
Thymoma cells have the phenotype of common thymocytes,<br />
and cannot be distinguished from common T<br />
ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma by immunophenotype<br />
alone. Correlation with clinical presentation and histology<br />
are important for the correct interpretation. When