07.01.2013 Views

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

BBBBflt] «BlJIUrIrlr - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

December, 1925<br />

Substantial Savings Made.<br />

F<strong>org</strong>ing - Stamping - Heat Treating<br />

As shown in Tables I and II, the total first cost of<br />

an original set of nickel die blocks is $353.15. These<br />

particular die blocks are usually resunk three times<br />

thereafter at a cost which is equivalent to the labor<br />

and overhead expense of making the original set of<br />

die blocks; the additional annealing and planing cost<br />

when resinking being about equal to the additional<br />

cost of machinery when the die blocks are first made.<br />

Adding the cost of the three resinkings, the total<br />

cost for a set of dies over their entire period of service<br />

is $1,105.04.<br />

The total cost for the carbon steel blocks, including<br />

the three resinkings, is $988.16 over the entire<br />

period of life. With a set of the nickel steel blocks<br />

an average of 37,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings for each sinking is obtained,<br />

or a total of 148,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings during the life<br />

of one set of blocks. The carbon steel blocks last for<br />

a total of 60,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings. To obtain 148,000 f<strong>org</strong>ings<br />

with a set of the nickel alloy die blocks, therefore,<br />

costs $1,105.04. For the same number of f<strong>org</strong>ings<br />

using carbon steel blocks, the cost is $2,437.46. The<br />

saving effected by one set of nickel alloy die blocks<br />

for this job is $1,332.42, which is a reduction in cost<br />

of 54.6 per cent.<br />

A saving in changing labor is effected because<br />

each time a set of die blocks is replaced in a hammer,<br />

an average of 2y2 hours labor is required. The saving<br />

has been determined on the basis that the dies<br />

are changed out of the regular working hours of the<br />

hammer. However, occasionally these changes mean<br />

lost machine time when they have to be made during<br />

working hours, and, because the carbon steel blocks<br />

have to be renewed more than twice as often as the<br />

nickel blocks, there is another saving due to the latter.<br />

Figures Do Lie—Sometimes<br />

While it is the custom to price drop f<strong>org</strong>ings per<br />

piece rather than per pound and which per piece basis<br />

the writer heartily approves—still it is well to roughly<br />

translate them to a mental pound price, that we may<br />

have a better perspective of them.<br />

Some of us have recently become so befogged<br />

with the maze of figures, methods, processes and differentials<br />

left us by the scientific management era<br />

and we have been so busy chasing the elusive minor<br />

elements of Old Man Overhead, that we have overlooked<br />

the fact we are sometimes pricing our product<br />

at net figures that work out less than the pound price<br />

of castings.<br />

If you can make and sell drop f<strong>org</strong>ings in small<br />

quantites at prices less than the basic quantity price<br />

of malleable, or even gray iron in some cases, then<br />

go to it, and stay with it, because this is not intended<br />

for you.<br />

Recently in attempting to analyze some offered<br />

prices, in defense of some current prices that were<br />

challenged as being exhorbitant and apparently so<br />

when compared with the offered prices, it developed<br />

that the offered prices were but one or two cents<br />

more per pound more than the current market rate<br />

of the steel specified for them—and this on quantities<br />

of one thousand only. Others developed that alloy<br />

steel drop f<strong>org</strong>ings including normalizing, were being<br />

offered at less than the large quantity basic rate<br />

of malleable, and barely over the market price per<br />

pound of the steel.<br />

When this was shown to the prospect, even he<br />

readily saw the apparent discrepancy and requested<br />

that the offered figures be checked. The reply was<br />

at some length, entirly academic, laying great emphasis<br />

on how carefully every detail of the estimated<br />

cost of every proposed operation was prepared, computed,<br />

stressed with its proper departmental burden,<br />

and the administrative burden applied as moderately<br />

as conditions would permit, etc., etc. But if the Super-<br />

Accountant who had prepared that cost and price,<br />

had gone at it in the old fashioned way, of saying<br />

the piece will weigh so much and take so much to<br />

make one, which at so much per pound for the stuff<br />

(the market price of the steel) he would have found<br />

that up to this point he cost would have exceeded the<br />

price he offered even before getting into the basic<br />

items of direct f<strong>org</strong>ing and die expense and aside<br />

from whatever burdens, overheads or other such details<br />

that should be added, irrespective of what you<br />

call them or how or why or to what extent if any<br />

you apply them—of course if it was contemplated to<br />

use bargain or liquidated steel then this is another<br />

matter—but we have seen so many such, and on such<br />

a large range of possible sizes, grades, qualities and<br />

quantities of steel that might be required—then possibly<br />

those fellows have discovered a perpetual source<br />

of such material.<br />

Definite figures and specific cases have been purposely<br />

avoided herewith (although they can be afforded<br />

in abundance)—simply to distinguish this article<br />

from one, which might have any inference or<br />

formula as to how you should figure your estimates<br />

or price your Stuff, other than to suggest that after<br />

you have completed your acre or so of figures, to<br />

stand off, look at the piece, say—how much will it<br />

weigh; how much will I get for it; how much per day<br />

will I get for the use of the hammer and crew; how<br />

much will I get for the whole job—rather than to<br />

gamble your dollars and possibly your business and<br />

your future on those verified cost analyses or with<br />

whatever title your Exalted Comptrollership dignifies<br />

them.—The Old Man.<br />

A. S. S. T. Sectional Meeting<br />

The Winter Sectional Meeting of the American<br />

Society for Steel Treating will be held at Hotel Statler,<br />

Buffalo, on Thursday and Friday, January 21 and<br />

22, 1926.<br />

The first meeting of the newly elected directors<br />

will be held at Hotel Statler the day preceding the<br />

opening of the Sectional meeting.<br />

Chairman G. J. Armstrong of the Buffalo Chapter<br />

has his committees actively at work making arrangements<br />

for the meeting and all indications point to<br />

another successful meeting. Chairman Armstrong<br />

has appointed the following committees:<br />

Publicity Committee—Chairman, B. L. McCarthy,<br />

O. W. Mueller, F. G. Moore. Dinner Committee—<br />

Chairman, G. J. Armstrong, W. J. Gamble. Entertainment<br />

and Arrangements—Chairman, O. W. Mueller,<br />

F. B. Lounsberry, W. H. Blocksidge, D. Bell, F. G.<br />

Brost, C. R. Pafenback, F. C. Burkardt, R. E. Sherlock.<br />

Finance Committee—Chairman, B. Clements,<br />

B. D. Wells. Registration Committee—Chairman, B.<br />

L. McCarthy, W. S. Miller, F. L. Weaver.<br />

m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!