contents - Description: Description: Description: Description ...

The Ditchley Group, which first met in May, 1982, at Ditchley Park in London, is
engineering a plan by Harold Lever (a director on the Board of the UNILEVER conglomerate) to
control the fiscal and the monetary policies of the United States and called for the International
Monetary Fund to control the central banks of all nations. Representatives of 36 of the world’s
biggest banks met at the Vista Hotel in New York in January, 1982, to lay the groundwork; then
met again in October, where it was reported that plans were underway to bring legislation before
the U.S. Senate that would designate the IMF as the Controller of U.S. fiscal policy by the year
2000.
On January 8, 1983, Hans Vogel of the Club of Rome, met at the White House with President
Reagan, Secretary of State George Schultz, Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, George
Kennan, and Lane Kirkland (President of the AFL-CIO), to discuss the objectives of the Ditchley
Group. The Group met on January 10-11, 1983 in Washington to discuss the IMF takeover; and
later in the year, in Williamsburg, Virginia, with a group of international bankers, to discuss a
disintegration of the U.S. banking system which would force the Senate into accepting IMF
control. Dennis Weatherstone of Morgan Guaranty said that this was the only way for the U.S. to
save itself.
The propaganda of world peace propels the United Nations further into the control of this
world, and what negative publicity has emerged, has done little to slow its momentum.
Originally the UN wanted the United States to pay 50% of their budget, but eventually,
negotiations lowered the amount to 39.89%. Later it was lowered further to 25%, or about $3.9
billion. At one point, the Soviet Union was only paying 13%; Japan, 10%; West Germany, 8%;
Great Britain, 4%; and Saudi Arabia, .5%. The 100+ Third World-non-aligned countries were
only paying 9%, yet controlled 3/4 of the voting power in the General Assembly; and the 80
poorest countries were contributing less than 1% of the UN budget. In September, 1983, the
Senate introduced legislation that sought to cut the U.S.’s contribution by 21% for 1983-84, and
10% more for each of the following three years, which would make America’s portion of the UN
budget less than 15%.
The United States further showed their displeasure with the United Nations, when in
December, 1983, the Reagan Administration announced it was withdrawing from UNESCO,
because the UN agency had “increasingly placed an overfed bureaucracy at the service of a
coalition of Soviet bloc and Third World countries,” which was to be effective January 1, 1985,
unless reforms were made. UNESCO was labeled by newsman Paul Harvey as “communism’s
trap for our youth.” Another area which demonstrated the UN’s communist leanings was
revealed by the McGraw Edison Committee for Public Affairs: “The United Nations’
International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) ... appropriated $59,000,000 between 1947
and 1958 to Communist countries. In a ratio not unlike that of other UN ventures, the United
States has furnished $42,000,000 of the money ... As with other aid programs, the assistance
does not go to the needy but it is administered through governments.”
Since the establishment of the UN, up to 1991, there were 157 wars. J. Reuben Clark, Jr.,
Ambassador to Mexico, and Under Secretary of State, in his August, 1945, analysis of the UN
Charter, wrote: “The Charter is built to prepare for war, not to promote peace ... The Charter is a
war document, not a peace document...” He is quoted (pg. 27) in the book The United Nations
Today as saying: “Not only does the Charter Organization (UN) not prevent future wars, but it
makes it practically certain that we shall have future wars; and as to such wars, it takes from us
(U.S.) the power to declare them, to choose the side on which we shall fight, and to determine
what forces and military equipment we shall use in the war, and to control and command our