02.01.2013 Views

The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa

The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa

The Unfenced Desert Towards a strategy for eco ... - Nwrc.gov.sa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

♦ National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC)<br />

Summary Assessment Notes<br />

Scenic and landscape : Attractive, but not spectacular rock <strong>for</strong>mations and<br />

natural vegetation.<br />

Wildlife : Unrivalled site <strong>for</strong> viewing native Arabian species.<br />

Cultural/historical : Rock paintings have only limited public appeal, but<br />

could be developed as part of a tour in the extension.<br />

Existing facilities : Some day, and limited overnight, visits currently<br />

possible and underway, with scope <strong>for</strong> expansion of<br />

numbers without major new facilities being required. A<br />

more natural setting <strong>for</strong> wildlife displays would be<br />

possible, but would require significant development.<br />

Location and access : Easily reached as a day trip from major urban centres.<br />

Sensitivity / security : With regulated or restricted access around certain<br />

animals facilities and enclosures, the NWRC could<br />

easily cope with a reasonable volume of visitors.<br />

Potential activities : Guided tours, by bus, car or on foot, of the NWRC<br />

animal collections, with viewing of educational videos<br />

and talks by staff; visitor centre, lookout points and<br />

circuit drives or walks, with picnic areas, could be<br />

established in the NR extension area, with a selection<br />

of animals visible within large natural enclosures.<br />

Rating<br />

1 = highly suitable <strong>for</strong> tourism; 2 = moderately suitable <strong>for</strong> tourism; 3 = unsuitable <strong>for</strong><br />

tourism at the present time, or with specialised or limited public appeal or capacity only;<br />

4 = unsuitable <strong>for</strong> tourism in the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future.<br />

Scenery : 2<br />

Wildlife : 1<br />

Cultural/historical : 3<br />

Facilities : 1<br />

Access : 1<br />

Sensitivity : 1<br />

Summed Ratings = 9<br />

Ranking 1=/12<br />

Category Group 1: High priority <strong>for</strong> tourism development.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!