Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 Chapter 15 · Burkitt’s <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia (L 3ALL) in Adults<br />
served with this protocol, which was then modified [14].<br />
The second group of patients received only six intrathecal<br />
chemotherapy injections and radiotherapy was given<br />
later in the course of the protocol (after chemotherapy).<br />
Neurological toxicity was significantly reduced<br />
with this less-intensive CNS prophylaxis. CNS relapses<br />
and overall treatment efficacy were not modified [13,<br />
14].<br />
Kantarjian et al. [41] reported results of a protocol<br />
alternating eight cycles of hyper-CVAD (with fractionated<br />
CPM and high dose VAD) and HD MTX (3 g/m 2 )<br />
combined to HD AraC (3 g/m 2 ) and overall 16 intrathecal<br />
injections in 11 cases of L 3ALL. Eight achieved<br />
CR, but the 5-year survival rate was only 33%. Causes<br />
of failure were not detailed. When all mature B cell<br />
ALL cases were considered, only 29% of the cases<br />
could be cured.<br />
The combination of Rituximab and “Burkitt-tailored”<br />
chemotherapy has recently been tested in Burkitt<br />
and Burkitt-like leukemia and lymphoma [42, 43]. Preliminary<br />
results in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients<br />
showed a high response rate in patients with Burkitt<br />
leukemia/lymphoma. Patients with ALL have not<br />
been evaluated separately and it remains to be seen<br />
whether the favorable response rate observed with these<br />
new combinations will translate into improved survival.<br />
Finally, like in children, almost all relapses in adult<br />
disseminated BL and L 3ALL occur within 1 year of diagnosis,<br />
and prolonged maintenance treatment therefore<br />
is also unnecessary in those patients.<br />
15.5 Prognostic Factors in Adult L3ALL<br />
The considerable improvement that has been observed<br />
in the outcome of L 3ALL in adults makes delineation<br />
of the patient population still at high risk of failure with<br />
those regimens particularly important. In the two published<br />
series with sufficiently large numbers of L 3ALL<br />
patients treated “optimally,” patients with poor performance<br />
status at diagnosis [35] and older patients [9]<br />
had somewhat lower CR rates. Patients with CNS involvement<br />
or other extramedullary disease had poorer<br />
outcome in the study of Hoelzer et al. [9]. In the French<br />
SFOP 84 trial, CNS involvement was also a poor prognostic<br />
factor. However, it was no more a prognostic factor<br />
in the SFOP 86 trial, which incorporated higher dose<br />
MTX (8 g/m 2 ), high-dose Ara C 3 g/m 2 , and cranial irradiation<br />
at 24 Gy [28].<br />
Hoelzer, et al. [9] also found high WBC counts<br />
(> 50´10 9 /l) and hemoglobin < 8 g/dl to be associated<br />
with a higher risk of relapse whereas LDH levels had<br />
borderline significance. No other biological prognostic<br />
with prognostic importance clearly exists in L 3ALL.<br />
We found in particular that p53 mutations had no prognostic<br />
value in BL or L3ALL, contrary to most other<br />
hematological malignancies [44].<br />
Recently, additional cytogenetic abnormalities to the<br />
classical c-myc rearrangement were found to be associated<br />
with a poor outcome [45–46]. The prognostic value<br />
of additional cytogenetic abnormalities needs to be<br />
validated on more adult cases but represent new biological<br />
prognostic factors of special interest. Abnormalities<br />
in 1q and 7q detected by CGH analysis could be associated<br />
with a poor outcome in patients with Burkitt lymphoma<br />
or L 3ALL [16].<br />
15.6 Treatment of Resistant and Relapsing<br />
Disease<br />
Experience in the treatment of childhood BL has suggested<br />
that salvage chemotherapy, followed by intensification<br />
with autologous SCT could salvage about 40% of<br />
relapsing patients and patients who achieved only PR<br />
with first-line therapy. Drugs used for salvage chemotherapy<br />
included in particular HD MTX and high-dose<br />
AraC, and/or etoposide and cisplatin.<br />
This relatively high incidence of durable salvage,<br />
however, was mostly reported in selected series of patients<br />
that often had received less than optimal first-line<br />
therapy, and who were able to reach autologous SCT. It<br />
was less clear if similar efficacy could be observed in<br />
unselected patients who had only partial response or relapsed<br />
after first-line treatment using recent intensive<br />
multiagent protocols. For example, Philip et al. [47] reported<br />
the outcome of 27 patients with BL who had relapsed<br />
after the SFOP 84 trial (14% of the patients who<br />
had achieved CR). Three of them had early death; 15 of<br />
the remaining 24 patients had at least partial response<br />
to salvage regimens (VP16 and HD AraC, VP16 and cisplatin<br />
or MIME) and could be autografted. Four of them<br />
had prolonged survival, whereas none of the patients<br />
who could not be autografted survived. Thus, only four<br />
of the 27 patients who relapsed could be durably salvaged.<br />
In the case of adult L3ALL initially treated with conventional<br />
ALL protocols, reports suggest that virtually