Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Acute Leukemias - Republican Scientific Medical Library
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
134 Chapter 9 · General Approach to the Therapy of Adult <strong>Acute</strong> Lymphoblastic Leukemia<br />
zumab may therefore provide additional benefit to patients<br />
with particularly T-cell leukemias or lymphomas.<br />
The group at M.D. Anderson has started to incorporate<br />
alemtuzumab in the hyper-CVAD induction program for<br />
patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell hematopoietic<br />
malignancies. The CALGB is testing alemtuzumab<br />
in the setting of postremission therapy for those patients<br />
whose lymphoblasts were CD52-positive at diagnosis<br />
[8]. In another randomized CALGB study, anti-<br />
B4bR (anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to<br />
blocked ricin) during minimal residual disease showed<br />
little additional clinical evidence [21].<br />
Imatinib is increasingly explored in Philadelphia<br />
chromosome-positive ALL. Thomas et al. pioneered<br />
imatinib-chemotherapy combinations in previously untreated<br />
patients [22]. Imatinib is added at a dose of 400<br />
mg/day for the first 14 days of each of the eight induction/consolidation<br />
courses of the hyper-CVAD regimen<br />
which is followed by 1 year of maintenance with imatinib<br />
at 600 mg orally daily. Of 15 patients who have been<br />
treated with active disease (11 with de novo ALL and<br />
four who were primary failures following nonimatinib<br />
containing induction therapy), all achieved CR. Ten patients<br />
underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation<br />
within a median of 3.5 months. Among 10 patients<br />
who did not undergo transplant, five remain in continuous<br />
CR for a median of 20 months. The German ALL<br />
study group (GMALL) is conducting a randomized<br />
phase II study of induction therapy with imatinib versus<br />
standard induction chemotherapy in patients > 55 years<br />
with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL [23]. In a<br />
preliminary update, all patients treated with imatinib<br />
induction achieved CR whereas two patients assigned<br />
to chemotherapy induction failed and were crossed over<br />
to the imatinib arm. It is hoped that accumulating experience<br />
resulting from these and other regimens will<br />
establish the role of in kinase situs in Philadelphia<br />
chromosome-positive ALL and set a new standard of<br />
care for these patients.<br />
A number of other novel agents are investigated in<br />
relapsed in refractory disease states and include new<br />
nucleoside analogs (clofarabine, nelarabine), liposomal<br />
agents (liposomal vincristine), or hypomethylating<br />
agents (decitabine).<br />
9.4 Conclusion<br />
ALL is a heterogeneous disease where ALL subsets are<br />
characterized by distinct clinical, biological, and thus<br />
prognostic features. In addition to developing novel<br />
therapies, adapting these therapies according to the risk<br />
profile of individual patients has become a main focus<br />
in ALL treatment in recent years [24]. Traditional risk<br />
factors such as age, white blood cell count, time to response,<br />
or cytogenetic abnormalities have shown to influence<br />
outcome. More recently, assessment of minimal<br />
residual disease has emerged as a tool to gauge individual<br />
response following achievement of a complete remission.<br />
The GMALL study group is prospectively monitoring<br />
minimal residual disease of patients during induction<br />
and early consolidation and has started to stratify<br />
patients according to residual disease levels at day<br />
71 as low-, high-, or intermediate risk for relapse. The<br />
goal of these further refinements is clear: (i) identification<br />
of patients who should be transplanted in first CR;<br />
(ii) adjustments of intensity during consolidation; and<br />
(iii) possible modifications in the intensity and duration<br />
of maintenance therapy.<br />
ALL therapy in adults has stepped out of the<br />
shadows from its pediatric role model. Even though<br />
battling the odds seems more cumbersome in adults,<br />
important progress has been made to combine an increasing<br />
understanding of the biology of adult ALL with<br />
the development of novel therapies and the accumulating<br />
experience of the clinical behavior of ALL during<br />
therapy. ALL therapy has become a complex endeavor<br />
and will be even more so in the future. The following<br />
articles in this section will provide a far more in-depth<br />
description of this progress and create an outlook at<br />
state-of-the art therapy in this intriguing disease.<br />
References<br />
1. Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Smith TL, et al. (2000) Results of treatment<br />
with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute<br />
lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 18:547–561<br />
2. Larson RA, Dodge RK, Burns CP, et al. (1995) A five-drug remission<br />
induction regimen with intensive consolidation for adults with<br />
acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B<br />
Study 8811. Blood 85:2025–2037<br />
3. Durrant IJ, Richards, SM, Prentice HG, et al. (2000) The <strong>Medical</strong> Research<br />
Council trials in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. Hem<br />
Onc Clin North Am 14:1327–1352