07.01.2013 Views

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

November, 1925<br />

F<strong>org</strong>ing- Stamping - Heat Tieating<br />

A d a p t a b i l i t y o f Electric A r c W e l d i n g<br />

By A. G. BISSELL*<br />

A R C welding as a method of fabricating structural<br />

steel is not a new departure. For quite a fewyears<br />

it has been used in steel ship construction<br />

in the assembly of steel ladders, masts, skylights, funnels,<br />

deck stanchions, tanks, etc. Barges and floating<br />

targets have also been entirely assembled, and pipe<br />

lines, gas holders, oil tanks, small bridges and buildings<br />

completely constructed by electric arc welding.<br />

One interesting application of arc welding in the<br />

erection of a structural steel building was recentlymade<br />

at Eola, 111., where the Chicago, Burlington &<br />

Quincy Railroad erected a 60x40-ft. one-story mill<br />

type building, using scrap steel. An exact duplicate<br />

of this building was also constructed by the riveted<br />

method. Data furnished by W. T. Krattsch, engineer<br />

of buildings of the railroad company, shows the following<br />

comparison in erection costs: Arc Welded Riveted<br />

Preparation cost, including material and<br />

$1,000.00<br />

shop fabrication $381.71<br />

339.50<br />

Field erection cost 404.49<br />

$786.20 $1,339.50<br />

It will be noted that the saving in favor of the arc<br />

welded building lies in the minimum of preparation<br />

required—merely^ the cutting of the steel to required<br />

length. No clip angles, gusset plates or butt straps<br />

are necessary, while besides these, the riveted job involved<br />

shop details and layout, punching, painting,<br />

FIG. 1—This test failed to produce any evidence of weakness<br />

in the welded joints.<br />

reaming and shop fabrication. In the riveted structure<br />

27,100 pounds of steel were used, while but 25,619<br />

pounds were used in the welded structure—a reduction<br />

of 5y per cent in favor of the welded type of<br />

construction. The saving in steel and reduction in<br />

total erection cost in this case resulted in a final saying<br />

of 41.3 per cent where arc welding was used in<br />

place of riveting.<br />

While there have been numerous applications of<br />

arc welding in the fabrication of structural steel, test<br />

•General Engineering Department, Westinghouse Electric<br />

& Manufacturing Company.<br />

409<br />

data involving welded joints has not been complete.<br />

Tests were therefore made of welded joints for tensile,<br />

sheer, static, shock and fatigue strength of such<br />

joints, compared to similar joints made by riveting,<br />

and to the steel members welded together.<br />

Using y2 in. and y in. plates beveled at 60 deg.<br />

and arc welded to form a butt joint as a section subjected<br />

to tensile strength tests, it was found that the<br />

joint in the y> in. plate developed an average tensile<br />

•<br />

• V-v^ ' '*• ^^^^^^<br />

W a<br />

, / * ^ V . . , ; t , ... . '•,<br />

/ r •' .'!S.h7e7dsy/<br />

' ' • • "*%.' ~%^Sf^"Tm~v--y->r;.:/' '••;.•!$ JR-g^ -•"' :„y/-<br />

Wm^frr A",.^ *, •'-'• v •-.•<br />

i sRik \ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ '<br />

•" • !ty-.F '-'Jt^*^^*<br />

*•<br />

:,• ::^-::i0y • -77777,,.: 3S*% .^.. , sj -•**'*>. • ;- •.<br />

FIG. 2—Method of welding the structural steel members<br />

of a roof.<br />

strength of 64,400 pounds per sq. in., with an elongation<br />

of 4 per cent in a 1-inch section across the weld.<br />

The steel in which the joint was made had a tensile<br />

strength of between 65,000 and 70,000 pounds per sq.<br />

in., and failure in the piece occurred in both base and<br />

deposited metal. Welding wire used was hard-drawn<br />

mill-steel, having a carbon content of .17 per cent and<br />

a manganese content of .55 per cent.<br />

In sheer test, a similar joint developed 50,550<br />

pounds per sq. in. in sheer, and when subjected to<br />

static tests, a pressure of 40 tons deformed the supporting<br />

beams completely, but failed to produce any<br />

evidence of failure in the welded joints. In fatigue<br />

test, a riveted and welded joint of similar design were<br />

mounted on a vibratory testing machine and subjected<br />

to a vibration or vertical movement of 1/16 in. at the<br />

rate of 1,760 complete cycles per minute. After 18<br />

hours and 20 minutes, there was hardly a joint in the<br />

riveted member which was not thoroughly loosened,<br />

the rivets worn, the rivet holes enlarged, and a number<br />

of portions broken off the main section. None of<br />

the arc welded portions were weakened or damaged,<br />

and it was necessary, in bringing about its destruction<br />

in a continuance of the test, to append weights<br />

to the outer ends of the riveted beams and arms. When<br />

finally the model failed, failure occurred in the beams<br />

and not in the welded joints. Under a sudden shock<br />

of 700 tons administered directly to an arc welded<br />

joint section, the welds did not fail, even though the<br />

structural steel members of the section were severely<br />

strained and deformed.<br />

j

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!