Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
154 Chapter 11 · Conventional Therapy in Adult <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Review of the LALA Program<br />
Fig. 11.7. Comparison of Philadelphia-positive ALL patients treated<br />
in the elderly with imatinib mesylate and chemotherapy (AFR09)<br />
with those treated according to our previous protocol (LALAG-97).<br />
replaced, in all patients with WHO performance status<br />
< 3, by therapeutic schedules either similar to those administered<br />
to adults under 60 years of age, or specifically<br />
design for elderly patients. However, “age-adapted”<br />
therapies did not show any advantage in terms of<br />
DFS. Higher toxicity of “young adult-like” therapy was<br />
contrabalanced by a higher relapse rate after “ageadapted”<br />
therapy probably related to lighter maintenance<br />
therapy [52].<br />
Prognosis of Philadelphia-positive elderly ALL<br />
could be transformed by the introduction of imatinib<br />
mesylate [53] and could become even better than that<br />
of the other subtypes of ALL in the elderly. This<br />
prompted the GRAALL to treat apart Philadelphia-positive<br />
and Philadelphia-negative ALL and to implement a<br />
treatment protocol alternating chemotherapy and imatinib<br />
in previously untreated elderly patients with Philadelphia-positive<br />
ALL (AFR09 trial) (Fig. 11.6). Our first<br />
results showed very encouraging data with a projected 1year<br />
event-free survival (EFS) at 57% for patients treated<br />
with imatinib and a 1-year OS at 71% (Fig. 11.7) [54].<br />
11.11 GRAALL Trials (2003–Present)<br />
Despite improvements in outcome of adult patients with<br />
ALL, several questions were still open. Is the current<br />
stratification using standard-risk and high-risk ALL absolutely<br />
adequate in adults? Although risk models have<br />
been proposed, the prevailing view was that the vast majority<br />
of affected adults should be considered having a<br />
high risk of recurrence and that all adult ALL patients<br />
should be treated with intensive protocols. Encouraging<br />
results of T-cell lineage ALL after allografting in a recent<br />
retrospective study [55], together with the poor<br />
outcomes observed in the LALA-94 trial with chemotherapy<br />
alone [24] and the identification of T-cell<br />
lineage subtypes associated with a poor outcome [39],<br />
suggested further studies examining allografts compared<br />
with more intensive chemotherapy regimens.<br />
The use of more intensive chemotherapy regimens<br />
was supported by a retrospective study comparing the<br />
characteristics and outcome of 100 adolescents treated<br />
in the French adult LALA-94 trial and 77 adolescents<br />
treated during the same period in the French pediatric<br />
FRALLE (French <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia)-93<br />
trial [56]. In this study, the comparison pointed out that<br />
adolescents treated in the pediatric protocol had a significantly<br />
better outcome in terms of CR achievement<br />
and EFS. Such a more favorable evolution was not explained<br />
by a difference in patients characteristics, and<br />
was already remarkable after the induction course, suggesting<br />
the major role of drugs and global treating attitude<br />
disparities between pediatric and adults departments.<br />
These results incited not only treatment of adolescents<br />
using pediatric protocols but also the design of<br />
new trials inspired by pediatric protocols to treat young<br />
adults over 20 years. Disparity was particularly observed<br />
in patients with B-cell lineage ALL, but was also<br />
present in patients with T-cell ALL. Differences in induction<br />
courses, which could underlie this gain in CR<br />
rates, were essentially the continuous administration<br />
of higher doses of prednisone and the use of L-asparaginase<br />
in the FRALLE-93 protocol. Higher doses of major<br />
drugs in the treatment of ALL were used in the pediatric<br />
protocol within a shorter period of time. The<br />
3-time daily administration schedule of steroids has<br />
early been demonstrated superior to more spaced administration<br />
in children ALL [57]. Moreover, a recent<br />
study of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute demonstrated<br />
improved response to increased steroids dose in pediatric<br />
patients [58]. Children aged 9–18 years have been<br />
shown to benefit from higher doses of L-asparaginase<br />
despite an increased related toxicity, and repeated doses<br />
of L-asparaginase during early treatment significantly<br />
improved outcome in pediatric patients with T-ALL<br />
[59]. Moreover, the pediatric delayed intensifications appeared<br />
to contribute to an improve outcome. This strategy,<br />
initially proposed by the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster<br />
study group [60], has been demonstrated in children<br />
older than 10 years [61], with increased benefit of an