07.01.2013 Views

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118<br />

F<strong>org</strong>ing - S tamping - Heat Treating<br />

HEAT TREATMENT and METALLOGRAPHY of STEEL~| j<br />

J<br />

January, 1925<br />

A P r a c t i c a l C o u r s e in t h e E l e m e n t s o f<br />

CHAPTER III—METALLOGRAPHY<br />

PREPARATION OF SPECIMENS*<br />

ONE of the oldest methods of testing steel is the<br />

fracture test, in which the piece is broken, and<br />

the exposed surface, or so-called "grain", carefully<br />

examined. This is still widely used, and to the skilled<br />

observer yields a surprising amount of information as<br />

to the fineness or coarseness of true grain, presence of<br />

blowholes, flaws, or inclusions, overheating or underheating<br />

in heat treatment, approximate carbon content,<br />

etc. However a highly trained eye is needed, the<br />

results are limited at best, and the indications may<br />

readily be misleading. For example, a piece of steel<br />

may show a very different "grain", depending upon<br />

whether it is broken byr gradual bending, or nicked<br />

and broken by a sudden blow. The real grain structure<br />

of metals is generally so small that it is invisible<br />

to the naked eye, and can be revealed only by the<br />

compound microscope.<br />

In an effort to get more accurate information from<br />

studyr of the fracture, an early scientific investigator<br />

used the microscope to examine fractures, but little<br />

was gained, because the surface of the break was too<br />

irregular to permit focusing a microscope of high<br />

power, and a clear image could not be obtained. Moreover,<br />

the act of breaking a piece of metal will generally<br />

distort or destroy at that point, the very structure<br />

which it is desired to examine. Pioneers in Metallog-<br />

*The author wishes to acknowledge his indebtedness to the<br />

following references for information contained in this section,<br />

and to recommend them to the student for further reading: (5)<br />

"The Preparation of Metallographic Specimens," H. M. Boylston,<br />

A.S.S.T. Handbook; (6) Circular of the Bureau of Standards,<br />

No. 113—"Structure and Related Properties of Metals"; (7)<br />

"Introduction to Physical Metallurgy." Rosenhain; (8) "The<br />

Metallography & Heat Treatment of iron and Steel," Sauveur.<br />

P h y s i c a l M e t a l l u r g y<br />

The author is Chief Metallurgist, Naval Aircraft Factory,<br />

United States Navy Yard. Philadelphia, Pa.<br />

Copyright. 1924, by H. C. Knerr.<br />

raphy (Sorby in England, Martens in Germany, Osmond<br />

in France) soon found that the best way to<br />

study the microscopic structure, or "microstructure"<br />

of metals, was to prepare a "section", by grinding a<br />

small flat surface, polishing it to remove all scratches,<br />

and etching it with an acid or other reagent to reveal<br />

the individual grains and constituents. Later it was<br />

found that this process of polishing and etching could<br />

be applied, to larger sections for the purpose of revealing<br />

characteristics large enough to be seen without<br />

the aid of a microscope, that is the "macrostructure."<br />

Taking the specimen for metallographic examination<br />

requires particular care and judgment, for it must<br />

truly represent the part under examination, and the<br />

structure must not be altered in cutting or preparing<br />

the specimen. A record should be made of the position<br />

of the specimen in the piece, and the relation of<br />

the prepared surface to the direction of f<strong>org</strong>ing or<br />

rolling. A sketch is helpful. In most cases a longitudinal<br />

section yields more information than a transverse<br />

section as it shows the effects of elongation due<br />

to working. For a microsection the specimen should<br />

not be larger than necessary, and may in many cases<br />

be quite small. A section y2 inch square or round is a<br />

good size. It is much easier to polish four pieces l/t<br />

inch square than one piece 1 inch square. The height<br />

dimension (perpendicular to the prepared surface)<br />

should also be about y2 inch, for convenience in handling.<br />

If the specimen is too high it is difficult to hold<br />

it true in grinding and polishing, and a rounded surface<br />

results. The polished surface must be true and<br />

flat, otherwise it will be impossible to focus uniformly<br />

at high magnifications, and parts of the image will be<br />

blurred.<br />

When the sample is not too hard or tough, specimens<br />

are generally cut out with a hack saw. Brittle<br />

material may be nicked on an emery wheel and broken<br />

with a hammer. A thin alundum or carborundum<br />

disk wheel about 3/32 in. thick, running in water to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!