27.12.2012 Views

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 Chapter 14 · Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia<br />

to be indispensable for the transformation process induced<br />

by BCR-ABL, at least in murine models, as lethally<br />

irradiated mice deficient for STAT5 a/b and infected<br />

with p210 or p190 leukemia develop myeloid<br />

and B-cell tumors [31]. The p190 form of BCR-ABL<br />

phosphorylates phospholipase gamma, and phosphatidylinositol<br />

3' kinase [32], that in turn likely activate<br />

proliferative pathways. In addition, there is evidence<br />

that BCR-ABL acts to inhibit apoptotic pathways [33].<br />

Moreover in CML, BCR-ABL appears to influence adhesion<br />

to bone marrow stromal elements, thus releasing<br />

immature cells into the periphery, as well as divorcing<br />

the cell from adherence-mediated cell cycle control<br />

[34, 35]. It is not known whether this occurs in<br />

Ph+ ALL.<br />

An interesting observation is the fact that the Src kinases<br />

(Lyn, Hck and Fgr), while essential for the induction<br />

of B-ALL by BCR-ABL in mouse models, are not required<br />

for the induction of CML, and the inhibition of<br />

Src kinases independent of the inhibition of BCR-ABL<br />

(by CP76030) inhibits the lymphoid transformation<br />

[36]. This again reinforces that the leukemogenesis of<br />

p190 and p210 ALL and CML may be subtlety but fundamentally<br />

different.<br />

14.2.3 The Biology of p190 Versus p210 BCR-ABL<br />

Several differences among the p190 and p210 fusion<br />

genes have been described in different biological models.<br />

The first characteristic that differentiates both transcripts<br />

is the in vitro kinase activity. The kinase activity<br />

of the chimeric BCR-ABL protein is higher in p190 BCR-<br />

ABL than in the p210 variant (and p210 activity is greater<br />

than the rare p230 BCR-ABL variant, caused by a<br />

more downstream BCR break) [37, 38]. Li et al. uncovered<br />

significant additional differences among the three<br />

different BCR-ABL chimeric proteins [38]. The three<br />

BCR-ABL types transformed in vitro murine myeloid<br />

and lymphoid IL-3 dependent cells, but the transformation<br />

of lymphoid cells (BA/F3) with p190 resulted in the<br />

highest proliferative rate. Furthermore, in a bone marrow<br />

transduction/transplantation system with marrow<br />

enriched for myeloid precursor cells (with donors<br />

treated with 5-FU), mice transplanted with precursors<br />

transduced with any of the three fusion genes developed<br />

a CML-like disease. On the other hand, when using untreated-donors,<br />

a greater percentage of mice transplanted<br />

with p190-transfected marrow developed B-<br />

ALL, and they developed it faster than mice transplanted<br />

with p210- or p230-transfected marrow. The activation<br />

of STAT6, induced by p190 but not by p210, may<br />

be involved in the preferred lymphoid transformation<br />

by p190 BCR-ABL [39].<br />

In addition, there are some clinical data that suggest<br />

that patients with the p190 BCR-ABL do worse than<br />

those with p210 after conventional chemotherapy [40].<br />

Different prognostic value of the persistence of minimal<br />

residual disease after transplant for the two breakpoints,<br />

with p190 BCR-ABL having a worse prognosis [10, 41]<br />

also favors that the different transcripts determine<br />

somewhat different diseases.<br />

14.3 Treatment of Ph+ ALL<br />

Despite modern chemotherapy regimens having improved<br />

the outcome of pediatric and adult ALL in the<br />

last decades, the improved results in the aggregate have<br />

not translated into an improvement in Ph+ ALL, where<br />

treatment with chemotherapy alone still affords dismal<br />

survival statistics [42, 43]. Newer strategies incorporating<br />

Imatinib appear promising for short-term benefits,<br />

but their impact in long-term survival remains to be<br />

seen.<br />

14.3.1 Pediatric Ph+ ALL<br />

Childhood ALL is a paradigm of a malignancy curable<br />

with chemotherapy alone. However, despite cure rates<br />

exceeding 80% with current treatment protocols [44],<br />

children with Ph+ ALL (Table 14.1) have an extremely<br />

poor prognosis when compared to those with Ph-negative<br />

ALL [45–49]. Although most (80–100%) Ph+ ALL<br />

patients will obtain an initial complete remission (CR)<br />

[42, 45–48, 50–55], their event-free survival (EFS) and<br />

overall survival (OS) range from 28–50% and 40–50%<br />

at 5 years. More recent studies incorporate related or<br />

unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations<br />

(HSCT) for first CR Ph+ ALL patients, preferring<br />

to treat these patients with ablative regimens sooner<br />

rather than later [42, 45–48, 54, 56, 57].<br />

Despite the overall poor prognosis in Ph+ ALL, several<br />

studies have defined prognostic subgroups among<br />

pediatric patients with Ph+ ALL. In a meta-analysis of<br />

ten different trials, Arico et al. [42] found that age<br />

and initial WBC, included in the Rome/NCI criteria

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!