09.01.2013 Views

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the third edition of a book by Nilus called The Great in the Small, which was about the coming<br />

of the Antichrist. Nilus said that the Protocols were translated from the French text of a speech<br />

made to 300 influential Jews. A prostitute allegedly stole the document from a leading Jew. A<br />

copy was received by the British Museum in London, in August, 1906, where it was translated<br />

by English journalist Victor Marsden, who published it in 1921. Marsden said that he couldn’t<br />

work on the translation for more than an hour at a time, because of the evil he felt while reading<br />

it. In 1917, Nilus revised and expanded his book, which he called, He is Near, At the Door: Here<br />

Comes the Antichrist and the Reign of the Devil on Earth. Nilus wrote: “These Protocols are<br />

nothing else than a strategic plan for the conquest of the world ... presented to the Council of the<br />

Elders by ... Theodor Herzl, at the time of the first Zionist Congress (held by the World Zionist<br />

Organization in 1897, at Basel, Switzerland).” However, in his 1905 edition, he said that the<br />

Protocols had been given in 1902-03. In fact, with each subsequent edition that appeared in<br />

different countries, the origin of the document was different.<br />

On August 16, 17, and 18, 1921, the New York Times ran editorials by Phillip Graves, a<br />

London Times correspondent, who said that the Protocols had been copied from a rare 1864<br />

French political satire called Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (also<br />

referred to as the Dialogues of Geneva by the London Times because Geneva had been identified<br />

as a center of revolutionary activities) by lawyer Maurice Joly (1831-1878). It was a pamphlet<br />

containing a conversation between Montesquieu (presenting a case for liberalism) and<br />

Machiavelli (who represented autocracy) which criticized the government of Napoleon III (who<br />

was deposed in 1871). Being illegal to criticize the Monarchy, he fictionalized it, making<br />

Napoleon the character of Machiavelli, to explain the Emperor’s underlying motives. Joly had it<br />

printed in Belgium, then attempted to have it smuggled over the French border. It was seized by<br />

the police, who confiscated as many copies as they could, then banned the book. The police<br />

traced the book to Joly, who was then tried on April 25, 1865, and sentenced to fifteen months in<br />

prison. At the Berne trials, a witness for the prosecution tried to prove that Joly was a Jew, and<br />

that his book was a coded version of the Jewish plan for world domination. Another writer,<br />

Victor Hugo (1802-1885), a Grand Master of the Prieuré de Sion (1844-1885) who in 1849 made<br />

a reference to the ‘United States of Europe,’ wrote satirical poetry against Napoleon III.<br />

As it turns out, over 160 passages from the Protocols are similar to Joly’s book, which is<br />

about half the text. Some sections are almost word for word. The only major change is that it was<br />

altered from the past, to the future.<br />

Some researchers believe that either, Joly was given the minutes to a Masonic meeting by<br />

Adolphe Cremieux (a Mason and Rosicrucian), who urged Joly to write the book, which he did<br />

under the pseudonym of “Mr. X”; or that the minutes were from a Marxist meeting which took<br />

place in a Masonic lodge in Geneva, and had been stored in the archives of the Mizraim Masonic<br />

Lodge in Paris, where Cremieux, who sat on the Supreme Council, discovered them.<br />

Who could have forged the Protocols isn’t known, if in fact it is a forgery. Some researchers<br />

claim it was done in Russia, in 1904, by agents of the Czar. However, the general consensus is<br />

that it was probably done by Elie de Cyon (Ilya Tsion), a Russian journalist living in Paris, who<br />

was an opponent of Sergey Witte, the Russian Minister of Finance.<br />

When Witte took office in 1892, he began to modernize Russia by doubling steel, iron, and<br />

coal production; and constructing railroads. He was disliked by those who had their money tied<br />

up in agriculture. He caused inflation by abandoning the gold standard in 1898 because of an<br />

economic slump. The Protocols say that such economic depressions are caused by the Elders to<br />

gain control of the money; and that the gold standard has ruined every country that has adopted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!