27.12.2012 Views

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a 8.5 · Cytogenetic and Molecular Abnormalities 123<br />

8.4.6 Natural Killer ALL (Blastic NK)<br />

Rare cases of ALL have been reported in which the<br />

blasts lack myeloid and lymphoid markers (CD3 and<br />

CD19) but express CD56. These cases are classified as<br />

ALL of the natural killer cell phenotype. Blastic NK cells<br />

may show cytoplasmic CD3 and, occasionally, other Tcell<br />

markers (CD4 or CD7), and can be positive or negative<br />

for TdT. They lack evidence of T-cell receptor gene<br />

rearrangement. These cases should be distinguished<br />

from myeloid leukemia that expresses myeloid markers<br />

in addition to CD56. Expression of CD56 can also be<br />

seen in some cases that are typically lymphoblastic,<br />

with clear T-cell surface markers. Such cases should<br />

be considered precursor T-cell ALL with CD56 expression<br />

[52, 61, 71].<br />

8.4.7 Biphenotypic and Bilineage ALL<br />

In biphenotypic leukemia, markers specific for lymphoid<br />

as well as myeloid lineages can coexist in the<br />

same blast population. When two distinct cell populations<br />

coexist, one with lymphoid and the other with<br />

myeloid markers, the term “bilineage” applies. Biphenotypic<br />

and bilineage ALL are lumped together with other<br />

undifferentiated subtypes in the WHO classification of<br />

“acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage.” Despite significant<br />

confusion over the terminology, there is agreement<br />

that cells of ALL can express CD13 or CD33 or both,<br />

especially when they are positive for Philadelphia chromosome.<br />

These cases should be called “ALL with myeloid<br />

markers” rather than “biphenotypic ALL.”<br />

Biphenotypic ALL is characterized by the expression<br />

of lymphoid markers (CD19 with TdT or CD3 with<br />

TdT) along with myeloid markers (MPO with CD13, or<br />

MPO with CD33). Several scoring systems can be used<br />

for the diagnosis of biphenotypic ALL; the Immunologic<br />

Classification of Leukemia is the most widely accepted<br />

[4, 75]. The importance of classification is to decide<br />

whether a patient should be treated for lymphoblastic<br />

leukemia or for myeloid leukemia. For practical<br />

purposes, MD Anderson Cancer Center uses a simplified<br />

approach for classifying these cases with ambiguous<br />

lineage or minimal differentiation. This approach<br />

is based on blasts being negative for MPO and NSE<br />

and positive for TdT (Fig. 8.3). If these blasts express<br />

one of the major lymphoid markers (CD10, CD19,<br />

CD3) or two of the other lymphoid markers, the case<br />

Fig. 8.3. Schematic approach for a clinically useful diagnosis of<br />

leukemia of ambiguous lineage (minimally differentiated) as used by<br />

MD Anderson Cancer Center.<br />

is classified as lymphoblastic leukemia, irrespective of<br />

whether myeloid markers are expressed [4, 14, 31, 49,<br />

71]. Patients who have one myeloid marker but fewer<br />

than two lymphoid markers (other than CD19, CD3, or<br />

CD10) are classified as having ALL with minimal differentiation.<br />

8.4.8 MPO-Positive ALL<br />

This term should be reserved for rare cases of ALL that<br />

demonstrate typical lymphoid markers without myeloid<br />

markers, except for strong positivity (20–30%) for MPO.<br />

Most of these cases show lymphoblasts with deep basophilic<br />

cytoplasm [82]. These cases should be distinguished<br />

from Burkitt cases as well as AML.<br />

8.5 Cytogenetic and Molecular Abnormalities<br />

Approximately 45% of ALL cases demonstrate recurrent<br />

ALL-specific cytogenetic abnormalities on conventional<br />

karyotyping studies, establishing cytogenetic study as a<br />

valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool for evaluating<br />

patients with ALL. In addition, most of these abnormalities<br />

can be detected using fluorescence in-situ hybridization<br />

(FISH), Southern blotting of genomic DNA, and<br />

reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-<br />

PCR) of mRNA. FISH and RT-PCR are used to detect<br />

minimal residual disease and to monitor patients after<br />

therapy; real-time RT-PCR allows the quantitative monitoring<br />

of residual disease. The most common cytogenetic<br />

abnormalities are listed in Table 8.1 and discussed<br />

below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!