Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a 5.3 · Etiology 85<br />
tern of ALL diagnosis or symptoms. Karimi and Yarmohammadi<br />
found a late fall, early winter peak in Iran,<br />
Sorensen et al. [138] a fall peak in Denmark, Higgins<br />
et al. [44], Westerbeek et al. [157] and Badrinath et al.<br />
[7] summer peaks in Europe, and Ross and colleagues<br />
[123] a summer peak in the northern USA, with approximately<br />
a 7.5% excess over the mean in July and August.<br />
This suggests a possible link to allergic and infections<br />
processes in the summer that may trigger the ALL<br />
disease process, although further research is needed to<br />
more precisely define this effect.<br />
5.3.2 Physical Factors<br />
5.3.2.1 Ionizing Radiation<br />
The importance of ionizing radiation as an etiologic<br />
agent for leukemia and other lymphohematopoeitic<br />
cancers has been known since the early 1900s from<br />
studies of radiologists [8]. However, the most compelling<br />
evidence for this association has come from studies<br />
of survivors of the atomic bomb blasts in Hiroshima<br />
and Nagasaki [107] and patients treated for ankylosing<br />
spondylitis [20]. For both of these types of exposures,<br />
leukemias (other than chronic lymphocytic) were noted<br />
as early as 3 years after exposure, with peak incidence<br />
occurring 5–10 years after exposure, and additional<br />
cases were diagnosed even 30 years after exposure<br />
[60]. For ankylosing spondylitis, the strongest effect<br />
was for AML rather than ALL.<br />
There also is evidence for leukemia risk associated<br />
with occupational exposure to ionizing radiation among<br />
those involved with the nuclear industry [75]. Studies of<br />
military personnel on maneuvers at a nuclear bomb test<br />
showed statistically elevated leukemia incidence and<br />
mortality [96], as do the most recent studies of workers<br />
at other nuclear facilities. A review and pooled analysis<br />
of nuclear worker studies conducted by the International<br />
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) found statistically<br />
significant excess relative risks for leukemia<br />
excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia [14]. The leukemia<br />
exposure-response effect was consistent with<br />
but smaller than the values estimated from the studies<br />
atomic bomb survivors reported in the BEIR V report<br />
from the National Research Council [97]. Studies of<br />
workers at naval nuclear shipyards are inconsistent,<br />
while studies of fallout from bomb testing showed small<br />
increases in cases of leukemia [33], particularly acute<br />
leukemias among children, although the interpretations<br />
of these data vary [67, 82, 84, 143].<br />
Prenatal exposures are also a concern. In the 1950s, a<br />
British study showed that radiography of a pregnant<br />
woman’s abdomen increased the child’s risk of leukemia<br />
by about 50% [144]. While this relationship is believed<br />
to be causal, few women today undergo this type of diagnostic<br />
testing, making this a nonissue, at least in<br />
terms of public health impact. Studies of prenatal exposure<br />
from atomic bomb blasts did not show increased<br />
risk, nor did studies of children of atomic bomb survivors<br />
who were not exposed prenatally [160]. However,<br />
those exposed prenatally may have higher risks as<br />
adults [159, 161].<br />
Concern about leukemia risk from ionizing radiation<br />
also arose in the early 1980s from an apparent cluster<br />
among children living in close proximity to the<br />
Sellafield nuclear fuels reprocessing plant in Seascale,<br />
England. Initial studies suggested that residential proximity<br />
to the plant, and paternal employment at the plant<br />
were risk factors [30–32]. Further studies, however, did<br />
not confirm either risk factor [10, 50, 70, 86, 149]. Kinlen<br />
suggested that this situation supports his population<br />
mixing theory [58].<br />
Another suggested physical environmental cause of<br />
leukemia is radionuclides in water and air. For example,<br />
ingestion of radium-containing groundwater in an ecologic<br />
study conducted in Florida showed an association<br />
with leukemia [80]. Subsequent studies seeking to clarify<br />
this issue provided limited support [6, 17, 29]. Studies<br />
examining inhaled radon found an increased risk of<br />
leukemia, through the hypothesized mechanism of irradiation<br />
to the bone marrow. This association was shown<br />
in ecologic studies but not other studies, and thus is unlikely<br />
to be etiologic [71].<br />
5.3.2.2 Nonionizing Radiation<br />
Concern also has been raised over the apparent elevated<br />
leukemia incidence among children and workers exposed<br />
to electric and magnetic fields (EMF) [49, 98,<br />
100]. The risk was first documented in a case-control<br />
study of children who had lived in homes with high<br />
magnetic fields [156], and the results were replicated<br />
in many subsequent population-based studies [22, 79,<br />
131]. Some studies did not show this association [28,<br />
76, 148]. As yet, no mechanism for this risk has been established.<br />
Prompted by positive results in these studies,