You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52<br />
40,000<br />
35,000<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
US$/day<br />
In addition, 25-year old vessels must pass their fifth special<br />
survey. With heavy investments required <strong>to</strong> get through<br />
this delicate stage and a very exacting attitude adopted<br />
by inspecting companies, it seems likely that the scrap<br />
option will be increasingly adopted, especially since many<br />
charterers will hesitate <strong>to</strong> engage poorly maintained vessels.<br />
No fewer than 128 VLCCs will reach the age of 25 in<br />
the next three years.<br />
Charterers have been increasing their selective <strong>to</strong>nnage<br />
policy. While several curious disparities exist in their<br />
conclusions, this should continue <strong>to</strong> contribute <strong>to</strong> the<br />
sidelining or elimination of the oldest units.<br />
Finally, shipowners are beginning <strong>to</strong> react <strong>to</strong> oil company<br />
consolidation efforts that have been developing:<br />
• Although the fifteen largest shipowners in the world<br />
currently control around 25% of the world fleet, proof<br />
of the very large number of players in this area, efforts<br />
<strong>to</strong> concentrate have risen over the past five years. The five<br />
largest shipowners have augmented their fleets by 38%,<br />
the next five by 15% and the next five by only 1%.<br />
• On the business level, agreements already exist between<br />
shipowners. For example, the US company OMI and<br />
the Norwegian group Frontline control some thirty Suezmax<br />
vessels.<br />
• Negotiations are expanding in the VLCC sec<strong>to</strong>r and<br />
multiple agreements of this type can be expected, despite<br />
the tradition of individualism in the shipowning business.<br />
The second-hand oil tanker market<br />
The number of vessels changing hands in the second-hand<br />
market for 1999 was - in terms of volume - entirely in<br />
line with what market players experienced in 1998.<br />
Aframax tanker freight rates<br />
Average earnings<br />
80,000 T UK/Continent<br />
80,000 T East Med/West Med<br />
0<br />
Jan 98 Mar 98 May 98 Jul 98 Sep 98 Nov 98 Jan 99 Mar 99 May 99 Jul 99 Sep 99 Nov 99<br />
Nonetheless, the year will remain in the minds of many<br />
as one that seemed lacklustre and dull, ultimately providing<br />
no genuine grounds for optimism concerning the year<br />
<strong>to</strong> come. We have felt for a year now, and continue<br />
<strong>to</strong> feel, that the value of second-hand oil tankers could<br />
only increase if the price per barrel rose, if the supply/<br />
demand ratio were <strong>to</strong> reverse itself in favour of supply and<br />
if a minimum of confidence were <strong>to</strong> be res<strong>to</strong>red. Of these<br />
three conditions, only the price of oil rose, and this was<br />
not due <strong>to</strong> heavy new demand but rather <strong>to</strong> limited supply.<br />
The other two conditions remained unfulfilled, and in fact<br />
the supply/demand ratio, an essential fac<strong>to</strong>r in our mind,<br />
appeared <strong>to</strong> show a negative trend for shipowners.<br />
• The VLCC second-hand market<br />
At the end of November, only nine units had changed<br />
hands compared <strong>to</strong> 17 vessels in 1998 and 20 in 1997.<br />
This figure is deceptive because it includes among<br />
others, one ULCC (alone and unique in its category, the<br />
“Nissei Maru”, which was sold in August for approximately<br />
$10.8 million), two small VLCCs of 240,000 dwt that were<br />
refinanced on the Japanese market, and two vessels built<br />
in the seventies acquired by Chevron from a leasing company.<br />
Therefore, we’ll mention foremost the following sales:<br />
• M/T “C. Bright”, 309,636 dwt, built in 1997, sold in the<br />
first quarter for around $78 million and ten years of back<br />
charter for $32,000/day,<br />
• M/T “Kakuho”, 258,084 dwt, built in 1986, for $20.3<br />
million,<br />
• T/T “New Prosperity”, 271,967 dwt, built in 1981 for<br />
an amount of roughly $7.5 million.<br />
We must observe that the “C. Bright” sale was triggered<br />
by German tax conditions, that the “Kakuho” was purchase<br />
for a s<strong>to</strong>rage project in Vietnam and that “New Prosperity”<br />
was on the market for a year before she was bought at a<br />
substantial discount <strong>to</strong> the listed price. This underscores