BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org
BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org
BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
December, 1925<br />
Substantial Savings Made.<br />
F<strong>org</strong>ing - Stamping - Heat Treating<br />
As shown in Tables I and II, the total first cost of<br />
an original set of nickel die blocks is $353.15. These<br />
particular die blocks are usually resunk three times<br />
thereafter at a cost which is equivalent to the labor<br />
and overhead expense of making the original set of<br />
die blocks; the additional annealing and planing cost<br />
when resinking being about equal to the additional<br />
cost of machinery when the die blocks are first made.<br />
Adding the cost of the three resinkings, the total<br />
cost for a set of dies over their entire period of service<br />
is $1,105.04.<br />
The total cost for the carbon steel blocks, including<br />
the three resinkings, is $988.16 over the entire<br />
period of life. With a set of the nickel steel blocks<br />
an average of 37,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings for each sinking is obtained,<br />
or a total of 148,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings during the life<br />
of one set of blocks. The carbon steel blocks last for<br />
a total of 60,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings. To obtain 148,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings<br />
with a set of the nickel alloy die blocks, therefore,<br />
costs $1,105.04. For the same number of f<strong>org</strong>ings<br />
using carbon steel blocks, the cost is $2,437.46. The<br />
saving effected by one set of nickel alloy die blocks<br />
for this job is $1,332.42, which is a reduction in cost<br />
of 54.6 per cent.<br />
A saving in changing labor is effected because<br />
each time a set of die blocks is replaced in a hammer,<br />
an average of 2y2 hours labor is required. The saving<br />
has been determined on the basis that the dies<br />
are changed out of the regular working hours of the<br />
hammer. However, occasionally these changes mean<br />
lost machine time when they have to be made during<br />
working hours, and, because the carbon steel blocks<br />
have to be renewed more than twice as often as the<br />
nickel blocks, there is another saving due to the latter.<br />
Figures Do Lie—Sometimes<br />
While it is the custom to price drop f<strong>org</strong>ings per<br />
piece rather than per pound and which per piece basis<br />
the writer heartily approves—still it is well to roughly<br />
translate them to a mental pound price, that we may<br />
have a better perspective of them.<br />
Some of us have recently become so befogged<br />
with the maze of figures, methods, processes and differentials<br />
left us by the scientific management era<br />
and we have been so busy chasing the elusive minor<br />
elements of Old Man Overhead, that we have overlooked<br />
the fact we are sometimes pricing our product<br />
at net figures that work out less than the pound price<br />
of castings.<br />
If you can make and sell drop f<strong>org</strong>ings in small<br />
quantites at prices less than the basic quantity price<br />
of malleable, or even gray iron in some cases, then<br />
go to it, and stay with it, because this is not intended<br />
for you.<br />
Recently in attempting to analyze some offered<br />
prices, in defense of some current prices that were<br />
challenged as being exhorbitant and apparently so<br />
when compared with the offered prices, it developed<br />
that the offered prices were but one or two cents<br />
more per pound more than the current market rate<br />
of the steel specified for them—and this on quantities<br />
of one thousand only. Others developed that alloy<br />
steel drop f<strong>org</strong>ings including normalizing, were being<br />
offered at less than the large quantity basic rate<br />
of malleable, and barely over the market price per<br />
pound of the steel.<br />
When this was shown to the prospect, even he<br />
readily saw the apparent discrepancy and requested<br />
that the offered figures be checked. The reply was<br />
at some length, entirly academic, laying great emphasis<br />
on how carefully every detail of the estimated<br />
cost of every proposed operation was prepared, computed,<br />
stressed with its proper departmental burden,<br />
and the administrative burden applied as moderately<br />
as conditions would permit, etc., etc. But if the Super-<br />
Accountant who had prepared that cost and price,<br />
had gone at it in the old fashioned way, of saying<br />
the piece will weigh so much and take so much to<br />
make one, which at so much per pound for the stuff<br />
(the market price of the steel) he would have found<br />
that up to this point he cost would have exceeded the<br />
price he offered even before getting into the basic<br />
items of direct f<strong>org</strong>ing and die expense and aside<br />
from whatever burdens, overheads or other such details<br />
that should be added, irrespective of what you<br />
call them or how or why or to what extent if any<br />
you apply them—of course if it was contemplated to<br />
use bargain or liquidated steel then this is another<br />
matter—but we have seen so many such, and on such<br />
a large range of possible sizes, grades, qualities and<br />
quantities of steel that might be required—then possibly<br />
those fellows have discovered a perpetual source<br />
of such material.<br />
Definite figures and specific cases have been purposely<br />
avoided herewith (although they can be afforded<br />
in abundance)—simply to distinguish this article<br />
from one, which might have any inference or<br />
formula as to how you should figure your estimates<br />
or price your Stuff, other than to suggest that after<br />
you have completed your acre or so of figures, to<br />
stand off, look at the piece, say—how much will it<br />
weigh; how much will I get for it; how much per day<br />
will I get for the use of the hammer and crew; how<br />
much will I get for the whole job—rather than to<br />
gamble your dollars and possibly your business and<br />
your future on those verified cost analyses or with<br />
whatever title your Exalted Comptrollership dignifies<br />
them.—The Old Man.<br />
A. S. S. T. Sectional Meeting<br />
The Winter Sectional Meeting of the American<br />
Society for Steel Treating will be held at Hotel Statler,<br />
Buffalo, on Thursday and Friday, January 21 and<br />
22, 1926.<br />
The first meeting of the newly elected directors<br />
will be held at Hotel Statler the day preceding the<br />
opening of the Sectional meeting.<br />
Chairman G. J. Armstrong of the Buffalo Chapter<br />
has his committees actively at work making arrangements<br />
for the meeting and all indications point to<br />
another successful meeting. Chairman Armstrong<br />
has appointed the following committees:<br />
Publicity Committee—Chairman, B. L. McCarthy,<br />
O. W. Mueller, F. G. Moore. Dinner Committee—<br />
Chairman, G. J. Armstrong, W. J. Gamble. Entertainment<br />
and Arrangements—Chairman, O. W. Mueller,<br />
F. B. Lounsberry, W. H. Blocksidge, D. Bell, F. G.<br />
Brost, C. R. Pafenback, F. C. Burkardt, R. E. Sherlock.<br />
Finance Committee—Chairman, B. Clements,<br />
B. D. Wells. Registration Committee—Chairman, B.<br />
L. McCarthy, W. S. Miller, F. L. Weaver.<br />
m