27.12.2012 Views

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a 5.3 · Etiology 85<br />

tern of ALL diagnosis or symptoms. Karimi and Yarmohammadi<br />

found a late fall, early winter peak in Iran,<br />

Sorensen et al. [138] a fall peak in Denmark, Higgins<br />

et al. [44], Westerbeek et al. [157] and Badrinath et al.<br />

[7] summer peaks in Europe, and Ross and colleagues<br />

[123] a summer peak in the northern USA, with approximately<br />

a 7.5% excess over the mean in July and August.<br />

This suggests a possible link to allergic and infections<br />

processes in the summer that may trigger the ALL<br />

disease process, although further research is needed to<br />

more precisely define this effect.<br />

5.3.2 Physical Factors<br />

5.3.2.1 Ionizing Radiation<br />

The importance of ionizing radiation as an etiologic<br />

agent for leukemia and other lymphohematopoeitic<br />

cancers has been known since the early 1900s from<br />

studies of radiologists [8]. However, the most compelling<br />

evidence for this association has come from studies<br />

of survivors of the atomic bomb blasts in Hiroshima<br />

and Nagasaki [107] and patients treated for ankylosing<br />

spondylitis [20]. For both of these types of exposures,<br />

leukemias (other than chronic lymphocytic) were noted<br />

as early as 3 years after exposure, with peak incidence<br />

occurring 5–10 years after exposure, and additional<br />

cases were diagnosed even 30 years after exposure<br />

[60]. For ankylosing spondylitis, the strongest effect<br />

was for AML rather than ALL.<br />

There also is evidence for leukemia risk associated<br />

with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation among<br />

those involved with the nuclear industry [75]. Studies of<br />

military personnel on maneuvers at a nuclear bomb test<br />

showed statistically elevated leukemia incidence and<br />

mortality [96], as do the most recent studies of workers<br />

at other nuclear facilities. A review and pooled analysis<br />

of nuclear worker studies conducted by the International<br />

Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found statistically<br />

significant excess relative risks for leukemia<br />

excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia [14]. The leukemia<br />

exposure-response effect was consistent with<br />

but smaller than the values estimated from the studies<br />

atomic bomb survivors reported in the BEIR V report<br />

from the National Research Council [97]. Studies of<br />

workers at naval nuclear shipyards are inconsistent,<br />

while studies of fallout from bomb testing showed small<br />

increases in cases of leukemia [33], particularly acute<br />

leukemias among children, although the interpretations<br />

of these data vary [67, 82, 84, 143].<br />

Prenatal exposures are also a concern. In the 1950s, a<br />

British study showed that radiography of a pregnant<br />

woman’s abdomen increased the child’s risk of leukemia<br />

by about 50% [144]. While this relationship is believed<br />

to be causal, few women today undergo this type of diagnostic<br />

testing, making this a nonissue, at least in<br />

terms of public health impact. Studies of prenatal exposure<br />

from atomic bomb blasts did not show increased<br />

risk, nor did studies of children of atomic bomb survivors<br />

who were not exposed prenatally [160]. However,<br />

those exposed prenatally may have higher risks as<br />

adults [159, 161].<br />

Concern about leukemia risk from ionizing radiation<br />

also arose in the early 1980s from an apparent cluster<br />

among children living in close proximity to the<br />

Sellafield nuclear fuels reprocessing plant in Seascale,<br />

England. Initial studies suggested that residential proximity<br />

to the plant, and paternal employment at the plant<br />

were risk factors [30–32]. Further studies, however, did<br />

not confirm either risk factor [10, 50, 70, 86, 149]. Kinlen<br />

suggested that this situation supports his population<br />

mixing theory [58].<br />

Another suggested physical environmental cause of<br />

leukemia is radionuclides in water and air. For example,<br />

ingestion of radium-containing groundwater in an ecologic<br />

study conducted in Florida showed an association<br />

with leukemia [80]. Subsequent studies seeking to clarify<br />

this issue provided limited support [6, 17, 29]. Studies<br />

examining inhaled radon found an increased risk of<br />

leukemia, through the hypothesized mechanism of irradiation<br />

to the bone marrow. This association was shown<br />

in ecologic studies but not other studies, and thus is unlikely<br />

to be etiologic [71].<br />

5.3.2.2 Nonionizing Radiation<br />

Concern also has been raised over the apparent elevated<br />

leukemia incidence among children and workers exposed<br />

to electric and magnetic fields (EMF) [49, 98,<br />

100]. The risk was first documented in a case-control<br />

study of children who had lived in homes with high<br />

magnetic fields [156], and the results were replicated<br />

in many subsequent population-based studies [22, 79,<br />

131]. Some studies did not show this association [28,<br />

76, 148]. As yet, no mechanism for this risk has been established.<br />

Prompted by positive results in these studies,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!