27.12.2012 Views

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

154 Chapter 11 · Conventional Therapy in Adult <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Review of the LALA Program<br />

Fig. 11.7. Comparison of Philadelphia-positive ALL patients treated<br />

in the elderly with imatinib mesylate and chemotherapy (AFR09)<br />

with those treated according to our previous protocol (LALAG-97).<br />

replaced, in all patients with WHO performance status<br />

< 3, by therapeutic schedules either similar to those administered<br />

to adults under 60 years of age, or specifically<br />

design for elderly patients. However, “age-adapted”<br />

therapies did not show any advantage in terms of<br />

DFS. Higher toxicity of “young adult-like” therapy was<br />

contrabalanced by a higher relapse rate after “ageadapted”<br />

therapy probably related to lighter maintenance<br />

therapy [52].<br />

Prognosis of Philadelphia-positive elderly ALL<br />

could be transformed by the introduction of imatinib<br />

mesylate [53] and could become even better than that<br />

of the other subtypes of ALL in the elderly. This<br />

prompted the GRAALL to treat apart Philadelphia-positive<br />

and Philadelphia-negative ALL and to implement a<br />

treatment protocol alternating chemotherapy and imatinib<br />

in previously untreated elderly patients with Philadelphia-positive<br />

ALL (AFR09 trial) (Fig. 11.6). Our first<br />

results showed very encouraging data with a projected 1year<br />

event-free survival (EFS) at 57% for patients treated<br />

with imatinib and a 1-year OS at 71% (Fig. 11.7) [54].<br />

11.11 GRAALL Trials (2003–Present)<br />

Despite improvements in outcome of adult patients with<br />

ALL, several questions were still open. Is the current<br />

stratification using standard-risk and high-risk ALL absolutely<br />

adequate in adults? Although risk models have<br />

been proposed, the prevailing view was that the vast majority<br />

of affected adults should be considered having a<br />

high risk of recurrence and that all adult ALL patients<br />

should be treated with intensive protocols. Encouraging<br />

results of T-cell lineage ALL after allografting in a recent<br />

retrospective study [55], together with the poor<br />

outcomes observed in the LALA-94 trial with chemotherapy<br />

alone [24] and the identification of T-cell<br />

lineage subtypes associated with a poor outcome [39],<br />

suggested further studies examining allografts compared<br />

with more intensive chemotherapy regimens.<br />

The use of more intensive chemotherapy regimens<br />

was supported by a retrospective study comparing the<br />

characteristics and outcome of 100 adolescents treated<br />

in the French adult LALA-94 trial and 77 adolescents<br />

treated during the same period in the French pediatric<br />

FRALLE (French <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia)-93<br />

trial [56]. In this study, the comparison pointed out that<br />

adolescents treated in the pediatric protocol had a significantly<br />

better outcome in terms of CR achievement<br />

and EFS. Such a more favorable evolution was not explained<br />

by a difference in patients characteristics, and<br />

was already remarkable after the induction course, suggesting<br />

the major role of drugs and global treating attitude<br />

disparities between pediatric and adults departments.<br />

These results incited not only treatment of adolescents<br />

using pediatric protocols but also the design of<br />

new trials inspired by pediatric protocols to treat young<br />

adults over 20 years. Disparity was particularly observed<br />

in patients with B-cell lineage ALL, but was also<br />

present in patients with T-cell ALL. Differences in induction<br />

courses, which could underlie this gain in CR<br />

rates, were essentially the continuous administration<br />

of higher doses of prednisone and the use of L-asparaginase<br />

in the FRALLE-93 protocol. Higher doses of major<br />

drugs in the treatment of ALL were used in the pediatric<br />

protocol within a shorter period of time. The<br />

3-time daily administration schedule of steroids has<br />

early been demonstrated superior to more spaced administration<br />

in children ALL [57]. Moreover, a recent<br />

study of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute demonstrated<br />

improved response to increased steroids dose in pediatric<br />

patients [58]. Children aged 9–18 years have been<br />

shown to benefit from higher doses of L-asparaginase<br />

despite an increased related toxicity, and repeated doses<br />

of L-asparaginase during early treatment significantly<br />

improved outcome in pediatric patients with T-ALL<br />

[59]. Moreover, the pediatric delayed intensifications appeared<br />

to contribute to an improve outcome. This strategy,<br />

initially proposed by the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster<br />

study group [60], has been demonstrated in children<br />

older than 10 years [61], with increased benefit of an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!