The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa
The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa
The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Each protected area can them be assigned to one of three broad groupings,<br />
depending on the ease and/or desirability of developing tourism operations in each. <strong>The</strong><br />
overall ranking within each group will guide allocation of planning resources. This simple<br />
system could be used in the future <strong>for</strong> new NCWCD wildlife protected areas and other<br />
natural sites, to allow them to be placed within an overall ranked list of priorities.<br />
<strong>The</strong> data presented in these summaries has been compiled from NCWCD<br />
reports and publications, including protected areas management plans where these are<br />
available, and from the reports and publications of other regional organi<strong>sa</strong>tions, as well<br />
as from discussions with my colleagues in the NCWCD and its research centers.<br />
Additional in<strong>for</strong>mation was gathered during from site visits to nine of the twelve<br />
protected areas summarised here.<br />
Full data sheets and area maps are presented in Appendix (xx). Summaries only<br />
are given below.<br />
Explanation of Rating Values <strong>for</strong> PA Assessment<br />
Overall Rating<br />
1 = highly suitable <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />
2 = moderately suitable <strong>for</strong> tourism<br />
3 = unsuitable <strong>for</strong> tourism at the present time, or with specialised or<br />
limited public appeal or capacity only;<br />
4 = unsuitable <strong>for</strong> tourism in the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future.<br />
Wildlife Visibility (with regard to named species)<br />
1 = guaranteed, i.e. all visitors will be able to view, regardless of season of<br />
time of day.<br />
2 = probable, i.e. the majority of visitors will be able to view, but likelihood of<br />
viewing may be improved in certain seasons or times of day.<br />
3 = possible, i.e. the majority of visitors would not be expected to view, due to<br />
low density, or to high degree of wariness or other behaviours.<br />
4 = unlikely, i.e. unlikely that any visitors will be able to view, due to extremely<br />
low densities, or to very high degree of wariness or cryptic behaviour.<br />
Other Attributes<br />
Scenery 1 = exceptional scenery with broad public appeal, e.g. large<br />
areas of permanent water, large trees, mountains or<br />
escarpments, or coastal habitats.<br />
63