07.01.2013 Views

Interlude - Index of

Interlude - Index of

Interlude - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix A<br />

Early NetApp Business Plan<br />

This is a very early NetApp business plan, requesting seed-<br />

round funding, written by Mike Malcolm, James Lau, and me<br />

in the two months following our first discussions. As you can<br />

see, we did not yet have NetApp as a company name. Back then<br />

we used the term server, as opposed to storage system, so you’ll<br />

see some terminology differences from the rest <strong>of</strong> the book. In<br />

the book, I changed our early name from 1-800-SERVERS to<br />

1-800-STORAGE to reduce confusion. Included at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the business plan is a preliminary specification for the product<br />

itself.<br />

Be careful what lessons you take from this. Given that we<br />

never did manage to convince any venture capitalists to fund<br />

us until after we shipped product, perhaps budding entrepreneurs<br />

would be best <strong>of</strong>f not copying this plan. On the other<br />

hand, a first-round investment <strong>of</strong> $1 million would have<br />

yielded over $2 billion worth <strong>of</strong> stock eight years later, so perhaps<br />

the real lesson is for VCs. Looking back, I can see that<br />

some areas came out just as we predicted, and in other areas<br />

we were completely <strong>of</strong>f base. I’d say the biggest flaw is that the<br />

plan focuses too much on markets, technology, and competitors,<br />

but not enough on sales strategy or customers, which are<br />

equally important. That reflects the strengths and weaknesses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three <strong>of</strong> us as the founding team <strong>of</strong> a company.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!