07.01.2013 Views

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

332 F<strong>org</strong>ing- Sf amping - Heaf Tieating<br />

in place, the guides can be quickly and easily removed<br />

or replaced. If it is necessary to remove the ram<br />

from the hammer to dress up the die notch, this is<br />

easily done by removing the guides as has just been<br />

described and then dropping the ram and removing it<br />

from the hammer almost at floor level without dismantling<br />

the hammer or even spreading the frames<br />

apart. Other advantages of this construction are that<br />

it is possible to renew the guides in just a few minutes<br />

if a spare set of guides is carried. After the Ys have<br />

been worn they can be dressed up in a small planer; a<br />

large planer capable of passing the whole frame of<br />

the hammer is not required, nor is it necessary to completely<br />

dismantle the hammer. Moreover, by having<br />

only hall of the guides renewable, only half the length<br />

has to be planed that would otherwise be required,<br />

since the single V at the top should last for the life<br />

of the hammer without dressing it up.<br />

As is the case with all Erie Drop Hammers, the<br />

upper works of the hammer form a rigid unit which<br />

can be moved across the anvil from right to left or vice<br />

FIG. 3—Showing the novel type of guide construction.<br />

versa, being moved by adjusting wedges which bear<br />

across the back of the frames for the full width. In<br />

addition to these wedges, provision is made for taking<br />

up wear between the frames and the anvil in the<br />

front and back direction. The overhang of the frame<br />

bears against the back face of the anvil, and at the<br />

front tapered gibs are provided lying on the front<br />

face of the anvil under the over-hanging frame, so<br />

that as wear occurs, the tapered gibs can be tightened<br />

up and the proper fit maintained. This construction<br />

has eliminated the necessity for the tongue and groove<br />

which is usually provided to keep the frames in line<br />

with the anvil and thus it has been possible to provide<br />

September, 1925<br />

an unusually large area at the top of the anvil where<br />

the frame is seated, and it is expected that wear at<br />

this point will practically be eliminated. The latch,<br />

roll release lever, treadle and other similar parts, follow<br />

the well known design of standard Erie Board<br />

Drop Hammers.<br />

Application has been made for patent covering the<br />

special features of the hammer, which have been described<br />

above.<br />

Cause of Blisters<br />

Sample iron plates cast from northern pig irons<br />

were distributed to co-operating enamelers and also<br />

enameled in the Bureau of Standards laboratory. Both<br />

lots of sample plates were found to blister if enameled<br />

above a fairly definite temperature; that is, about 1290<br />

deg. F., according to Technical News Bulletin No. 99,<br />

issued by the bureau.<br />

The three most probable causes of the blisters are<br />

as follows: A certain amount of gas is taken up in<br />

the blast furnace, due to some difference in operating<br />

conditions in northern furnaces. It has been assumed<br />

that, on remelting once in the cupola, the gas is not<br />

removed, but it is on repeated meltings. Just why this<br />

should happen is not clear, because analyses of cast<br />

irons for oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen show no difference<br />

between ordinary and remelted irons. The<br />

second possibility is that some element not shown<br />

by ordinary analysis is present in the pig and is responsible<br />

for the trouble. Spectroscopic analyses fail<br />

to show any difference that can be considered significant.<br />

The third possibility is that graphite may be present<br />

on the surface, and is not wholly removed by sandblasting.<br />

At a sufficiently high enameling temperature<br />

this graphite would react with the oxides of the<br />

enamel to form carbon monoxide, which causes blisters.<br />

By remelting, something might happen to change<br />

the distribution of graphite, so that finally the surface<br />

after sandblasting would be free from graphite.<br />

In view of the possibilities sample plates were pre<br />

pared from two northern irons melted once in the electric<br />

furnace. The scrap produced was also remelted<br />

and cast into sample plates. One Northern iron has<br />

been remelted in the cupola two times and sample<br />

plates cast. The test pieces made by the above methods<br />

have been enameled at the bureau, with promising<br />

results. It was found that all plates cast from the first<br />

melting in the electric furnace blistered, but not so<br />

badly when enameled by the dry process as when<br />

enameled by the wet process.<br />

Sample ,plates obtained by remelting the scrap,<br />

both in the electric furnace and in the cupola, show no<br />

blisters when enameled by the dry process and a decided<br />

reduction in blistering in the wet process. It<br />

appears that remelting the iron several times is beneficial<br />

in reducing the blistering of the enamel. Chemical<br />

analyses of the cupola and electric furnace melts<br />

have been made and microscopic examination now is<br />

in progress.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!